Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Why is this movie 2.5 hrs long. That's too long watching cars go fast, interspersed with boring drama I won't care about
Because lots of us like watching cars go fast. It didn’t feel too long for me. But, I’m straight from watching 20 out of 24 hours of Le Mans, so…

I was pleasantly surprised that they kept the story pretty simple and spent most of the time on breathtakingly good visuals with audio to match. It’s no Godfather II, but if you enjoy a good ‘ole car chase, this is the movie for you. Basically, don’t overanalyse and enjoy the action, and you will have a good 2.5 hours. If you don’t like watching cars go fast, don’t bother.
 
Which is exactly the reason I will wait for the F1 to come to streaming. And for me to be slightly drunk.

I loved the original Top Gun and heard good things about the Maverick. After watching it I was like “that was some silly ass movie and not in the good way as the first”.

But I am glad that Apple seems to have a hit on their hands, I do like ATV+ and this is good for the service so it’s good for me.
FWIW, I agree with the description of “Maverick but F1”, but I liked F1 more. Maverick was entertaining for a couple of hours, but I probably won’t re-watch it. I could definitely see myself watching F1 again. Maybe driving cars is just more relatable than flying fighter jets.
 
Not seen it yet not even the trailer.

But the description of it that it’s ‘Barbie for dads’ makes me want to see it.
 
Apple better get their act together. This is the stupid U2 thing all over again. I'm never going to watch any of the Apple TV crap but getting it advertised to me over and over, even in apps, is just disgusting.
 
Saw it IN A THEATRE yesterday. I thought it was well done, and beyond opinions of some of the content, everything was pretty phenomenal. Getting a racing movie to work on a screen is difficult at best, but this one seems to have accomplished the job nicely.
 
I get that movies need box office numbers to earn any real attention, but I can’t stand going to the movie house. It’s exhausting, sticky, overpriced, and there’s always someone glued to their phone next to me. The sound’s just okay, but there are lines, too. I like small-town theaters, sure—but I can’t pause to pee, there are no subtitles, and I usually end up wedged next to someone with a cold who generously shares it.
As for Apple’s exhausting ad campaign? Just a preview of how invasive they’ll get with anything else if the check clears. I hope they don’t—because if they do, I’m going full analog: flip phone, typewriter, and news from the paperboy.
 
Give anyone the chance to complain about a big company and they will.

If this becomes a real problem in the future, I’ll flip the switch to kill all Wallet ads and be done with it. I don’t need anyone throwing the whataboutisms at me, let’s see how Apple responds to the criticism and then act accordingly like adults.

Apple assuredly can see how many people have disabled notifications thru anonymous aggregated metrics and will adapt their future marketing strategies accordingly.
But that's the point - you can't disable notifications from wallet without disabling the notifications for all transactions in your wallet from cards that you use. By misusing a channel designed for just financial transaction notifications the user is left with a choice between not being notified about something important (your card was just used to spend x) and receiving an ad from Apple. That's why Apple prohibit companies from doing precisely what they just did
 
By misusing a channel designed for just financial transaction notifications the user is left with a choice between not being notified about something important (your card was just used to spend x) and receiving an ad from Apple.

That's why Apple prohibit companies from doing precisely what they just did

It's really as crystal clear as this.

Apple just broke its own rules for others.

100% unacceptable.
 
I don’t see the big deal. I also don’t recall seeing the ads either though.
It's because it's not just an entry down on their occasional list of special offers under the Apple Card, they put it at the top of the Wallet app's main screen, above all the cards, and they sent a push notification for it. Previously all the push notifications from Wallet have been "you spent $X at place Y on card Z", or, early on, "card Z is now ready for use", and once a month something like "your Apple Card balance of $X will be paid tomorrow". All business - and every one of those notifications was worth looking at, was something you should look at.

Now they've thrown an ad into the mix. Saying, "okay, actually, not every push notification from Wallet is worth looking at, because now they may include ads". It's not that was a push notification, and a dismissible banner ad, it was that they intruded into a space that was previously "business only". You're used to getting in your car and turning it on and using the controls and readouts to drive somewhere - it's a utility to you, "all business" - you bought it or leased it (or stole it or whatever), and you expect it to provide you the intended service and nothing else. Now what if you got in your car, and started it, and the car itself started playing a McDonalds ad on the dashboard before you could drive anywhere - you'd be pretty unhappy, because that wasn't part of the original deal.

If the F1 ad is a one-time thing, it's not that bad (Apple is excited to let everyone know about their foray into a new market, the cinema). If it becomes a regular thing, then yes, it is a "big deal".

When they did the "free U2 album on everyone's device" thing, they genuinely thought they were doing something that everybody would enjoy. They found out the hard way that many people disliked U2, or didn't want the space used up, or didn't want the bandwidth used to download the album, or didn't want to have to figure out how to delete it. I think that surprised them. They got the message, and didn't do anything like that again.

The equivalent for this would have been if they gave everyone a free ticket to the movie - I suspect some would object to even that. But this wasn't a free thing, it was taking advantage of a service people have come to trust (Apple Wallet), to try to sell something to them. Again, if it's a one-time thing, call it a fluke and get over it. But if it happens again, I'm going to be pretty annoyed (and I suspect a whole bunch of other people will be as well).
 
The wallet app joined the long list of apps that will never be able to show me notifications again, nothing like being in the middle of patient care and your watch dings and it's an ad for their new F1 movie. Go F yourself Apple, this and the low rent trash ads in the App store ensure I interact with these things much less than I otherwise would.
 
  • Love
Reactions: turbineseaplane
Brad probably can’t even drive his own car - hard pass. You wanna see a good movie about F1, watch Senna.

Let’s all contribute to sending ATV+ where it belongs: the dustbin of failed Tim Spindler ventures.
He did drive a test lap which you can see on Vision Pro. Just saying…
 
  • Like
Reactions: CarlJ
Brad probably can’t even drive his own car - hard pass. You wanna see a good movie about F1, watch Senna.

Let’s all contribute to sending ATV+ where it belongs: the dustbin of failed Tim Spindler ventures.

No idea if it’s a good movie or not, but…
Pitt got behind the wheel of the 2023 McLaren MCL60 on Thursday at the Circuit of The Americas in Austin – home of the United States Grand Prix – with the Hollywood superstar revealing he hit a top speed of 197mph, delivering on Lando Norris’ advice not to “c*ck it up.”

“It was Lando’s ’23 [car],” Pitt revealed. “I did not sleep for 36 hours afterwards. I was on such a high.”

 
  • Like
Reactions: CarlJ
I don't know, Apple sending a discount code sounds way less annoying than selling SD movies as HD, which is what they did to me. The iOS upgrade last fall appears to have switched the Video Definition setting for my iPhone's TV app to SD, so I was buying new movies on my phone for 3 months before I went to watch them on my physical TV at Christmas and realized that they didn't look FHD, let alone 4K. It appears not one of the TV app programmers bothered to switch the interface to indicate that you are buying/watching SD if the switch is thrown in settings. The TV app still indicates they are HD, but the summary screen on the Mac application doesn't show the HD or 4K indicator, so that means I bought several low resolution movies in those three months and have enough buyer's remorse to not buy from them again, since they declined the refund that the support person applied for after telling me that was the solution. I can't believe Apple is even still selling SD movies in 2025!

Anyone else been burned by the TV app not showing that the Video Definition has been switched so you aren't buying the HD movie it says you are buying?
 
Last edited:
People are always crying for discounts, coupons, freebies, etc.
Now Apple offers a $10 OFF discount for a Movie Ticket, and people crying and complain. If Apple didn’t, they would have complained about how greedy is Apple that don’t give their users a discount.

So they used the notification channel of the Apple Wallet app. They could have used the TV+ App, which not everyone has access to. Or the Apple Music app, but people would have complained that this is a Music App; also, not everybody uses it.
So the way to reach the most users is the Wallet app.

Please stop being crybabies; if you don’t want the discount just ignore it and trash it.
Yep. You figured out the puzzle. You’re on to something.. keep that line of thinking open and you’ll see it in ..well… all the places. (Not sarcasm, Not snarky, not kidding)
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Amazing Iceman
It's in Apple Music now
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3961.jpeg
    IMG_3961.jpeg
    1.2 MB · Views: 16
Brad probably can’t even drive his own car - hard pass. You wanna see a good movie about F1, watch Senna.

Let’s all contribute to sending ATV+ where it belongs: the dustbin of failed Tim Spindler ventures.

He does and he did. The cinematography in this was pretty great. Pitt absolutely was driving an F1 car (it's all over the YouTubes.)

Why is this movie 2.5 hrs long. That's too long watching cars go fast, interspersed with boring drama I won't care about
I didn't see the movie. I won't see the movie. But here's my opinion. Great post. Thanks. Very useful.

Wait people watch F1 racing here in the US? :p

I just assumed the title referenced some minor tornado rolling through some small midwestern town.
Yes. There's around 20 of us. :p

And just like the majority of the people who watch the real life F1 races, everyone going to watch the movie in the theater cares only about the crashes. :)
It's got that!

I wish I woulda seen that ad in my wallet. Would have made our two tickets at 9:30am half price.

Beyond everyone clutching their pearls about an ad, it was a pretty good movie. I'm a big F1 fan and they did a good job of representing the sport. Cinematography and sound (Atmos, baby!) were really good. Would not be surprised if sound design got on Oscar nomination.

It had a healthy dose of Hollywood BS but it felt like they didn't give too much exposition to explain F1 to newbies, and there was enough in there for a fan to appreciate. It was pretty cool how they took race footage that we fans all know and love and integrated it into the film. Visual effects were unobtrusive and seamless.

For F1 fans it's almost worth it just to see the Gunther Steiner cameo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CarlJ
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.