It took 13 years to get from Mac OS X 10 to Mac OS X 10.1 (Plus an elementary Math error.) But they go through iOS major builds like crazy. I agree it really should be something worth the new build number at this point because it's been essentially the same since the first revision.
Didn't they at least try to hide those banners in the past?!?
Math wise it is.
10.10 =/= 10.1
10.10 = 10.10.0
Software versioning FTW
But this isn't math. It's version numbering. The periods separate major and minor fields.Math wise it is.
At least that was a real wave. Great colors and contrast.I love this look, just like OS X poster last year.
I did not realise that Apple were lagging in terms of their Polish support...
Apple's iOS 8 is expected to retain the same general look as iOS 7, offering polish along with several new features...
Doubt it. Making something water resistant comes at a cost. Worse sounding speakers and mic and who wants to fish out a rubber plug with their thumbnail every time the want to charge their phone?Given the watery nature of this image [...] Do you think they are finally going to release the iPhone 6 and iOS8 as Apple's 1st equally water resistant phone ?
"10.n" are major builds. The "10" is not really part of the version number, it's much more a brand name. The OS is called "OS X". Actually, it has been explained a thousand times in every single thread that is even remotely connected to that topic.Maybe not, but what do they have against 11? We've been through 7 major iOS builds to date going on the 8th. Point is hopefully its spectacular.