I think this is just a neat device to take when your travelling... No real use when doing serious work.
What is serious work?No real use when doing serious work.
You know I keep reading this as if the iPod Touch's screen is perfect for any and every purpose. It just seems like such an empty, red herring statement.
That's fair. The blown-up iPhone home screen looks a little absurd, with the icons way too far apart. But it's not a terribly big deal, unless you plan to spend lots of time admiring your vast collection of apps. The rest of the stuff they've done with the UI looks pretty good., an O/S setup that doesn't look like it's a spaced out/stretched out iPhone O/S
You realize the room was full of journalists, right? They're not paid to gaze in awe upon whatever device is being announced. The ones who weren't live blogging were at least taking notes.The device just seems lazy... I mean, people were not paying attention to Jobs' unveiling of the device -- they were texting away!
LOL - right here
Google is significant, and that comes under the category of other commercial reasons for not liking Flash. They are significant and influential because they actually do have major market share. That has nothing whatsoever to do with Apple. Given the actual browser share of Mobile Safari, what Apple say makes no difference either way, except to fanboys obviously, who proclaim it from the hills as some sort of Internet salvation while missing the bleeding obvious - Mobile Safari is (for at least a while yet) insignificant, and MAC OS X does have Flash - some "message" then.
That's true, but not relevant since it's a high percentage of something that itself is minute. There are more than 1.7 billion web users - and how many iPod/iPod touches?
I think this is just a neat device to take when your travelling... No real use when doing serious work.
You realize the room was full of journalists, right? They're not paid to gaze in awe upon whatever device is being announced. The ones who weren't live blogging were at least taking notes.
Put me in the camp who can't wait to get their hands on an iPad! I'm still undecided between the 3G version and the basic wi-fi only, but that's my only indecision regarding this purchase!
I think the rumors of a desktop touch computer from Apple are probably true.... why can't the iPhone OS be used in a desktop appliance, as well?
I advise to wait a few week after Apple starts selling it. If there is a major problem(s) with the device...
You abandoned us, Joe.
Nobody cares what you think now.
"iWork" - the clue is in the name.
That is what most work computers are used for anyway, spreadsheets and word processing
I think this is just a neat device to take when your travelling... No real use when doing serious work.
mac mini running at 1024x768 somewhere in the house with a wifi vnc connection and you have a portable touchscreen imac.
I advise to wait for a few years for Apple to pull finger out first...
Potential is huge though - I hope they'll get to it eventually some time this decade![]()
Well, was a lil underwhelmed when iPad (still giggling at the name choice) was first announced. But now that we know what we are actually gonna get and there`s no point in dreaming about an iTablet as powerful as the MacBook, I`m now leaning towards getting this thing. In the last couple of days, I`ve found myself in more than a few situations where iPad would have been so much useful compared to either my Macbook or the iPod touch. I know I`ll be getting it for sure now. Just wish I could get atleast 32GB for the base model.
However, the tablets running Windows 7 will be even more inexpensive and open to an even more massive audience of developers. Plus, they will not be crippled with a phone OS focused on "media consumption." Apple blew it by not putting OS X on the iPad.
But that's for PCs! Apple said it in the ads! Oh my God, what is happening?!!
Haha yah. A brand new 2010 macbook with a 1024-by-768 display. Riiiiigghhhttt![]()
Awesome - the iPad is so advanced it could even contact the deadiPad Ouija Board!