Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I have lost all trust in Apple.

I can't believe Apple would purposefully slow down phones, then try to make it seem as if they were trying to prevent slowdowns and protect battery longevity, when they purposefully put crappy/small batteries in iPhones. They are doing this just to make sure recurring revenues are in full control.

To think people on this forum think that Apple providing a discount is good enough...when Apple has literally stole billions of dollars by deceiving its customers. I have friends who were told by genius idiots that it was time to purchase a new iPhone, with a side of Apple Care.

Steve Jobs - We really miss you man. You weren't necessarily a saint, but you never would have done this.
LOL you are right. Steve would have up'ed the price to $99 and told you/convinced you that that's what you really needed to pay in the first place for battery replacements. :D (JK no flaming needed here)
 
I believe what I've seen with my own devices. Fully charged battery, inside 72F house and CPUDasherX showed 911 Mhz, changed battery and it shows 1848 Mhz. All with no other apps running. Friends phone went from 600 Mhz to 1848 Mhz when battery swapped.

What reason do you have for believing CPU Dasher X is measuring a change in CPU speed due to the throttling feature? Isn't it true that CPU Dasher X could show changes to CPU speed prior to iOS 10.1.2?
 
Well of course. If you have a toy car with used up batteries it will run slow always until you replace the batteries. Nothing new there. That's how battery operated devices have always worked :)

it is a bit different for electronic devices... simple example, a digital watch or a battery powered digital alarm clock... do they start keeping incorrect time as battery gets old or do they just shut off?
 
ive always wondered that myself, as I was taught impedance was total resistance in an AC circuit, that included capacitive and inductive reactance. Without a frequency with the voltage, XL and XC are zero. So DC would be just resistance since it has no frequency.

DC circuits do have inductance and capacitance, but I just wanted to clarify that isn't what the problem is for the iPhone.

There is still inductance in DC systems. Inductance occurs any time there is a change in the flow of current through a circuit. For AC systems, the current is constantly completely changing direction. In DC, it still goes through changes such as when the flashlight goes from off to on. The impedance determines how quickly the current can go from 0 to whatever is required within the circuit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iSilas and jjack50
I have lost all trust in Apple.

I can't believe Apple would purposefully slow down phones, then try to make it seem as if they were trying to prevent slowdowns and protect battery longevity, when they purposefully put crappy/small batteries in iPhones. They are doing this just to make sure recurring revenues are in full control.

To think people on this forum think that Apple providing a discount is good enough...when Apple has literally stole billions of dollars by deceiving its customers. I have friends who were told by genius idiots that it was time to purchase a new iPhone, with a side of Apple Care.

Steve Jobs - We really miss you man. You weren't necessarily a saint, but you never would have done this.

This is getting blown out of proportions.

First, if you lost all trust in Apple, move on. It's just a computer company and there are many other solutions on the market that will meet your computing needs. I doubt you'll find a company that provides better user experience. If you do and you're happy then more power to you.

We all know that this forum would blow up with people being angry at Apple if their iPhone 6 was shutting down. So, Apple slows down the phone during peak time. The synthetic benchmarks that people are posting are not reflective of real life usage. In reality that page you wanted to open or the app that you were loading took 0.03 second longer to load. Big deal. It's a pretty sweet trade off against having the phone shut down unexpectedly.

It would be nice to know what's happening. It's an awesome feature and Apple should have been more open about it, but that's the only complaint that I can find. Give users the option to service the battery or enjoy reduced performance to prolong the life of the product. Simple, really.

Steve Jobs told everyone they were holding the phone "wrong" when the iPhone 4 antenna design flaw was discovered. He would have done this and has done these kinds of things before. Don't be naive.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I upgraded a failing battery about 7months ago. iPhone 6 was fine.
WHY then after upgrading to iOS 11, phone becomes sluggish, typing on the keyboard sometimes doesn’t give feedback for SEVERAL SECONDS until it spits out a burst of text in one shot (sometimes even missing CAPS changes), switching apps is a long ordeal. Don’t get me started on Apple Car (became an unusable slow crap), Siri while driving sometimes takes A MINUTE to process a simple command such as “call John using FaceTime audio”, etc...
Alright MR, I’m planning to use the battery replacement program, sure why not, let’s give it a try, maybe the batteries are so massively crap that they snap not at one year use but at 6months.
I still have the feeling that, after the upgrade, issues with sluggishness, keyboard, AppleCar features, etc won’t magically disappear.
 
A very well written article.

To make it complete, you also need to explain why the models which are not affected by this, do not require this throttling.

Cause the issue here is The design of newer iPhones, with thinner batteries and not battery tech itself.
 
Last edited:
Everyone’s aware of the audience in MacRumors. I wouldn’t be surprised if Apple is indirectly involved.
Do you have any objective evidence whatsoever that proves your accusation? The gauziness of "wouldn't be surprised" doesn't mitigate questioning the integrity of the accused.

It's a comprehensive, focused article which strives to avoid speculation and opinion. I'm sure it'll be appreciated as a primer on the issue, especially by those who have little time on their hands. It doesn't claim to be 'the be all and end all', nor does it preclude one from continuing their investigation.
 
You forgot the following questions:

1. Why is the throttling being applied just last year, after 10 years of iPhones? What happened to the 5s for example?

2. Could there be a hardware issue/design with regards to quality/capability of battery Apple is using and this throttling is just a workaround due to the bad/cheap design?

3. Why isn't Apple aiming at higher battery quality like Samsung is now adopting for S8? A typical battery degrades to 80% after 2 years, Samsung's new design only goes down to 95%.

Nobody is asking any questions around here. They take the things as they are and take every lie Apple tells as fact. I had the same questions as you, but nobody answered.

I can add a fourth question:

4. Why has the battery life on older iPhones (like the 7 Plus) suddenly dropped once iOS 11 came out? Could they want us to charge more times a day and destroy our fragile batteries faster?
 
starting with iOS 10.2.1
Can Apple and the media stop pretending they only started throttling old phones with iOS 10.2.1? It's been happening for years. I'm sitting here wondering if they purposely added "power management," just so they could avoid questions about why they are really slowing down *older phones.

*by older I mean as little as 6-12 months. Seriously, I noticed my 7 Plus slowing down in the weeks leading up to iPhone 8 and X announcement.
 
Part of it probably depends on the volume of batteries that could be supplied using that newer technology. It may need special manufacturing processes that aren't widespread yet at factories that produce lithium ion batteries.

You also need to remember that capacity isn't the only thing that can effect voltage supply to the CPU. Does the new Samsung technology change the point that voltage goes below nominal during a standard charge cycle, i.e., 20% or lower with standard lithium ion? Is the new Samsung technology impervious to cold conditions? Will it still degrade more quickly when exposed to high temperatures? Or the wrong voltage charger?

How about Apple use the same battery tech used in the iPad, since iPads arent getting throttled
 
I have to say..
on my 6s, had the battery replaced (free, part of the 6/6s program), then did a clean iOS install of 11 and the phone is badness fast. feels GREAT!
 
Last edited:
What reason do you have for believing CPU Dasher X is measuring a change in CPU speed due to the throttling feature? Isn't it true that CPU Dasher X could show changes to CPU speed prior to iOS 10.1.2?

I have zero reason not to believe it. I got new battery in my 6s and it shows 1848 Mhz everytime now. Thats plenty of proof for me to believe.
 
it is a bit different for electronic devices... simple example, a digital watch or a battery powered digital alarm clock... do they start keeping incorrect time as battery gets old or do they just shut off?
Well yes they could start loosing time. My clock in the house does (analog). But seriously a clock is no where even close to as demanding on power as a computer in your pocket. So this analogy isn't really useful. Sorry. Point being, if a battery is old/aged/depleted enough to where it cannot supply the needed current, yes it could stay in a throttled state always IF the circumstances Apple says activates it are existing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iSilas and pmhparis
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.