Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I placed this note in the eBay feedback page:

Just to let you know that I am seriously considering canceling my account with you since you filed a briefing with the court against Apple. Your actions are very wrong headed in the business environment. Your corporation is base out of the US and you're siding with a foreign company that is doing serious harm to a company based in the US. I wonder if I should report you to the NSA, FBI, CIA, and others. Do you have products for sale that harm US citizens from terrorist organizations? I may send an inquiry to the California State Attorney General for your actions.
I actually cringed at this. I'm sure eBay are running real scared right now.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: H2SO4
And I think it's absolutely hilarious how people are on here writing angry letters to EBay and Google and canceling Facebook accounts, all for the love of Apple. If Apple was ever reincarnated into a person, he/she would be the second coming of Charles Manson. The power and mind control that Apple holds over its hardcore fans is absolutely frightening.
 
So Apple's competition and those whose producta they killed off are saying don't side with Apple .... Well that is a shocker.

Any sane official would see this and say jog on but in the US legal system .... Apple are probably screwed.
 
Of course this whole debacle stifles innovation. Competition is good, but Apple don't seem to think so.

From what I understand, it would only be a problem for Apple if another company went beyond profiteering from that product. It's all very well pasting images of Samsung/Asus/HP computers that look like Macs, but do any of them make a dent in a computer industry that is already declining?

You could take any household product design and apply the same thought process. Heck, what about televisions? Every electronics company on the planet has sold a fat black box with the same buttons and remote.
 
Last edited:
And I think it's absolutely hilarious how people are on here writing angry letters to EBay and Google and canceling Facebook accounts, all for the love of Apple. If Apple was ever reincarnated into a person, he/she would be the second coming of Charles Manson. The power and mind control that Apple holds over its hardcore fans is absolutely frightening.


Apple is just a good company that's all. The others just suck big time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Benjamin Frost
Reasons
Samsung:
yIuzZ04.jpg


Google:
zjVCqTF.png


HP:
kEw56jw.jpg


Dell:
jFMFjLa.jpg


Facebook:
BhB096n.jpg


While your post may have merrit elsewhere, please read the blog post.

"They argue that any company could then be opened up to patent infringement cases for insignificant features like a specific user interface creation that only appears on a single screen of an app, therefore stifling innovation."
 
Basically the 'friends of the court' want the court to understand that Apple is rolling in cash and that it's unfair to not let the small fish nibble on the whale.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Benjamin Frost
I placed this note in the eBay feedback page:

Just to let you know that I am seriously considering canceling my account with you since you filed a briefing with the court against Apple. Your actions are very wrong headed in the business environment. Your corporation is base out of the US and you're siding with a foreign company that is doing serious harm to a company based in the US. I wonder if I should report you to the NSA, FBI, CIA, and others. Do you have products for sale that harm US citizens from terrorist organizations? I may send an inquiry to the California State Attorney General for your actions.

My word for a country that is supposed to be the home of free enterprise you sure do sound like a protectionist. :eek:
 
Of course this whole debacle stifles innovation. Competition is good, but Apple don't seem to think so.

You could take any household product design and apply the same thought process. Heck, what about televisions? Every electronics company on the planet has sold a fat black box with the same buttons and remote.
Well according to most of the posters here that should be illegal.
All companies that released a product after the original TV should have put the screen somewhere different. The Apple stance would have forced their competitors to put screens on the back bottom and sides. After that, we’d see the screen on the inside and finally a screen not even on the box itself.
 
Newegg: A company that sells overpriced PC parts that caters to basement-dwelling windows fanboys.

I don't use them because I've gotten a lot of defective product from them in the past, but they usually are the cheapest.

I'd gladly buy a nice gaming rig where I can upgrade the parts as needed from Apple. Please let me know which one I should get if you don't mind. ...and no, my maxed out Mac Pro isn't sufficient because the two video cards in it do not have drivers that are optimized for gaming. That's why they state that they are "work class" graphics processors. Also, having two new Titan Ti's is faster than the two Amd's on the pro. (The Ti's are new, and the Firex are old) I do prefer OSX for workflow though.

Also, I have two mac minis in the basement with 20' hdmi's connected to receivers in my house, so the only basement dwellers are a couple of Mac computers. Just FYI.
 
We have some low cost supermarket discounters in the UK where one literally has to do a double take on the packaging due to the blatant rip-off of the established big brand names.

No one cares and none of the companies involved are beating a path to the courts either. The fact is many of these products are great value. Some of the posters on this thread really need to grow up both mentally and I suspect physically.

No mature sane person could be chewed bothering over things like this.
 
We have some low cost supermarket discounters in the UK where one literally has to do a double take on the packaging due to the blatant rip-off of the established big brand names.

No one cares and none of the companies involved are beating a path to the courts either. The fact is many of these products are great value. Some of the posters on this thread really need to grow up both mentally and I suspect physically.

No mature sane person could be chewed bothering over things like this.
Big brands also rip off small companies and there is nothing the little fish can do. Remember that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SirCheese
I placed this note in the eBay feedback page:

Just to let you know that I am seriously considering canceling my account with you since you filed a briefing with the court against Apple. Your actions are very wrong headed in the business environment. Your corporation is base out of the US and you're siding with a foreign company that is doing serious harm to a company based in the US. I wonder if I should report you to the NSA, FBI, CIA, and others. Do you have products for sale that harm US citizens from terrorist organizations? I may send an inquiry to the California State Attorney General for your actions.

Wow, talk about far flung.

Personally I hate patents. Yes, it's money driven, but they only hold society at a standstill. The problem is that they've become so broad in scope they are creating patent trolls and truly stifling innovation. At this point in time the only people who are for patents already own thousands of them, or do not understand the system.

If you are truly upset, you should complain to every large corporation. Even then it won't do you any good. There's this thing called lobbying. Paying elected officials to vote in favor of your company basically. Which is legal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Woyzeck
i wish these type lawsuits would go away. if someone has a good idea, it should not be against the law to create something similar. if something is deemed too similar, it should be handled with licensing fees. samsung makes hardware for apple, why sue a company that you do good business with? patent law needs to be reformed!
 
"

God forbid that happens. Let's let Apple's use their cash to cover R&D for the entire Silicon Valley. While we're at it, why not force them to give out tech patent freebies every Christmas. They're rich bastards anyway, amirite? /s

OR (just a wild thought) how about we let the companies do their own R&D and stop holding their hand. Samsung's scummy infringement practices have bankrupted, or virtually bankrupted, multiple competitors in the course of their slimy history and the only reason Google is defending them is because they're dependent on their largest OEM.

You're missing the point.

They argue that any company could then be opened up to patent infringement cases for insignificant features like a specific user interface creation that only appears on a single screen of an app, therefore stifling innovation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kdarling
scottsjack;

From my former employer, I took a few basic courses in copyright and trademark laws and regulations. According to the courses I've taken, Samedung and others ARE in violation of the laws. fb, google, ebay, hp, dell, and others are ignorant of the law. If one defends these (can't say the word here - I have my standards), than they are just as guilty.

Just because it's a law, doesn't mean it's right. There are some laws where if you get caught spitting (not on someone, just in general) you will get a caning. (15 lashes with a very hurtful stick).
 
You're missing the point.

They argue that any company could then be opened up to patent infringement cases for insignificant features like a specific user interface creation that only appears on a single screen of an app, therefore stifling innovation.

If there are no patents in user interface. All of them will look like an iPhone.

We're currently in a world with patents, how much more they'll blatantly copy it if there aren't?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.