Exactly. They'll catch up once they use it.Raise phone to wake.
It’s already unlocked because I will be looking at it.
Swipe up to go to home screen.
Not really any slower than pushing down on a home button (since you will be raising the phone to your face to use it anyways).
That said, am I the only one whose realizes that you'll be swiping right on whatever notification has come up as Face ID is recognising you. Once it does, you'll be put right into whatever app had the notification.
This is 2-3 times faster than Touch ID. With which you have to swipe the notification, THEN place finger on button; or vice versa, to be placed into the app. Face Id eliminates an entire step or more if you just go to home screen THEN into the app that had the notification.
Damn, now my 8+ sounds old.
I think people misinterpret FaceID. The idea isn't to spend time analyzing how or why it works or whether it's slower than TouchID or not. The idea is that it blurs the perception of needing authentication at all to unlock your phone. You shouldn’t have to consciously align your eyes into two circles for it to work.
I think what Apple was going for was using FaceID to take care of all the security stuff behind the scenes so you don't have too. It removes having to think about authenticating to access something because faceID has already detected that it is you.
What you're left with is a phone that is as easy to access as one without a passcode. No longer do you have to go through security checks because it is all done automatically. It seems pretty seamless when it works, and we're still only in V1, compared to Touch ID which has had 4 years of improvement.
Further illustrates the difference in design philosophy between Apple and the rest of the competition. This is precisely what I am paying for when I buy an Apple product - the extra thought that goes into designing it.
Is there a way to look at the iPhone X without unlocking it, like there is with a TouchID-enabled device?
They both use invisible near-infrared but nice try.
There is no 2 step process. Swipe up and unlock happen simultaneously according to a John Gruber.Is it still possible to bypass the 2-stage unlock and go directly to the home screen / active app?
I.e. is there a face ID equivent of the "rest finger to open" setting for Touch ID?
Stop posting.Well, of course, it's slow. Apple needs to release something better next year and charge even more money for it.
I get that FaceID is designed to unlock your phone when you look at it. That's the issue. You look at your phone and it unlocks, whether you want it to or not, it unlocks. With TouchID, you can look at your phone as much as you want, and it remains locked until you want it unlocked, by intentionally using your finger to unlock it.
Take your phone out of your pocket to check the time, it unlocks. Place it on your desk and look at it, it unlocks.
The excitement, for me, is seeing the beginning of a more intimate, fluid, almost symbiotic, relationship with this device (and with others in the future. I’m thrilled to see the technology being pushed forward in this direction.Raise phone to wake.
It’s already unlocked because I will be looking at it.
Swipe up to go to home screen.
Not really any slower than pushing down on a home button (since you will be raising the phone to your face to use it anyways).
That said, am I the only one whose realizes that you'll be swiping right on whatever notification has come up as Face ID is recognising you. Once it does, you'll be put right into whatever app had the notification.
This is 2-3 times faster than Touch ID. With which you have to swipe the notification, THEN place finger on button; or vice versa, to be placed into the app. Face Id eliminates an entire step or more if you just go to home screen THEN into the app that had the notification.
Damn, now my 8+ sounds old.
I think people misinterpret FaceID. The idea isn't to spend time analyzing how or why it works or whether it's slower than TouchID or not. The idea is that it blurs the perception of needing authentication at all to unlock your phone. You shouldn’t have to consciously align your eyes into two circles for it to work.
I think what Apple was going for was using FaceID to take care of all the security stuff behind the scenes so you don't have too. It removes having to think about authenticating to access something because faceID has already detected that it is you.
What you're left with is a phone that is as easy to access as one without a passcode. No longer do you have to go through security checks because it is all done automatically. It seems pretty seamless when it works, and we're still only in V1, compared to Touch ID which has had 4 years of improvement.
Further illustrates the difference in design philosophy between Apple and the rest of the competition. This is precisely what I am paying for when I buy an Apple product - the extra thought that goes into designing it.
When I was younger, I derived a lot more joy from having the latest and greatest no matter what bugs, kinks, and incompatibilities stood in my way.
3 steps to unlock?
press side button, look at it, then swipe up.
vs
1 step to unlock: put thumb on home button and push.
This is not an improvement!
I hope I can sell mine on ebay if this is as stupid as it sounds.
Also curious about this..If Apple sells more of the iPhone 8 than the iPhone X what will Apple do.........
This is a good question! During my commute, I look at my phone quite often just to see what the time is, or who just tried to contact me. For security reasons it would be better to not have the phone unlock during those brief interactions - it'd be nice if that was possible without completely disabling FaceID.
I'm going to go out on a limb here and predict that - once the wider population figures out how this works, there will be thieves taking advantage of that moment to grab and dash.
If Apple sells more of the iPhone 8 than the iPhone X what will Apple do.........
Waiting for second gen Face ID to be so fast that people complain forcing Apple to change how the you unlock the device
(For those don’t remember, that happened with Touch ID)
Agreed. I've been slightly burned in the past for buying into new hardware before it is fully baked. Not going to happen again. I'm getting too old for that.
I am worried about getting used to a couple of things. One of them is using hands-free in the car. Before I could just rest a finger on it and it would unlock and I could continue. With Face ID in order to use hands-free features ill have to point the phone at my face. Somewhat defeats the purpose of hands-free.
I suspect that the phone is powerful enough that they could increase the speed almost arbitrarily. We should see it faster in a point upgrade if people want it bad enough. Or the device will just get faster over time as it learns your face better.
Face ID: pick up your phone and have it 10-20 inches in front your face and be looking at the phone and swipe upTouch ID: pick up your phone and put thumb on reader.
Face ID: pick up your phone and swipe up.
Simple.
Putting on a clown nose apparently works. Or Groucho Marx glasses.