FireArse said:At the end of the day - if this thing is going to be media friendly, H.264 will be on everybody's lips.
Thinking about it again, Apple could make two lines:
- Single Core desktop (replacement for PPC version)
- Dual Core Media version for H.264 and the bells and whistles
Apple may want to go in two directions roughly the same product line, headless Mac AND the new Media PVR based machine. Hopefully, they'll do it, and charge some sort of premium for customers to do it.
Hell, if this doesn't work - I wanna see if a 1.42GHz G4 (or possibly overclocked to 1.5GHz ) can play 1080p in MPEG2 - if yes, then il encode films that way and play off the network - sod H.264, too much to liscence and too computationally expensive. Id rather spend the money on a second hand mini 1.42GHz G4 and another 500GB HDD for my PowerMac.
michaeljs said:Why? My Humax PVR records 40hrs of SD PAL to a 80gig HD - Tivo works similarly. DVcam compression is gives 3.6Mb/sec, so why couldn't a mac mini tivo killer record a tv signal to the hard drive and play out as a straight video signal to a telly - its just one extra connector. Problem is you're likely thrash the HD over time which means you'd be replacing your computers HD more regularly and thus increase the risk of data. If you want a system that does both I'd want two hard drives.
Di9it8 said:I am using Elgato EyeTV 410 and can save to HD 264. Ive been using it for over a year now and the quality is amazing
foofan said:Just got word from a friend in Cali that Apple is going to announce along with boombox, that AC/DC's entire catalog will be available on itunes and they will perform two songs on feb 28th!!!!!!!!!!
Agreeance.mozmac said:I would like the Media Center to be a product of its own. Making a Mini that can do all these things would make it too expensive, nullifying Apple's entire reason for making the Mini; price. They can use the similar, small, sexy design, but they need to call it a different name. That way they don't have to feel guilty about putting high end hardware in the box. Please don't cripple your Media Center with the Mini name!
hyperpasta said:How about this? The mini does NOT become a Media Center. Instead, it gets an IR reveiver and Front Row like every other Mac. The big news is that you can "stream" Front Row to a new AirPort-enabled device that plugs into your TV. From any Mac, not just a mini. This functionality, along with many other improvements, is delivered for free as Front Row 2.
mozmac said:I would like the Media Center to be a product of its own. Making a Mini that can do all these things would make it too expensive, nullifying Apple's entire reason for making the Mini; price. They can use the similar, small, sexy design, but they need to call it a different name. That way they don't have to feel guilty about putting high end hardware in the box. Please don't cripple your Media Center with the Mini name
Foxer said:Except when they dropped the click wheel (in part at least) on the 2G iPod in favor of the row of buttons.
autrefois said:They will not be happy until they have enough money to own the world!
I personally don't think there's a real need for an Apple speaker system, but I assume the idea would be that they can make it better (quality, design, and/or ease of use) than the competition. Consumers would likely be willing to pay as much or more than they pay for third-party speakers if they knew Apple made it.
Lancetx said:My prediction for the new Mac minis...
Core Solo processors, same Front Row software with Remote as the iMac & MacBook Pro (with no DVR capabilities), no built-in iPod dock, Radeon X1300 graphics with 64MB VRAM, 8x DL SuperDrive in the top of the line model, and same price points ($499-699 US) as the current models. To expect much more (at those prices) is undoubtedly wishful thinking.
For sure, if all this was just a portable speaker system that you could stick your ipod into, it'd be ultra lame. BUT, what I'm hoping this will be is a receiver/speaker system for iTunes that combines the wireless capabilities of Airport Express, the click wheel interface of the iPod, and some solid quality speakers.paz117 said:Yea, I'm with you on that one.
It's pretty sad if all this is acutally about an actual iPod boombox.
Spanky Deluxe said:What I'm looking for in a mac mini is:
Core Duo (any model, the 1.66Ghz one would be fine)
Radeon X1600 or similar (it'll probably be a X1300 though which will be fine I guess)
512MB RAM
160GB 3.5" drive (the bigger form factor because you get more bytes/buck)
Combo Drive (Superdrive CTO or more expensive model machine)
Bluetooth and Airport standard on everything but the base model
Frontrow + Remote
People on this forum are ALWAYS disappointed; it's the nature of the beast. Everyone thinks Apple should make a product that pleases them and them only. Probably the biggest single disappointment on this forum that I've witnessed is the original ipod. (The last few iterations of G4 powerbooks have come close.)nathan2301 said:[snip]
Having said that I could be wrong but I just get the feeling alot of you will be dissapointed when they announce a new Mac Mini.
Prove me wrong Apple, Prove me wrong (please)![]()