That's precisely what's being criticized.Ever heard of a simple cable on sale at any apple store which has USB C port on one side and lightning on another?
they even come in different lenghts![]()
That's precisely what's being criticized.Ever heard of a simple cable on sale at any apple store which has USB C port on one side and lightning on another?
they even come in different lenghts![]()
Ever heard of a simple cable on sale at any apple store which has USB C port on one side and lightning on another?
they even come in different lenghts![]()
With Bluetooth headsets created less cables more batteries. It’s a trade-off, imo.Regardless of what one thinks of this law, I find the Apple statement hilarious.
• Ever heard of the headphone jack removal? Also, you don't want external adaptors… what about those USB-C only Macs?
Floppies died, vhs died, 8 track died, laser discs died. All connectors will undergo an end of life.• Could you tell us more about that 30 pin connector removal please?
Correct, see above.• Lightning dates back to 2012, right? It's not like you're in a hurry to create a new port every year.
Suppositions are fun.The Lightning cables will go in the garbage before USB-C cables anyway.
Oh Europe how cute you are to think one person has all the say! I don't know how many power, RCA-3.5mm, printer USB cables, Micro-USB, USB-2, Ethernet, HDMI, Optical cables I have lying around.
Show me the Lightning roadmap.Suppositions are fun.
Ask Apple if you are that interested.Show me the Lightning roadmap.
USB4 goes far further than anything Lightning has.Ask Apple if you are that interested.
Show me the usb roadmap for the next 10 years.
That’s not a roadmap. Hundreds of millions of devices have lightning. It has more life than usb4 will ever have.USB4 goes far further than anything Lightning has.
I don't need to ask Apple. They told everybody Lightning is dead by putting USB-C on the iPad Pro.
You are joking.It has more life than usb4 will ever have.
Nope I’m serious. You seriously believe the EU can force Apple to a certain hardware design? Apple will provide dongles.You are joking.
If the EU wants to force Apple, they can do it.
The only reason to allow Apple to introduce Lightning devices this year is if they plan to go fully wireless in 2021.
Of course they can force it. Unless Apple wants to stop selling devices in the EU or make different versions.Nope I’m serious. You seriously believe the EU can force Apple to a certain hardware design? Apple isn’t going fully wireless either. A decent method to charge the phone is needed.
They told everybody Lightning is dead by putting USB-C on the iPad Pro.
Not using the same connector for all iOS goes against Apple's own rules.How so?
iPad Pro follows Apple's normal paradigm of USBC on "host" devices intended to be used with external peripherals, and Lightning on "satellite" devices like phones or ipods or airpods.
The change was more that the ipad pro is more of a "host" device now rather than a "satellite" as prior ipads have been.
Not using the same connector for all iOS goes against Apple's own rules.
Your belief they can force it might be very different than reality.Of course they can force it. Unless Apple wants to stop selling devices in the EU or make different versions.
Apple strives for minimalism, not practicality. It would not be surprising if they plan to get rid of all ports.
The EU already forced Microsoft to offer a version of Windows without WMP and later a browser choice window.Your belief they can force it might be very different than reality.
Again, getting rid of all ports means one has to provide a robust way to charge in every situation.
One is flipping a few bits, the other is disenfranchising potentially 10s of millions of people.The EU already forced Microsoft to offer a version of Windows without WMP and later a browser choice window.
It is Apple who likes terrible design, not me.
Apple has not been great for years.One is flipping a few bits, the other is disenfranchising potentially 10s of millions of people.
Apple has great design and great hardware. Lightning should be standardized.
Yes, USB-C is a marketing nightmare. There's a reason there's a lot of confusion regarding it: It is very confusing. Many technicians I know are confused by it, so it's no wonder consumers are.But each protocol change requires new cables. 20 gig, 40 gig, how much power 50w or 100w, usb 3 or tb 3, etc its really a confusing tangle. And aren’t some incompatible even if they fit? Like if its a TB3 cable, but the chipset on the computer is only usb 3? Is it 3? 3.1? 3.2? 3.2x2?
Just buy a cable that supports everything.Yes, USB-C is a marketing nightmare. There's a reason there's a lot of confusion regarding it: It is very confusing. Many technicians I know are confused by it, so it's no wonder consumers are.
Putting in new tech that benefits a few, disenfranchises millions and helps little and causes massive waste is a universal failure waiting to happen.Apple has not been great for years.
Lightning is the past, USB4 is the future.
Getting rid of old wasteful technology disenfranchises nobody.
The Lightning stuff will have to be thrown away anyway. The USB-C stuff will last for the foreseeable future.Putting in new tech that benefits a few helps no one and causes massive waste.
Usb-c as a connector is inferior to the lightning cable and will have to be thrown away for that reason. I think what this will boil down to is dongles and adapters.The Lightning stuff will have to be thrown away anyway. The USB-C stuff will last for the foreseeable future.