Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
That never worked with my Apple Watch.
It didn’t work for me, so I checked and I didn’t have it turned on, doh. So yes it does work great. Don’t know what to tell you, you either don’t have it set up, or there is a hardware issue. Because it is awesome
 
I don't understand why so many want Face ID on a MBP.

I see benefits to both Face ID and touch, but if I had to choose, on the Mac, touch makes more sense. I'm noticing the lack of it on the mini 6, but we wake up a Mac by touching the keyboard, so reaching for the touch ID button is more seamless.
 
I am an auto hobbyist and like to read journals speacializing in cars. One day, i was reading through an article where the journalist went for a race track day with Porsche officials by invite.
So he tested thoroughly new 911 and made conclusions, that the refresh is really minor for the owners of previous gen 911. But the differences are substantially changing the car: you might notice it or not. Also he found imperfections, that could have been addressed with this new refresh but didn't.

When he asked the main engineer of Porsche 911, as to "why this wasn't implemented when it is so obvious to include?", engineer replied: "Well, we are not dumb people working out there. We know all the nuances and upgrades that needs to be done. Sometimes it is the case that techology is not ready to fulfill our dreams to come true in the car. But mostly, we have planned upgrade cycles and implementations for 20 years ahead. We know how the ideal 911 should look like and be. But if we present you today or next year that ideal 911 with all of our plans for 20 years, then everybody will buy that ideal 911. After that, who would we sell our new refreshed 911s if people already got the best previously?" Journalist concluded that it is reasonable and people should be aware if they want to be upgrading on every cycle.
 
OP is just spec-hunting. "wifi 6e"!!! What's the actual advantage though? Wifi 6 has 10gig throughput, theoretically and your Mac supports it. Anyone here have 10gig/s internet service? Bueller? So what does 6e bring? All of this:

In fact, WiFi 6E is identical to WiFi 6 with an addition of “E”, which stands for “Extended” — as in an extended number of the usable wireless band, the 6 GHz band. So simply put, WiFi 6E means WiFi 6 extended to the 6 GHz band. ... Unlike the crowded 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands, the wide-open 6 GHz spectrum is occupied only by efficient WiFi 6 connections, removing frustrations currently caused by overcrowding on many WiFi networks. Channels on the newly opened 6 GHz band also wouldn’t overlap with each other, greatly reducing network congestion.


So, if you have a lot of interference, yeah it would be nice. But if not... there's no there there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 88Keys
So there’s no explanation why a 3 year old 2018 iPad Pro got Face ID and NO notch, and somehow a new 2021 MacBook Pro needed a notch and NO FaceID and people swallowed that hook line and sinker.

Also, Apple failed to include HDMI 2.1, WiFi 6e, and Bluetooth 5.1 all of which have been around and Apple just forgot.

I guess we can hope for a refresh in 2022.
How do you sleep at night? This is terrible and catastrophic. Wow this is worst as people starving and sleeping on the streets. Wait no HDMI 2.1? This is earth shattering. And no 5.1 Bluetooth. That’s it.
 
It didn’t work for me, so I checked and I didn’t have it turned on, doh. So yes it does work great. Don’t know what to tell you, you either don’t have it set up, or there is a hardware issue. Because it is awesome
That was the first thing I tried, (turning it on). It could be a hardware issue on the watch, but everything else works well.
 
So there’s no explanation why a 3 year old 2018 iPad Pro got Face ID and NO notch, and somehow a new 2021 MacBook Pro needed a notch and NO FaceID and people swallowed that hook line and sinker.

Also, Apple failed to include HDMI 2.1, WiFi 6e, and Bluetooth 5.1 all of which have been around and Apple just forgot.

I guess we can hope for a refresh in 2022.
- iPad Pro has no notch but it has thick bezel. The notch is a trade off if you want slim bezel while maintaining acceptable webcam.

- It has been prove that current Face ID module is thinker than the lid of current MacBook Pro. Re-engineering is require. They probably won’t make the lid thicker since the chassis already thick as it is. The lid has to be light than the bottom body to make the weight balanced.

- Face ID would provide almost the same experience as Touch ID since you have to press or click something to trigger authentication anyway when making changes to the device, or buying something with Apple Pay. It will only benefit when unlock the device when authentication start automatically.

- I don’t know about HDMI 2.1 but Thunderbolts 4 ports should do the job fine.

- Wifi 6e and Bluetooth 5.1 are probably them holding stuff back.
 
All discussed thoroughly back in October and since, over and over, but some like to rehash things, over and over. Especially some with zero interest in the real answers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 88Keys and ericwn
There's another elephant in the room with regards to Face ID for the Mac - the lid is likely way too thin to fit the Face ID sensor.
I’d personally be ok with a Lid bump just as I’m ok with a Notch or the camera bump on the iPhone.
 
Because, if my calculations are correct, it’s roughly 8 trillion times more convenient than the Touch ID button.
By my calculations it is roughly 1.03x more convenient than Touch ID. When I’m using a laptop, my hands are already on it. When I’m using an external monitor+keyboard, my laptop is probably not positioned right for Face ID anyway.

And even then, apple’s solution is to just sell me a keyboard for TouchID.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ericwn
The current gen Face ID does not fit the current MBP 2021. The presence of a notch in the MBP is preparation to fit the next Gen Face ID components in the screen. There is a spacious room around the 1080p webcam. It was a wise decision to add the notch, not only because of manufacturing/engineering, because the customers would freak the f*ck out if they suddenly add one in the near future. It is probably making it’s debute in 2023.

That being said, when i saw the new iMac’s power adapter with built-in Ethernet i was excited. Too bad the MBP 2021 didn’t have a built-in Ethernet in their powerbricks.
 
By my calculations it is roughly 1.03x more convenient than Touch ID. When I’m using a laptop, my hands are already on it. When I’m using an external monitor+keyboard, my laptop is probably not positioned right for Face ID anyway.

And even then, apple’s solution is to just sell me a keyboard for TouchID.

I think that’s a good point since so many people use their notebooks docked to an external monitor anyway and a fingerprint scanner or Apple Watch just make more sense to unlock the computer with.
 
So there’s no explanation why a 3 year old 2018 iPad Pro got Face ID and NO notch, and somehow a new 2021 MacBook Pro needed a notch and NO FaceID and people swallowed that hook line and sinker.

Also, Apple failed to include HDMI 2.1, WiFi 6e, and Bluetooth 5.1 all of which have been around and Apple just forgot.

I guess we can hope for a refresh in 2022.
Just simply buy a windows laptop that has all that then hackintosh it. Why complain about things that you can easily find alternatives.
 
I don't understand why so many want Face ID on a MBP.

I'm guessing for the same reasons they want it on iPhones and iPads ??‍♂️ Why would you NOT want it? Remember, it's not only for logging in but also anything else your password is required for.
 
Same.

If Face ID was to activate automatically like people assume, the user wouldn’t be able to control basic things like the login screen or purchases - they would just initiate. Therefore to get around this, you would still need to click on a button to tell MacOS that you want to, for instance, make a purchase.

Touch ID doesn’t have this issue because you have to actively choose to put your finger over the sensor to activate it; to me at least that actually seems like the more convenient option.

This is simply incorrect. If this were an issue, it would be an issue on iPhones and iPads as well, right? And it's not, right? That's because you have to click a confirm button BEFORE Face ID activates. So you can scratch this off - it's a non-issue.
 
TouchID can be just as fast and more secure. But anyway, faceID doesn't work at all if you need to be wearing a mask right now. I don't use either in Windows, I just use a PIN or a password, it always works, with a mask, with a dirty finger, whatever.

Two things: 1. If you have an Apple Watch, it's a non-issue. 2. You don't have to use Face ID just because it's there. You can always type in your password instead.
 
Because, if my calculations are correct, it’s roughly 8 trillion times more convenient than the Touch ID button.
Touch ID is also used for purchases online. If I accidentally press Apple Pay on checkout, I still need to press Touch ID to confirm. With Face ID it would just go through with the payment. Apple could add a click to confirm when ready button on checkout but that kinda goes against the smoothness of Face ID.

Also Touch ID allows for fast user switching if you have more than one user on a computer.
 
I'm guessing for the same reasons they want it on iPhones and iPads ??‍♂️ Why would you NOT want it? Remember, it's not only for logging in but also anything else your password is required for.

I personally don't care either way. But Face ID would just seem redundant on any type of Macbook.
 
Instead of a 4th thunderbolt port that could be used for anything, Apple caved to the dongle whiners and gave you a internal hub with a substandard HDMI port (2.1 requires the full interface) and a buggy SD card reader instead.
 
Two things: 1. If you have an Apple Watch, it's a non-issue.
As I've said, Apple watch unlock hasn't worked for me. Maybe it's because I'm using a V5 Apple watch, not a 6.

You don't have to use Face ID just because it's there. You can always type in your password instead.
These days, the only device I have face-id activated is on my iPhone. My android phone uses TouchID. My full sized iPads I don't even lock. My iPad mini, I use TouchID. My MBA has TouchID. And my Intel Mini, I only log in one time, no autolock. (they're all physically secure)

I'm not really complaining in this thread about FaceID, just saying I prefer TouchID as it seems to work better for me. That said, when I first used TouchID years ago, it never worked well, but things get better with new hardware all the time. FaceID may get to that level, who knows.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.