The lack of "Macbook Pro" under the screen still seems odd to me. I understand why they did it, but I guess I'm just not used to it.
Why did they do it?
The lack of "Macbook Pro" under the screen still seems odd to me. I understand why they did it, but I guess I'm just not used to it.
Hey, PRICE WHINERS !
In 1984 for $ 2,400 we had a Mac with:
9 inch black and white screen
NO hard drive
NO Superdrive
NO built in camera
NO Wi-Fi
128!!!!mb memory for the OS
Couldn't even log it around!
If you buy this puppy plus Apple Care for say $ 3,000 with some bells and whistles it will cost you:
$ 1,000 a year
apr. $ 85 a month
apr. $ 2.75 a day
We live with iphone plans of $ 100 a month, so this machine is really expensive?
Huh?
I have a Rev A late 2008 Unibody MacBook Pro, it has been wonderful from day one all the way to today. I have a new Retina 'Book on order, I'm definitely due.....
I'm kinda curious as to how Windows under bootcamp runs on these machines and if it can even take advantage of the retina display properly. Also, am curious about Linux running on these machines.
Personally, I run Windows/Linux under VMWare Fusion, but some of my coworkers choose to run Windows or Linux on their Macs. The last round of purchases, we bought 17" MacBook Pros for all developers, because we figured they could run whatever OS they wanted if they don't like OS X. I'm wondering if we can do the same this time.
Not sure why this got down voted, but thanks for the post. Good info.
----------
Can anyone hook this thing up to an external monitor? How does it handle scaling? Or just somehow magically keeps elements the right size on the external display?
Just got my MacBook Pro Retina (15.4/2.7ghz/16gb/512gb) and installed Photoshop CS6.
The current version of Photoshop's UI is very pixelated as seen in the screenshot. The computer is very responsive as applying filters, etc. is super fast! Can't wait until Adobe updates the UI to accommodate the retina display across the CS6 Suite.
Obviously some need this level of computing power but I doubt that the majority do and it's just a status symbol. It's a beautiful computer but, for $3,000 for a "loaded" one, I hardly believe a casual user needs something like that.
My .02. YMMV.
Just got my MacBook Pro Retina (15.4/2.7ghz/16gb/512gb) and installed Photoshop CS6.
The current version of Photoshop's UI is very pixelated as seen in the screenshot. The computer is very responsive as applying filters, etc. is super fast! Can't wait until Adobe updates the UI to accommodate the retina display across the CS6 Suite.
Likely doable with user hacks.Also can anyone with one confirm if you can run the display in 'normal' 2880 x 1800 pixel mode? Rather than HiDPI 'retina' mode?
Space hog.Why did they do it?
There is no such thing as too much RAM and too much storage.Enough! Seriously you need a reality check! Apple charges like 2-3 times the street price for those upgrades. I'm glad they have 8 GB as standard, because except for hardcore photo designers, CAD developers, composer or other "real" pro users nobody need's more then 8 GB, nor the more powerful i7s nor the bigger SSD drives, when you just manage your files correctly. I mean you can have all your iTunes media on a separate thunderbolt drive for example. I see no reason why any prosumer would need the bigger more expensive models.
I figured that out with just the WWDC slides and took them into account when ordering mine. Then I looked at iFixit.Don't buy the base model thinking you can upgrade later...
Expensive it may be, overpriced it isn't, especially with Mac computer hardware.nice BUT way over priced. for $3k plus laptop.
I framed it as a "should I spend $500 for ~240GB more real storage or $500 for doing things faster even if I don't need the speed now"...Got the 2.6 with 16gb ram and 512gig HD.
Surprised so many people went with the 2.7. Didn't think it was worth $250 for a .1 Ghz bump in processing speed.
2 to 3 Week wait when I ordered it though.
I'll be waiting until next year when they bring out a proper PRO MB so I can upgrade from my 2008 MBP
The lack of "Macbook Pro" under the screen still seems odd to me. I understand why they did it, but I guess I'm just not used to it.
I don't think that any mac or apple product will stack up in inventory not to mention new released awesome mac.
I'd like to see 1st week sales figures I don't think they sold more than few thousands...and what surprise me more that it is a high end expensive model and a lot of people are buying them.
Does the screen really have those pinkish and greenish hues I'm seeing in that photo?
Are you going to ask why the trackpad is really small too since the photo cuts that off or why there is no dock?
I hook mine up to my 30" Cinema display, with the clam shell closed. I have had no problems
Surfing the web...honestly felt about the same. Sure, font was really crisp when I zoomed way, way in but nobody reads articles zoomed way in.
This makes me think of a discussion in a recent episode of Veep, from HBO, involving a character not-so-subtly bashing a professional photographer's choice of camera and bragging about how he owns a more expensive one. The photographer's comeback is perfect but it's onviously lost on the other guy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEwUnENlc9M&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Obviously some need this level of computing power but I doubt that the majority do and it's just a status symbol. It's a beautiful computer but, for $3,000 for a moderately loaded one, I hardly believe anybody really "needs" something like that.
My .02. YMMV.
I hook mine up to my 30" Cinema display, with the clam shell closed. I have had no problems