That said (post #69 above, where I like the M3), am I the only one that is perplexed by the memory configuration with the M3 Pro? Only a 4GB increase in maximum memory capacity?
Then, there is the odd memory specs for the M3 Pro where they have reduced the memory speeds from 200GB/s to just 150GB/s.
I wonder, is it possible that they have a glitch in the current M3 Pro that is forcing these odd choices? I guess the change in memory speed could be a cost-cutting effort, but why just 4GB of additional memory?
I was kind of hoping that we'd have 64GB on the M3 Pro so that I could get a new, M3 Pro Mac mini next year as my main desktop system. But, with only 36GB (apparently) I think I'll have to change my plans. But, that might not be a bad idea since a high-end Mac mini is about the same price as an entry-level Mac Studio and the Studio is a much more capable system.