Yah and the iPhone looks similar to the LG KE850 that came out first. What's your point?
LG's Press release dated Jan. 18th, 2007, iPhone introduced Jan. 9th. But still a valid point.
Yah and the iPhone looks similar to the LG KE850 that came out first. What's your point?
WebKit is used by other companies as well, and now adopted by KDE - Konq ( which used KHTML).
I agree. I'm excited about this not because I want to get my hands on an android phone, but rather because I don't want to see Apple get too comfortable with the iPhone in its current state. This news, to me, is more exciting simply because it will be interesting to see what Apple will do to differentiate from the Android platform....and being Apple, you know they'll do it.
(watches "android" videos - snoozes)
Sorry, guys, just like the Wright Brothers and Thomas Edison - if you're not the first, you're just one of many....
Windows Mobile, Prada, HTC Touch - join the iPhone copy crowd....
Yup, I believe Nokia is one of the other (major) companies. But the point is, it's just one more way that Google have leveraged off Apple here. And at what point do all the little bits of leveraging add up to outright copying? I would say they crossed some sort of line when they used a coverflow effect for the web-history. Also having a dock for the main interface is a bit on the nose.
What the heck are you talking about?Ow man, i can see Apple offering a dual boot or something ...
You could easily come up with examples of Apple where they have blatantly copied other products. But, whats the point? All companies copy each other.
You could easily come up with examples of Apple where they have blatantly copied other products. But, whats the point? All companies copy each other.
Agreed.I agree. I'm excited about this not because I want to get my hands on an android phone, but rather because I don't want to see Apple get too comfortable with the iPhone in its current state. This news, to me, is more exciting simply because it will be interesting to see what Apple will do to differentiate from the Android platform....and being Apple, you know they'll do it.
You could easily come up with examples of Apple where they have blatantly copied other products. But, what's the point? All companies copy each other.
Two things..
(1) I wanted to point that you (yes you) can play with this right now. They are calling it an SDK but it is more. It's the whole darn thing right on down the kernel level drivers. The whole system is downloadable from Google and it runs on most computers inside an emulator. You don't need any special phone hardware. So go get it and see for yourself, no need to look at these videos.
(2) For all those who would complain about the way it looks or the way it works. You have ALL of the code and the development system on your computer. You can fix it. No need to wait for "someone to please..." Just do it. OK maaybe most readers lask the technical skills but you could in theory make any change you can think of. And not just writting your own app like Apple will et yu do next year. With Andrios even the core features and the drivers that talk to the chips is all open
Wait, not just anyonecan download the SDK, right? You have to be a developer I thought.
Agreed.
The best news about Android is not about using it at all but the effect it will have on Apple and the Industry as a whole.
This development almost certainly means the death of both Windows Mobile and Palm OS, the two biggest Mobile OS competitors (at least in the smartphone market), prior to the arrival of iPhone.
Palm as a company, will likely be absorbed or die soon anyway, but the death of Windows Mobile is going to cause a lot of ripples if it does indeed occur. Already stalled on the desktop and hardly used in the server space, exiting the mobile space would make Windows almost inconsequential if not for the existing installed base (and that is already dropping as well.)
Don't really see what this has to do with the mac or with rumors, which is odd considering this site is called macrumors.
Yup, I believe Nokia is one of the other (major) companies. But the point is, it's just one more way that Google have leveraged off Apple here. And at what point do all the little bits of leveraging add up to outright copying?
I would be ashamed to show a product that is such a rip-off. From the look-a-like dock to the poorly implemented cover-flow to the square icons, there is a huge lack of creativity. Of course I would not say design is not one of Googles strong suits.
Apples strength is the high level of integration. Open source, which sounds "cool" on the surface really means there will be a hodge-podge of applications without a unified design strategy. Why do you think Linux is not a mainstream OS?