Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I've had my iphone 7 shut itself down repeatedly in weather between 40-60 degrees. I visited the genius bar where it was confirmed there were no hardware issues. As Apple's first question is typically "Do you have the latest software?", I was sure to make sure I did. The only solution offered was resetting the phone entirely which I was not interested in doing. I was thanked by the employee for not getting angry at him as this is apparently often the case when customers have had this issue. Little did I know that the having the latest software was actually the reason for this occurring. I updated my iOS this week and was able to shoot multiple timelapse videos in the brutal East Coast weather yesterday with no shutdowns or rapid depletion of battery life. I could understand the phone shutting down if left in the summer sun or brutal winter cold, but the hardware should be able to perform in relatively mild temperatures.
 
  • Like
Reactions: idunn
Apple recognized that iPhones unexpectedly shutting down on users is not a good experience, and starting with iOS 10.2.1, it quietly implemented a power management feature to prevent these shutdowns. The update was released in January 2017, and a month later, Apple said it saw a major reduction in shutdowns.
If I'd been aware at the time that it was the state of the battery that was causing the shutdowns, I would have insisted on a warranty replacement. Which I guess is why Apple kept it quiet to prevent a deluge of battery replacement claims. :(
 
I have zero reason not to believe it. I got new battery in my 6s and it shows 1848 Mhz everytime now. Thats plenty of proof for me to believe.

If that's true, then CPU Dasher X isn't working properly. The CPU isn't going to run at max clock speed all the time.
 
Just give me the option to switch off the throttling.
Yeah they could add a new switch and label it 'Random shutdown' off/on. Or just add the feature to the existing Low power mode and add to the description "Phone may also randomly shut down at any given time"

Conclusion: Apple shouldn't allow older phones to update to newer iOS if they can't support it. just release updates for security. Throttling phones down in order to give new features isn't an experience. I love Apple products but i'm calling lies with Apple's statement.
May want to re-read the info regarding this topic. The throttling was not added to 'give new features' but for an entirely different reason.
 
seems with every new product release Apple winds up with a new controvercy, people look forward to it

way to go APPLE
 
Here's what you need to know: Just keep your phone plugged in at all times of the day, even if its charged.

The only time I let my phone off the charger is when I'm sleeping at night, or out and about.

YOu realize thats bad for the battery constantly charging it .... cause the way it works is it just constantly trickles in power, then uses the battery, then trickles in power repeat. Being plugged in with 100% battery doesnt provide a pass through. Most articles Ive read ultimately suggest to basically never let your battery decharge super low below around 25% and re-charge it to about 90/95%

p.s. I can confirm this as in one of my old iPhones I did the exact same thing you are doing..and the battery crapped out in 1.5 years. I was shocked to learn leaving it plugged in was worse than simply charging it as needed.
 
Last edited:
Yeah they could add a new switch and label it 'Random shutdown' off/on. Or just add the feature to the existing Low power mode and add to the description "Phone may also randomly shut down at any given time"

May want to re-read the info regarding this topic. The throttling was not added to 'give new features' but for an entirely different reason.

according to apple it was a feature added in 10.2.1 for the 6/6s
 
Last edited:
I don't think Apple did this to screw over their customers either. But it does irritate me in a massively huge way to know that I upgraded to yet another slowed-down iPhone (currently a 6s Plus) when I could have just upgraded the battery. So yes, Apple did screw up, and the $30 replacement is a step in the right direction.

Apple also could have avoided this by simply designing a phone that has a removeable battery. They already have the most secure OSs, and while they aren't fool-proof, they are largely idiot-proof. I find it very hard to beleive that Jonny Ive - for all his talent - couldn't design an iPhone that has that one feature.

But bear in mind that this used to be a company that was about both form and function. Not anymore. Sad.
Good points, but remember Apple is in the business of making money. Of course they could have designed a removable cover, but they want you to upgrade to a new phone, not replace the battery in your existing one. How many people would have kept their old phones if they could easily replace the battery themselves? I'd bet a lot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iSilas and idunn
I think many people here still misunderstand what it going on

First, Samsung doesn’t have special battery technology. The chemistry is exactly the same. They deplete the same way. There is no way to change it except to use a different battery chemistry. It is very likely that Samsung and other manufacturers use similar power management methods.

Second, Apple uses batteries made in Japan.

Lastly, relax, most of the time it takes a seriously beat battery for power management to engage throttle. Get it replaced for $30. The amount of hyperbole on here makes it seem crazy that a heavily used battery cycled at least daily for three years should wear out... 500 cycles is a lot for a lipo battery.
 
The issue is about DISCLOSURE. You should disclose to your users the repercussions of them upgrading an older phone so they can make an informed decision. Also if they are coming out with all these new diagnostic tools to achieve better transparency, why wasn't that done prior to the update that slowed the phones down?
 
  • Like
Reactions: MyMacintosh
It's going to be near impossible to prove in court that Apple slowed down devices so that customers would upgrade. Doesn't mean there won't be some damages awarded because they didn't inform customers or because performance was impacted. But proving they did it to cause upgrades is a much tougher task for prosecutors.

At the end of the day Apple could have let phones shut down randomly (which could cause customers to upgrade) or they could have implemented measurers such as they did which affects performance, at times (and which could cause customers to upgrade).

They only failing I can see so far is in the secrecy of what was done. Because it doesn't appear to me that this is even a battery (or other component) design flaw limited to one model of iPhone. But if there is a design flaw and the software "fix" is a coverup then it will be brought to light in the court hearings.

It's that they didn't DISCLOSE that they were doing it...that's the problem.
 
I think many people here still misunderstand what it going on

First, Samsung doesn’t have special battery technology. The chemistry is exactly the same. They deplete the same way. There is no way to change it except to use a different battery chemistry. It is very likely that Samsung and other manufacturers use similar power management methods.

Second, Apple uses batteries made in Japan.

Lastly, relax, most of the time it takes a seriously beat battery for power management to engage throttle. Get it replaced for $30. The amount of hyperbole on here makes it seem crazy that a heavily used battery cycled at least daily for three years should wear out... 500 cycles is a lot for a lipo battery.

Your blanket forgiveness is inspiring.
 
iPhone: quality parts that work in sync for safety, security and performance (yes that’s battery too).

Users: “hey I hate my phone shutting off.”

Apple: “ok we’ll make it so that at peak load usage, if it would shut off before, now will just slow slightly.”

User: “how dare you slow my phone during rare usage events! Just invest billions into new battery tech like Samsung!”


smh.

Yes but they didn't TELL the users in ADVANCE of them updating so they could make an INFORMED decision...
 
You forgot the following questions:

1. Why is the throttling being applied just last year, after 10 years of iPhones? What happened to the 5s for example.

This is particularly problematic. My wife's 5S is much faster than my 6. My phone started becoming slow around 6 months ago... just around the time the 10.2.1 update went out. Her battery runs out faster than mine, but I'll take the performance over the battery at this point. I can deal with plugging my phone in when I get home from work. I can't deal with my phone taking 10 seconds to open a text.

Though I guess that's the point, isn't it? If I can't deal with it, I'm more likely to spend on the new one.
 
or the app that you were loading took 0.03 second longer to load
Is your phone affected by this ? I suspect it's not or you wouldn't be making up times like that. Try the following sequence and time it (just by counting off the seconds):

- Open Photos app and select an image
- Start "timer"
- Tap the Share button
- Select Messages
- Once you can begin inputting a recipient, stop "timer"

Do this as quickly as your phone will allow you. How long does it take ?
 
yeah thanks apple ...traded in my 7 plus cause the battery was going on nov 17th...so thanks for getting my money on the 8 plus now....they should offer a partial refund for those of us that fell into this trap...lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: maurom
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.