And daily driving close to 600hp is, well, fun to say the least.
You can't tease us like that and not provide details
And daily driving close to 600hp is, well, fun to say the least.
You can't tease us like that and not provide details![]()
The "wound" I was referring to is your blatantly incorrect statements about the technology and performance of Corvettes and Camaros.Trust me, there's no wound to throw salt in. I'm quite happy with my sports cars. Have a good day.
Nice inflammatory comment. I don't own a corvette, only driven them. My colleague who does own a c5, whom I've been on a track with, is constantly tweaking the camber I the front, the toe in the rear, spring rate and has replaced anti roll bars to decrease his understeer. That's what I have always felt driving those cars, a sense of plowing forward. Hope the rest of your day goes well.
...has always been known for throwing all of their resources into niche markets while letting their mainstream moneymakers wither on the vine.
Many say it is actually a step backwards. Don't take my word for it. Review after review questioned the same thing. ... It's a great example of ... design by committee.
That's the problem... GM always has excuses why old technology is better like pushrod engines, and then eventually follows the rest years down the line.
...but I have never seen style go so backwards in one design cycle. Yes they still sell well, but I am totally disappointed with the direction they took. Many others feel the same way.
The Government bailout let them continue with very few real structural changes made. They cut a few brands, but the culture of the corporation is still screwed up.
Also I am not against American vehicles since I drive a 2014 Ford Explorer.
The "wound" I was referring to is your blatantly incorrect statements about the technology and performance of Corvettes and Camaros.
The fact is that both of these cars easily beat Japanese and German cars costing nearly double or more in real racetrack racing. Again, you seem to be implying that these cars do not perform on the same level as European or Japanese cars, I have posted numerous lap times that show that these do compete with , if not beat some of the worlds best cars. If you disagree, please feel free to provide some evidence to that effect.
I'm stirring up ****? I couldn't care less about corvettes. Again, just stated I preferred the mid engine setup. Enjoy your car.Sounds like his setup still needs work. I'd start with investigating tires and driving habits.
Despite the basic configuration being the same the c5 was signifigantly improved on with the c5z,c6, c6z, c7, c7z, etc.
I have a c5 on c6z struts and sways here with pilot super sport tires, it doesn't plow. The body is a limp noodle though, however that has been addressed in every other variant going forward, including the c5z.
My boat of an ls3 sedan with worse weight distribution than a corvette also has a solid neutral feel with rotation easily induced.
Other than stirring up **** and offering nothing other than anecdotal evidence you still havent given proof to the poor handling of the modern american v8 (dodges are easy pickings here, but not relevant to the thread) or mentioned what awesome mid engines you have.
OHV vs OHC is not one is better than the other scenario. they both have their applications:
OHC:
Plusses:
1) less complexity of valve train (no pushrods)
2) Slightly Higher RPM due to less mass on the lobe/spring
3) Possibilty of variable degrees of overlap if VVT is used with DOHC.
4) More Valve area (4 valves) per piston diameter
Negatives:
1) Taller, larger motor
2) More overall valve-train rotating mass (especially in a Vee Motor, with up to 4 cams)
3) Higher center of gravity for motor
4) More complexity of cam drive system
OHV:
Plusses:
1) Smaller lighter motor
2) Lower center of gravity
3) Less cams (1 vs 4)
4) Simpler Cam Drive
Negatives:
1) More complexities in valve train past the lobe
2) Slightly lower RPM (more valve float)
3) Can have VVT, but no variable overlap
4) Less valve area per piston diameter.
However, some of these negatives are not applicable to a large displacement motor;
a GM v-8 typically has a large bore (Large piston diameter) so the benefit of multiple valves is lessened as there is sufficient over the piston area for 2 large valves. ( as seen in some high HP v8 applications)
Lower RPM is still acceptably high especially when using large displacement, as less torque multiplication is needed to make power
OHC is better for smaller bore engines to allow for multiple valves for more airflow,
OHV is better in a larger displacement engine (large bore).
Plus the GM V8 is usually lighter and more compact, with a lower center of gravity than may other companies v6's
I'm stirring up ****? I couldn't care less about corvettes. Again, just stated I preferred the mid engine setup. Enjoy your car.
Big heavy engine in the front with a ton of understeer...the American way. After driving lightweight mid engined cars for the last 10 years, I can't go back.
Wrong,Nah. Plow into a turn too fast and you'll know what I mean. Driven vettes around tracks and along the countryside, and that heavy front end sucks. I laugh at your idiotic comment.
ahhh you got hurt feelings. Poor baby.Wrong,
you made a false statement then have been backtracking the last 6 pages while everyone took turns saying you are talking out your ass.
Mostly I just think you drive as well as you debate.
ahhh you got hurt feelings. Poor baby.
And the funny part is how much effort you're putting into this...
can we get a pink corvette and understeer off the grand canyon together holding hands listening to heart?
Which is why I stopped responding.. Ignorance is truly bliss for some, and seems like its FBR at this point !This thread has really gone off the cliff.
So yes the Stingray is a nice vehicle, but it's a niche market and GM has always been known for throwing all of their resources into niche markets while letting their mainstream moneymakers wither on the vine.
Take that new Malibu your talking about and really compare it to the Malibu it replaced. Guess what? Many say it is actually a step backwards. Don't take my word for it. Review after review questioned the same thing. Second, compared to the other cars in it's class its sales have been mediocre at best. Even if you take away the Camry and Accord it fails to compete with the Fusion in technology, style and sales. It's a great example of GM design by committee.
Also I am not against American vehicles since I drive a 2014 Ford Explorer. I am just against a corporation taking my tax money and then refusing to really fix what was wrong with the company in the first place. Are GM vehicles better today then they were 10-20 years ago? Yes, but they are still a follower and not a leader. They are still run by the bean counters and are still in the badge engineering business. I could go on and on, but I'll leave it at that. Enjoy your new Corvette. I am sure it will be a beautiful automobile.
1. You don't know what's in my garage. And I don't give a rip about what's in my neighbor's garage.
2. In 1996, I directly asked a GM rep at a major international auto show why they dropped the DOHC. His answer: "less maintenance issues". I had been a Chevy guy my whole life but then went out and bought my first Bimmer.
3. Yes, as I said, the numbers are impressive, but how much of the power is useable? Yes, I know about traction control, but what's the point if turning it on just neuters your monster V8.
Hey, I never derided the reliability of the GM small block V8 (single cam, 16V, push rods). The engine is legendary. I've owned several, but they never were good for anything but going fast in a straight line. GM just can't innovate beyond it.
So let me get this right.
1. Whatever is actually parked in your garage isnt comparable at all to the ZR-1.. which is why you avoided the question. You dont ever have to answer the question.. but you do know that I am telling the truth. I'm always amazed at people like you are who quick to berate another vehicle, but literally own/drive something much less desirable.
2. "A GM rep at a major auto show". Really?? That is the evidence you have provided that the LT5 is not reliable engine. Even so.. newflash Mr. Engineer: every pushrod V8 has absolutely "less maintenance issues" than any DOHC 32V V8.. because its a much simpler design.
3. The ZR-1 was a freaking top-of-the-line sports car. It was literally called the "King of the Hill". Exactly what about makes you consider the power "useable". Have you ever even drove one.. or is this just more spiel that you have made up? When the ZR-1 was released it was one of the top 5 performance cars in the world. Thats why it was a big deal and thats why people wanted one. Not because the power was "un-useable".
And stop with GM hate. They innovate incredibly well. That have an outstanding line up of gas & diesel, naturally-aspirated/turbo/supercharged, variable valve timing, direct fuel injection, cylinder deactivation lineup of I4/V6/V8 engines that are all class leading in power, weight, reliability & fuel efficiency. Furthermore every GM vehicle sold since 2007 came with a 5year/100,000 mile powertrain warranty.. something you will NEVER see the Germans or Japanese doing.
Go back to driving the Camry or Accord thats actually parked in your garage.. instead of trolling a Corvette Z06 thread.
Speaking of ignorance, have you found any published specs on the Z06 HP/Torque RPM ranges?