Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Why do we need to go anywhere? There was life before Facebook and there is life after? I know, I deleted FB and never looked back.
In developed markets, yes, moving away from Facebook should not be that hard since most people already use the internet prior to Facebook. You will only see the first-world-problem complaining here and there.

In the emerging markets, however, things can be a bit tricky societally. In these markets, most people had not experienced the internet nor computing until their first smartphone, and Facebook has been hooking people from day 1 with their free internet programs and carrier deals (so using Facebook won’t use up your quota), to the point that many people think Facebook as the “internet.” This is also why imo hoaxes and extremists can propagate easily in many countries through Facebook. The society just ain’t that mature yet in their awareness and critical thinking about the internet.

The alternative would be the messaging apps like WhatsApp, and Facebook knows this, thus their purchase of WhatsApp.
 
The way their platform has been instrumental in spreading fake information and the deals they make to sell user information is striking

I never joined FB. I remember years ago visiting FB pages for businesses and public entities such as entertainers, musicians and so on. I wasn’t a member of FB, didn’t really have an interest in being a member, and was just looking at the FB page from folks who would obviously want anyone to see their content.

So the first thing I noticed when I landed on the page was a partial window at the bottom encouraging me to sign up. That partial window would steadily grow in size as scrolled further down the page until it basically blocked everything and the message changed to “sign in or join to see more”. I figured that if FB was that great, well let’s have a look and if it’s that good I’d want to join. No need to ask. But FB wasn’t looking particularly great at the time to me, in fact it was looking pretty belligerent. And those relentless obnoxious sign in or join notices could only mean one thing: they want something from me and they’re not saying what. Bottom line is FB ain’t free folks, you pay with your data and your data is valuable. Just ask Zuckerberg.

I notice a lot of business/retail websites are getting worse and worse over the years. Lately I’ve noticed email sign up pop ups that occur less than a minute after visiting the main page that I need to get rid of before I can go on. It’s like walking into a room filled with people you want to say hello to, but before you even have a chance to say hi or do anything, the first thing that happens is someone in the room let’s loose with a huge noisy smelly fart. And they don’t even say excuse me. That’s retail on the web these days.
 
The fact that people think they can 'delete their Facebook' shows you how little they understand about what's actually going on here.
 
So glad I deleted my (useless) Facebook account.

I did, a while back. Then I lost some level of contact with far away family....

I sadly came back.

But, since I use 1password (all my passwords are unique and long/complicated) and 2FA, I'm not worried about "that"... but there are still lots to worry about
 
While many are saying "is anyone surprised" I actually am at this.

This is one of the largest corporations in the world, whose sole business is its internet applications, and they ignored one of the most basic security expectations of hashing a password?

That is absolutely surprising and shameful and there is no excuse from them that is acceptable.

Not suprising to me. Facebook have proven that they are careless about their “customers” during all these years. There should be fines for billions of dollars raining over them but until that happens, better change your passwords regularly and dont upload too many personal information on their platform.
 
Is the news here that FB employees actually do have access to FB user accounts? Really?

I mean if this sort of access is not provided by passwords stored as plain text, then surely they also have the same level of access via their "admin" or "super-user" tools, built into the backend and they can easily see the full contents of any account they wish, without actually having to "log in" to said account?

So is the real concern that they can more readily share said access with a 3rd party? Because if somebody's willing enough to do that, he might as well have be willing enough to do that with the "super-user" tool and leaked the info out that way...

Anyway, and in conclusion, don't ever store ANYTHING truly personal with a company. More news at 11.
The problem is that this same password will be the same as the email passoword for probably 80% of the people on the internet. Give me 5000 email passwords of real persons and I wont need to work during the rest of my life. You can do all sorts of bad things with this info. Your imagination is the limit.
 
Yes. At this point, storing non-hashed passwords should be a criminal offense. Period. The CEO and Chief Engineer of any firm doing it should get jail time for it. That will stop it. This isn't rocket science either, the protocols to make this kind of thing impossible are pretty well known.

Having worked in companies like this... it's called "tech debt"... it's the thing that doesn't visibly add value to the product and keeps getting "de-prioritized", but it's the thing that the software developers know should be taken care of. This is careless, thoughtless management at its finest.
 
Good thing I don't put anything on FB that I consider private. Still the principle of it matters. But with that said. One should know that once you put something on the internet it's not guaranteed to be kept absolutely private.
 
Not storing passwords in plaintext is something they teach you in your first year of Computer Science in college. The developers at Facebook are just hackers, plain and simple, NOT software engineers.

Glad I deleted my FB account years ago. No regrets.
 
Delete Facebook and delete your accounts
And while you are at it delete Twitter and joins gab.ai and use dissenter plugin. Watch project veritas videos on yt with Twitter employees bragging about having access to cleartext passwords.
 
You know that the world is a mess when the thousands of people wise enough to not have social media accounts are more concerned/worried/upset with these revelations than the billions that do have.
I have zero social media accounts, but actually am using Whatsapp (contextual honesty).

I am not concerned, neither worried or upset with those revelations whatsoever. I find this kind of news silly, and irrelevant compared to the bigger picture of the immature modern society.

But hey, I am a person that visions the world as a Kafkaesque place. This matter lies on the same shelf as the Boeing situation, where essential safety tech preventing their planes from stalling is an costly option to be ticked by airline companies.

It’s the signs of our time: these kind of things are a result of unethically mastered greed: we all have a typically human need of having more, doing more, experiencing more, but most of us draw a instinctive line at it becoming at the cost of other individuals. Humans have reigned without that line for ages.

Capitalism as it is practised and glorified by the American world dominating (stagnant) imperialism is just one big pathetic joke.

This Suckerberg is an idiot, but all the users that don’t seem to care: his Facebook is nothing without them.

I am more concerned/worried/upset about FB and other social media to be a norm, really. A norm without scrutiny for their platform.

We don’t need this BS social media to activate our individual marketing, up to the extend of mass narcissism.
 
  • Like
Reactions: luvbug
How can they be sure that no one copied the records? Seems cause for a password update request to me. Duh!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marekul
Not storing passwords in plaintext is something they teach you in your first year of Computer Science in college. The developers at Facebook are just hackers, plain and simple, NOT software engineers.

Glad I deleted my FB account years ago. No regrets.

Heck, Facebook should not even KNOW your password. It should be salted and hashed locally, and the hash should be transmitted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fluamsler
What database software are they using? They all have password fields that are encrypted and not in plain text. Fail.
[doublepost=1553219443][/doublepost]Let see if they really notify anyone to change their password.
 
Wow this thread is full of immature hatred against a single person.
Most people are willing to have their data be shared as long as the service is free to use. And there are million of free services.

So what if service is free? We're supposed to celebrate that it's free to be pwned by someone clever enough to take advantage of a corporation's having left passes in the clear in a warehouse of customer data?

FB says no evidence anyone used the data. Their "trust me" line wears thin.

Anway how is it immature hatred for people to push back against a huge corporation's extreme carelessness?

Even if "most" people might not give a damn, the gross negligence of using real passwords in the clear for some temporary test bed setup (which is probably what happened) is stunning. They were apparently real accounts, not generated test data as would have been appropriate (and more expensive to create).

By now FB could have built (and maybe have built) a proper test setup with generated "fake" data to mess around with. Yet still somehow they left this artifact laying around with a couple million real passes extracted from customer setups? Inquiring minds will want to know more about what and how and why this breach ever occurred, never mind why left to exist so long.

Consciousness of security seems to have been raised in the general public at least a little by all the media attention that has ensued over not only data breaches but coverage of congressional hearings related to corporate responsibility for data security. It might not be accurate any more to say "most" people don't care, even though I still suspect that's true...

But caring or not isn't the point, is it. Not if you are the owner of one of those passwords and you do care. And unsurprisingly, as I'm sure Equifax discovered, people who generally don't care about data breaches do rather suddenly tend to care when it's their data out there. It's not right to call them immature if they raise hell when they find out about it.
 
Your comment provides the correct focus for this news. It shows the differences between two major companies and what drives them (despite Zuck's current crocodile tears over the loss of user privacy).

Apple is all about its users (and our money), so its focus is all about the users, including and especially things that are important to us, such as security. They actually lead the pack on that one, as time and time again they refuse to build back doors into their products. We are Apple's client.

Facebook is all about its advertisers - a surprise to no one. So it shouldn't be that unusual to see stories like this. They had those passwords in cleartext because it never occurred to them to do otherwise. To "do otherwise" would have meant operating by an impulse that just wasn't there - to do good by its users.

To put it more clearly: we are Facebooks' users, but that doesn't not equate to client. We are most assuredly not their client. Someone else is.

This.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Glockworkorange
I dont feel bad for Zuckerberg for a second over the autobahn speed dumpster fire car crash that is Facebook that none of us can look away from.

Karma is so frigging beautiful. And to think, the demise of Zuck/FB is only in its earliest phase. Popcorn.gif

Good luck with that new privacy-centric platform pitch too, credible Lizardman! ;)

He'll be lucky to go the way of Tom; irrelevant. In more likelihood, jail time and litigation issues / scandals piling up until his old age. He certainly will not have gotten the last laugh, proverbially speaking.

I think in the end, Tom wasn't just everyone's friend on MySpace, he was indirectly everyone's friend IRL.

The platform caving on itself was a great 'avante-garde' gift to humanity; Nobel Peace Prize worthy imo!

And while I engage in debate often in polarizing pol threads, I think we *all* can rally behind the fact both sides are equally furious (for different reasons) at Facebook... Maybe thats the sort of common ground unity we need?
It seems like every week—last week was the NZ thing (got left up on FB for like 20 hours) and this week it’s passwords.

Maybe the whole pivot to privacy was just Zuck throwing in the towel on this mode of social media and charting a course for private comms. Personally, I think that’s giving too much credit to him, but I’m trying to be more of an optimist.
 
Yes. At this point, storing non-hashed passwords should be a criminal offense. Period.
I agree and don't want to defend this terrible company, but they did not intentionally store the passwords in clear text. Apparently the passwords just inadvertently landed in some log files together with other form input data.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.