Truthfully, I think most people simply won't/don't care about the movie.
(Would be glad to be wrong.)
Fasbender is too laid back to pull of Jobs. He hasn't got that intensity that seems about to explode at any moment.
I have no idea what Sorkin is talking about when he refers to Fassbender's "time has come". He's one of the main characters (Magneto) in a huge franchise, he's been nominated for best supporting actor and been in a film that won best picture. How patronizing.
He's a phenomenal actor but I don't see it at all. Christian Bale would've been a better fit, it's too bad he pulled out.
Why on earth does an actor have to LOOK like their biographical counterpart?
Good acting extends further than the surface.
This is hilarious.. Fassbender looks nothing like Jobs at ALL.
It's laughable how wrong Fassbender looks for the Jobs role. The dude looks more like a young Danny Boyle! is that why he was cast? Can we at least darken his hair a bit? Where was Josh Brolin? This casting is painful, no wonder why SONY dropped it.
Fasbender is too laid back to pull of Jobs. He hasn't got that intensity that seems about to explode at any moment.
Three images leaked, and so far Macrumors society has determined:
A. Movie sucks
B. Casting is completely wrong
C. No one cares about this movie
Amazing how the internet is better at casting/directing Hollywood movies than those in the position to do so. Goooooooooo team!
Depends on how famous they were. No amount of good acting can change the publics perception of how the individual is suppose to look, especially if they have a cult following. Here lies the problem with jobs.
Amazing how the internet is better at casting/directing Hollywood movies than those in the position to do so. Goooooooooo team!
Fasbender is too laid back to pull of Jobs. He hasn't got that intensity that seems about to explode at any moment.
Why on earth does an actor have to LOOK like their biographical counterpart?
Good acting extends further than the surface.