I can imagine people trying to pronounce this on launch day:
"Yo-se-ta-me, Yo-se-mite, Yose-mite, Yose-ma-tee"
I think OS XI (11) would be better. We've gone through 10 versions of Mac OSX. Now we should go through 10 versions of OS XI. Makes sense to me.
I don't know. But last few days have had a lot of "convergence" and replacing Intel with A8 or A9 in Macs. Both are spun well but then one thinks beyond the spin and it gets scary (IMO). I hope all of "us" who thinks convergence of both into one and/or A8 or A9 replacing Intel in Macs are WRONG.
On the A8/9 in Macs bit, I've even seen some spin about us just using the iOS version of programs until they are updated for Mac-sized screens. Yikes!
I'm not a fan of those landmark names either. It's too California-centric, too USA-centric. And some of these names could be hard to pronounce correctly if you don't speak english. Hopefully they'll stay with single-word names.
AND if this is what we have to look forward to, I'm totally in! http//youtu.be/ZwzY1o_hB5Y
[media=youtube]ZwzY1o_hB5Y[/media]
I knew the pronunciation of 'Yosemite' from the old Warner Brothers cartoons but didn't make an association with the written word 'Yosemite', which I was familiar with from National Graphic (or similar publications) before the B&W G3 was given the codename.Anyone who's been through elementary school in the US should be able to pronounce "Yosemite." Apparently another poster in the UK was familiar with it, too.
Wait, there are going to be new features?!?Other than design / UI changes...
What new features do we think this will have ?
Agreed. But then, i've always enjoyed going to Sequoia more than Yosemite. Yosemite gets all the hype, and all the people. Sequoia is every bit as good or better, imho.
Mac OS X 10.10 Dubstep Apple going for that hipster look maybe a Twerk video at WWDC.
I might be in the minority but I preferred cat names to be honest.
OS X Yosemite!
No, you are NOT the minority.
----------
I believe you got it correct. I know for sure it's not Redwood.
Seriously how many more revisions are we going to get of OS X. Isn't it time to move up to verison 11?
Anyone who's been through elementary school in the US should be able to pronounce "Yosemite." Apparently another poster in the UK was familiar with it, too. Besides, English spelling is mostly arbitrary at this point in time and these "words" don't usually get adapted into other languages without some pronunciation changes, anyway, driven by both orthography and phonotactic constraints.
---
What's so special about ten versions of 10.x or 11.x?
I think it's because we've never seen double digit version yet. So 10.10 looks weird to us. And how the hell are they going to 11? Will Cook kill OS X like Jobs did with 9?
Or are we so perfect with ten (X) or to damaged as Americans to embrace 11?
I think it's because we've never seen double digit version yet. So 10.10 looks weird to us. And how the hell are they going to 11? Will Cook kill OS X like Jobs did with 9?
Or are we so perfect with ten (X) or to damaged as Americans to embrace 11?
----------
And if you want to get symbolic there are two sides to that mountain.
So
10.10
Or
11
AND if this is what we have to look forward to, I'm totally in! http://youtu.be/ZwzY1o_hB5Y
well, Spanish but...
![]()
Could've used Serval, Lynx, Ocelot, Caracal, Bobcat etc but I suppose technically they are small cats.
I preferred the more international and inclusive big cat names as they were more easily understood and people could relate with them a bit more. I don't dislike the new Californian names, though I agree with a poster above that celestial names would've been cool!
I'm not a fan of those landmark names either. It's too California-centric, too USA-centric. And some of these names could be hard to pronounce correctly if you don't speak english. Hopefully they'll stay with single-word names.