w00master said:Definitely respect your opinion here, but here's mine:
1. Firefox is universal. Not, universal as in "Universal Binary," but universal as in multi-platform. It's the same on the PC; it's the same on the Mac, and it's the same on Linux. Since I use all three, there is absolutely no comparison here.
2. Extensions. Sure, Safari has a lot of "plug-ins" and scripts, etc, but it does not even come close to firefox's extensions. Adblock on Safari is good, but it doesn't close to the "original" Firefox's adblock. Additionally because of Firefox's "universality," nearly all extensions work cross platform. Safari definitely cannot do this.
3. Search Engines. Yeah, you can "add" search engines to Safari, but if you take a look at the list that's available for Firefox it simply doesn't even come close.
4. Open Source. This to me is the biggest plus. There's an enormous devoted community on all fronts: Linux, Windows, and OS X that supports this amazing browser.
In the end it comes down to personal taste. I definitely agree with you that Firefox isn't very "Mac-like," but for me the plusses far outweigh this issue. I simply cannot live without this browser. For me, being a multi-platform user, Firefox brings me back to sanity. It's something consistent in the three (very different) OS environments. You can't get that with Safari.
w00master
Yeah, for multi-platform stuff Safari aint so good.... Only one point of disagreement. I use PithHelmet and SafariPlus together, which means I rarely see ads and I get no dialog boxes. What I've seen for FireFox requires more user input. But like you said, that's the sort of thing that may be in 1.6 with all the amateur/pro devs working on it. Still, Opera is also multi platform AND more secure, so I would recommend Opera over Firefox even then. I never found any worthwhile extensions for FF, but then, there's probably more since I last looked.