Enjoy the fear mongering.
Guess the internet didn't work at all or wasn't conducive to innovation prior to 2015...right?
Actually there have been numerous examples of very bad behaviour from ISP's while under Title 1 classification. Ranging from extortion to manipulated web results. You've now given ISP's complete free reign over the internet and now you will see huge sweeping and quick damage done to your country and economy.
If you really don't understand the implications of this vote then I can show you links and try to explain it.
Prior to 2015 (or round about then) ISP's were atleast under Title 1 rules. Now they can do whatever they want.
-Harvest and sell all your private data
-Manipulate search results and web pages
-Throttle any competing services (Netflix etc) and webpages to be virtually useless
-Arbitary caps on whatever they want
-Even less funding for network improvements
-Charging extra for access to certain websites
Much of this has already happened. I believe Comcast got in trouble for trying to extort money from Netflix, as well at throttling them. ISP's have already injected code into websites. Data caps have been reintroduced. Under Title 2 more was spent on infrastructure improvements.
Huge billion dollar companies like Netflix, Google, Facebook etc would likely not exist today. The economic damage repealing net neutrality may well be measured in the trillions of dollars in the coming decades. This is absolutely catastrophic for anyone who believes in free speech, free markets and competition.
It doesn't need to be this way. Net neutrality and high speed unlimited internet is a reality in most of the developed world. Where I live in the UK (way out in the country) I have extremely fast unlimited excellent cheap internet that only gets faster for the same price.
Also don't even get me started on the $400bn given to ISP's to deploy a national fibre optic network across the US that they pocketed. Absolutely shocking behaviour.