Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Does it really matter whet they call it? If it is stable, and serves the needs of the vast majority of the users, they could call it OS X Poop and what does it matter?
 
I can imagine people trying to pronounce this on launch day:

"Yo-se-ta-me, Yo-se-mite, Yose-mite, Yose-ma-tee"

Anyone who's been through elementary school in the US should be able to pronounce "Yosemite." Apparently another poster in the UK was familiar with it, too. Besides, English spelling is mostly arbitrary at this point in time and these "words" don't usually get adapted into other languages without some pronunciation changes, anyway, driven by both orthography and phonotactic constraints.

---

I think OS XI (11) would be better. We've gone through 10 versions of Mac OSX. Now we should go through 10 versions of OS XI. Makes sense to me.

What's so special about ten versions of 10.x or 11.x?
 
I don't know. But last few days have had a lot of "convergence" and replacing Intel with A8 or A9 in Macs. Both are spun well but then one thinks beyond the spin and it gets scary (IMO). I hope all of "us" who thinks convergence of both into one and/or A8 or A9 replacing Intel in Macs are WRONG.

On the A8/9 in Macs bit, I've even seen some spin about us just using the iOS version of programs until they are updated for Mac-sized screens. Yikes!

I think you spun around one too many times before writing this. :confused:
 
Be a citizen of the world but have an identity, roots

I'm not a fan of those landmark names either. It's too California-centric, too USA-centric. And some of these names could be hard to pronounce correctly if you don't speak english. Hopefully they'll stay with single-word names.

I totally disagree. I believe the trend in the world for marketing is to be a citizen of the world but have an identity, have roots. Apple will actually get more respect in say China if it sells itself as being able to answer the question: "Where are you from?"
 
Anyone who's been through elementary school in the US should be able to pronounce "Yosemite." Apparently another poster in the UK was familiar with it, too.
I knew the pronunciation of 'Yosemite' from the old Warner Brothers cartoons but didn't make an association with the written word 'Yosemite', which I was familiar with from National Graphic (or similar publications) before the B&W G3 was given the codename.

Those Loony Tunes cartoons haven't been broadcast in the UK since some time in the 1980s. Too much violence, too much of what is now considered racism, etc etc. I think the word 'Yosemite' will be unfamiliar to the large majority of the UK population under the age of forty.

Not that I care: I've never got into the habit of referring to OS X versions by anything other than number. It was good enough for Apple until 9.2.2...

----------

Other than design / UI changes...

What new features do we think this will have ?
Wait, there are going to be new features?!?
 
Agreed. But then, i've always enjoyed going to Sequoia more than Yosemite. Yosemite gets all the hype, and all the people. Sequoia is every bit as good or better, imho.

Definitley. I love the river that runs through the park too. I swam there once but the water is very cold lol
 
Seriously how many more revisions are we going to get of OS X. Isn't it time to move up to verison 11?

Why change the name just to change it? Unless they rewrite a large portion or completely change the UI it won't be enough to differentiate it as a completely new OS. Plus Steve Jobs said OS X would last 20 or so years. It's nothing surprising.
 
Anyone who's been through elementary school in the US should be able to pronounce "Yosemite." Apparently another poster in the UK was familiar with it, too. Besides, English spelling is mostly arbitrary at this point in time and these "words" don't usually get adapted into other languages without some pronunciation changes, anyway, driven by both orthography and phonotactic constraints.

---



What's so special about ten versions of 10.x or 11.x?

I think it's because we've never seen double digit version yet. So 10.10 looks weird to us. And how the hell are they going to 11? Will Cook kill OS X like Jobs did with 9?

Or are we so perfect with ten (X) or to damaged as Americans to embrace 11?

----------

And if you want to get symbolic there are two sides to that mountain.

So
10.10
Or
11
 
I think it's because we've never seen double digit version yet. So 10.10 looks weird to us. And how the hell are they going to 11? Will Cook kill OS X like Jobs did with 9?

Or are we so perfect with ten (X) or to damaged as Americans to embrace 11?

Why doesn't it follow mathematically again? I keep seeing people say 10.10 is acceptable for a version number but does that not bother the living **** out of everyone else? 10.10 = 10.1

It isn't correct - and it also just shows that they're not ready to do anything major with the platform and are just shoving another point update in.
 
I think it's because we've never seen double digit version yet. So 10.10 looks weird to us. And how the hell are they going to 11? Will Cook kill OS X like Jobs did with 9?

Or are we so perfect with ten (X) or to damaged as Americans to embrace 11?

----------

And if you want to get symbolic there are two sides to that mountain.

So
10.10
Or
11

10.4.11

11.0 would be reserved for a potential transition to the ARM architecture.
 
Could've used Serval, Lynx, Ocelot, Caracal, Bobcat etc but I suppose technically they are small cats.



I preferred the more international and inclusive big cat names as they were more easily understood and people could relate with them a bit more. I don't dislike the new Californian names, though I agree with a poster above that celestial names would've been cool!


Mountain lion is also a small cat. The classification does not really refer to size.
 
Wouldn't mind if it looked something like this, but nothing too crazy.
 

Attachments

  • OSX11-Concept3.jpg
    OSX11-Concept3.jpg
    19.1 KB · Views: 394
I'm not a fan of those landmark names either. It's too California-centric, too USA-centric. And some of these names could be hard to pronounce correctly if you don't speak english. Hopefully they'll stay with single-word names.

Californians may love California, and talking about how they're from California, but the rest of the country generally does not have a positive feeling about California. The rest of the world probably doesn't get the references, or sees California culture as a threat to their own cultures.

They should have gone with, well, anything else. Mavericks is a stupid, confusing name. Yosemite may finally teach people how to pronounce it properly (it's four syllables, FYI), but it's really our worst national park. Beautiful from afar, maybe, but it's a smog-filled valley overcrowded with tourists ignoring the scared and sickly wildlife whose habitats have become parking lots for endless streams of smelly buses. Sequoia would've been a better image to associate with. Well, at least it wasn't Death Valley.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.