JahBoolean
Suspended
What I never understood was the reason people got mad for the data theft but not the behavioural modification...
Yet you’ve been replaced by bots to show ever increasing user numbers…Honestly, I wonder when Marky sold his soul to get that green because he seems completely oblivious to why Facebook is hated, why it is a terrible product for society in general, and why it destroys the lives of so many people. I deleted my Facebook/"meta" page a a while ago and it has been the best thing I could have done.
I want to both like your comment as well as say it made me LOL.I'm not sure why, but I thought of the movie Soylent Green while reading this article.
Basing your conclusions about what is correct or incorrect on the number of people you know (who happen to agree with you) is a logical fallacy called the “Argument by Weight of Numbers”. If 8 billion people share your belief that the Moon is made of cheese, I am still correct to state that the Moon is not made of cheese; even if I won’t have as many friends or Likes as you by saying it.
I'll never understand why people use Facebook.
Because the real world is too scary despite the vast availability of vaccines for those who want it. Do you know how to make control easier than everyone in their little pods at home suckling Zuck's teat?Is anyone actually interested in a metaverse? Wtf is the point of recreating the real world into a fake world? Seems so depressing and dystopian.
Clearly their profits show something differentZuckerberg is absolutely crazy. Is he really the only one who doesn’t see that Facebook/Meta is a terrible and hated company?
Bingo.One of the most hated companies, yet everyone and their moms are still using it…
“here for it”? Don’t you mean “there for it”?I mean bottom line is that the metaverse is coming, and a lot of people are here for it!
It's like the people who wouldn't upgrade to iPhone because it had no keyboard. I'm sure many did eventually.
That's the metaverse imo
Because their behaviour has been mod…mod…modified.What I never understood was the reason people got mad for the data theft but not the behavioural modification...
“here for it”? Don’t you mean “there for it”?
There’s no guarantee that the customer service is efficient! Most online firms honestly have really crappy customer service. Amazon, for instance, honestly has some pretty awful customer service (it can be very hard to trigger a customer service step or get ahold of a customer service agent), but they manage to sidestep a variety of customer service complaints with a customer-placating approach (being quick to issue refunds, for instance). Google’s customer support is famously awful, even for their paid users, but most users never encounter an issue that pushes them over the edge of contacting a customer service agent.Instead of a Genius bar, you get an Enema Bar. Apple Genius is now Agent (Surname) they wear a basic black suit with a black tie and sunglasses. Customer service is cold, emotionless but efficient.
But NFTs seem to be full of hot air to me. The token isn’t associated with a real world object, there’s not an ownership link that guarantees that ownership of the NFT imparts ownership of the physical object represented by the token. (It reminds me of a lot of some of the paper gold investment scams you see, where the issuer doesn’t allow you to redeem your paper for the gold that supposedly backs it.) Honestly, a lot of crypto investors are incredibly naive (having minimal investment experience with non-crypto assets), and you see a lot of the old equities or commodities investment scams showing up with a crypto twist. Pump and dump is so prevalent in the altcoin space these days, for instance. Ownership of an NFT strikes me as being a lot like ownership of real estate or clothing in Second Life, which is really virtually identical to buying some IAP in a freemium game, only there’s a floating exchange rate between the in-game currency and real money and IAP can be transferred between users causing the game to feature an economy simulator. Consider, on the other hand, domain names. There’s a clear way to validate ownership of domains, as well as a clear mechanism for ensuring that the owner of the domain name is the holder of the real world copyright. So there’s the ownership link, and it’s transferable and fungible in a way that Second Life digital assets aren’t.I am curious, but the metaverse they are describing seems to be the way we are headed … NFT’s … people are also creating NFT items inside digital worlds .. similar to Meta but called Earth2,0 or something like that. There seems to be an interest in holing up with our phones and social media. So feels like they are going to have everyone logged into a 4-D world owning land, art and tons of items and things via NFT’s. Sounds very sci-fi, but that is where it is headed unless something happens to change the course. Movies and books have been saying it, but technology is now catching up for a new advanced version of virtual reality. Look at how we are obsessed with phones and digital games, apps, etc. The next step is to somehow plug into the “net” along with everyone else.
Also back to NFT’s again… they boggle my mind because I don’t get it, but they are now selling nikes and other high end brand items ..digital .. and people are buying it! Pair of nikes that you can own and not get dirty by wearing…
Maybe it is just more efficient for us to turn inward into ourselves more and it is a new facet of human evolution. Who knows, but there just seems to be this push to all digital that is gaining steam.
Guess that is my attempt to answer the why?