I really don't understand why phone makers don't just increase the thickness of the phones again so that it's one seamless surface... ugh!I think it's safe to say the modules are no longer a 'bump', but a bulge.
I really don't understand why phone makers don't just increase the thickness of the phones again so that it's one seamless surface... ugh!I think it's safe to say the modules are no longer a 'bump', but a bulge.
Timmy Apple is all about the services $$$. To him hardware is just a pipeline to users buying services Apple services.Glacially slow evolution during this Eon of Cook.
So, how do you explain the clunky black block that is the Apple Watch and its selection of extraordinarily restricted and uninspiring clock faces?Yes, I’m sure that’s exactly it, Apple put ‘very little effort into the design’ of the iPhone.
Considering, Apple prides themselves in designs for all of their products, I’m sure they put more than just a ‘little bit of effort into the design’ of the iPhone. Just because it doesn’t appeal to you because of a ‘camera bump’, doesn’t mean it’s a problem for everybody else outside this website where some members are overly pedantic on here.
I’m not sure you want that. That’d be ridiculously thick.I really don't understand why phone makers don't just increase the thickness of the phones again so that it's one seamless surface... ugh!
Yeah agreed. I mean, I will never buy a Mini, but I support to the hilt a variety of product sizes, even if some of them aren't making a single cent of profit. Apple has no heart. I tries to pretend it does, but it's a heart of cold, hard, stone.Not with THIS customer. It's a shame that economies of scale determine product development. The mini might not have sold a bajillion units, but the people who like it REALLY like it. I wish that counted for something.
Because no one would buy a phone that thick or heavy. Seriously, people think they can just magically make it thicker and add some battery while they are at it. If they did that it would weigh twice as much, and the Pro models are already too heavy. No cares about the stupid camera bump. It affects absolutely nothing, unlike doubling the weight and thickness of the device.I really don't understand why phone makers don't just increase the thickness of the phones again so that it's one seamless surface... ugh!
Yes, yes it would. Just take a look at it:I’m not sure you want that. That’d be ridiculously thick.
The iPhone 8 would naturally still be part of Apples line up for iOS updates, but it’s not being sold/available on their site. The point is, it’s not actively being promoted in any shape or form, it’s basically a 4 year old phone that isn’t relevant anymore. I also expect 2023 to be the very last year for iOS updates for the iPhone 8 in the 5-year cycle.the fact that iPhone SE 2 & 3 are keeping iPhone 8 alive.
Where did I say it would taper down to a point at the bottom? All the components that currently fit at the bottom would still be at the bottom. The cameras would be at the top. The top would be just thick enough to encase the cameras. Backfill the additional space with battery. Plenty of people have suggested making the entire phone as thick as the camera bulge and filling the resulting space with batteries. That would be heavier, and something approaching half an inch thick, from end to end. I'm proposing shaving some of that extra thickness off, with a phone that would be lighter than a full block, yet have a flat back that would sit flat on a table.All of the bigger components would have to be shoved towards the top of the phone, several things that are currently at the bottom would have to be moved to the top, it would be an absolute disaster.
I really think apple will try to skin the usb c with the iphone and fry and sell us some wireless only garbageThere's more to it than just charging your phone. It would have faster transfer speeds for those that record a lot of video. (The new ProRes video is great, but is painfully slow to transfer.) Also, finally using a standard cable/plug that nearly every every electronic device uses these days. The iPhone is the oddball out. Everything I have uses USB-C (Nintendo Switch, MacBook, iPad, GoPro, drone, battery bank, active stylus pen, etc).
Honestly, I think the real one looks more ridiculous than the "fat" one below. On first glance I did not even notice that the lower was thicker. I doubt the dimensions would be an issue in practice, but indeed, the weight might.Yes, yes it would. Just take a look at it:
It's almost as thick as a MacBook Pro with the lid closed! No one wants to hold that. Nor does anyone want something that weighs at least twice as much. Most of the weight is in the stainless steel and the battery, and these crazy suggestions just advocated add much more of both.
View attachment 1993478
View attachment 1993494
I would complain because it would be “slightly thicker” but a lot thicker plus heavier and I want a slim and light phone with great cameras. I don’t care about the bumps at all.Would look a lot better with the cameras flush. These bumps are really naff and make it look like very little effort has went into the design. I am sure no one would complain about a slightly thicker phone that has more battery life or better cooling.
Totally hear you. I MISS that excitement, always looked forward to the keynotes. And nothing will ever beat my "WHOA" reaction when I watched in Jan. 2007 - the very first iPhone. Many were mind blown.I've reached full "Meh" with the iPhone design. Every year its just a larger camera now. Its fine, but there is zero exciting about it anymore.
That's what I think. Plus the fact that the 13 mini will be sold for 2 or even more years directly from Apple. Perhaps they will drop a new color, too.Don’t worry mini fan (me included). The mini will reappear as iPhone SE 4th gen and 5th gen just like the fact that iPhone SE 2 & 3 are keeping iPhone 8 alive.