Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Notice that my signature states I am still running on a 2015 box of cheezit crackers? I'm several models behind without any plans to upgrade any time soon...
Fortunately, I've turned off the viewing of signatures (in fact, doesn't mine say that?), because I could not care lesssss what kind of crackers you run on. In fact, nobody cares. :)
 
It works the other way too. If you're displaying something round, then the square screen wastes space. SO WHAT.

View attachment 679615

Also, it's already been pointed out that the smaller Apple Watch sacrifices screen space compared to its larger brother. Yet millions of people bought them anyway. The amount of visible text is NOT A FACTOR IN REAL LIFE.

View attachment 679614

Moreover, the size of the bezel is just as important as the shape. And the front of the Apple Watch is over 50% bezel. It's just hidden by all that strategically placed black.

View attachment 679613
All I'll say is you need to make the circle watch bigger to fit the same amount of pixels as a square one regardless of bezels/size etc. Imagine how much more you could get on the 360 if it wasn't round. Whether the display shows a round object is down to the designer (I mean, how do you get a square clock to look nice? - that's why most are round).

It's a big so what. I'm sure future Apple watches will have closers to a bezel-less design. Why there is quite a big bezel currently is a mystery (unless technically needed for a bigger battery).
 
All I'll say is you need to make the circle watch bigger to fit the same amount of pixels as a square one regardless of bezels/size etc. Imagine how much more you could get on the 360 if it wasn't round. Whether the display shows a round object is down to the designer (I mean, how do you get a square clock to look nice? - that's why most are round).

It's a big so what. I'm sure future Apple watches will have closers to a bezel-less design. Why there is quite a big bezel currently is a mystery (unless technically needed for a bigger battery).

Until Apple eleminates the huge bezel, then it's moot. Current round watches display much more than the Apple Watch is presently capable.

29349987561_a795b9c843_o_d.jpg


And you should go look at Cartier's Tank watches. That's pretty much their signature watch, and there are dozens of models.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kdarling
Imagine how much more you could get on the 360 if it wasn't round.

How many times do we have to do this dance? :D

Again, it depends on what you're displaying. Quite a few of Apple's own Watch apps use circular items which would fit better on a circular display.

apple-round-apps.png


Also imagine things like radar displays, or a map of search points around you. A circle is much better for those.

Yes, rectangles are marginally better for lots of text, but a wrist device is only supposed to be for quick notifications anyway. If people actually only cared about seeing more text, then they'd be buying screens like this:

gear-s-msg2.jpg


Guess why they don't? I think it's because style is more important to most people.

Finally, the nail in the coffin of the silliness in this whole discussion, is the fact that people ALREADY CHOOSE A SMALLER TEXT DISPLAY when they buy the smaller Apple Watch model.

Apple-Watch-42mm-vs-38mm-4.png


Again, this is because people are far more interested in how a watch looks on THEIR wrist, than by how much text they see without scrolling.

In real life, the shape doesn't matter as far as usefulness. Either shape works fine. It's all more more about a style choice. If/when Apple comes out with round, we'll see how much better it sells. It's all just like with the larger phone display debates. Some people hated on those until Apple started selling them. You'd think they'd learn from history.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.