A person’s point of view will determine how much that person is prepared to spend on something.
True, but that isn't what we were talking about, we were talking about whether the $350 price point of the speaker is "overpriced" not whether someone is prepared to spend the money on it.
I don't think a 75" 4k OLED TV is over priced at $8,000, but I'm not prepared to pay that much for it because the use and enjoyment I'd get don't justify the price.
I do believe the 2017 MBPs are overpriced for what you get, yet I own one because the use and enjoyment I get provides me more enjoyment than other things I could spend the money on.
There is little correlation between "overpriced", and some specific individual being willing to pay for it.
Prada sells a standard sized paperclip for around $150? Is that overpriced? Some people buy it.
But it a good sounding speaker is a good sounding speaker, and as such will have a value relative to how good it sounds.
How could does that speaker sound when it's playing my TV audio? How about playing sound from my computer? I would argue the HomePod is useless as a speaker, but that's not fair because the reality is it is not a speaker, not marketed as a speaker, and not intended by Apple to be treated as a speaker. It is a lock-in device for other Apple products and services.
IMO, a speaker with the sound quality of the HomePod is good value at $350. The very limited device that the HomePad actually is would be overpriced at $50.
My point is that if the HomePod sounds as good as it reportedly does, then it’s probably worth the money for that alone. All the Siri stuff is just icing on the cake.
My point is that for most of the content I actually wish to play on a speaker, the HomePod sounds exactly as good as a stone I pick up from the ground outside. The HomePod and the stone are equally useful as speakers ***and equally not intended to be speakers***.
I don’t see how you can say it is overpriced, if a comparable sounding speaker would cost just as much, with or without the smart stuff.
Find me a comparable sounding speaker that I cannot connect to my computer or TV and we can discuss it. The HomePod is not a speaker.
I can see them opening things up to HP in time too. They might shift a few more AM subscriptions if they don’t, but they’d likely shift a lot more HomePods if they do.
I know if it sounds as good as indications so far say, I'd buy 1 or 2 at $350 if I could use them as speakers. As the limited ecosystem lock-in device it is, I wouldn't buy it at $50.