Now that you've said it, the first pic clearly looks like a Homepod Mini cable, wrapping down the inside, around the base, and up the other side.The second photo is 100% the old HomePod mic's. MR, I think someone is pulling your leg.
Now that you've said it, the first pic clearly looks like a Homepod Mini cable, wrapping down the inside, around the base, and up the other side.The second photo is 100% the old HomePod mic's. MR, I think someone is pulling your leg.
Yes! One of the cables can clearly be seem here in a HomePod tear down by iFixit.Now that you've said it, the first pic clearly looks like a Homepod Mini cable, wrapping down the inside, around the base, and up the other side.
The second photo does appear to be a mic array similar to the original HomePod, but missing the metal covers over the mics. The headset is supposed to use voice commands heavily, so it will have a similar mic array. It would make sense it would use the same part if the same Conexant voice capture chip is used.I think you need to stop kidding yourself... there identical
The problem isn't Apple delivering a "half-baked" product. The problem is all of the delusional expectations that a very small percentage of Apple fans have for the product.Does anyone still feel like this is a half-baked new Apple Product we will see in WWDC 2023?
No it's not, it's clearly the same (the below flip side of the "leak" second photo and the iFixit photo). Also I can't see Apple reusing parts from the HomePod a new product... it's like Apple releasing the Apple Watch with the iPod nano screen.The second photo does appear to be a mic array similar to the original HomePod, but missing the metal covers over the mics. The headset is supposed to use voice commands heavily, so it will have a similar mic array. It would make sense it would use the same part if the same Conexant voice capture chip is used.
I hope we get a headset that is no different from Glasses in the future. A lot of the ones I've seen so far are just so bulky, yet if a company can invent something like the Visor from Star Trek or the eye piece and it looks "natural", I might then be convinced. I get this is the cool thing now but what are the practical uses for it?
No one is saying the huge VR goggles are the cool thing now, it is just that the technology is not there yet for the smaller much more lightweight glasses. But maybe Apple will surprise us with something insanely great?![]()
The second photo is 100% the old HomePod mic's. MR, I think someone is pulling your leg.
![]()
Ah the heavy jewelry is the battery. I love Iris Apfel (German for Apple, how appropriate, also Iris as in the coloured part of the eye).
If you remember the 1st leaked rumours, there were two teams working on two separate solutions.Dude. The glasses product is the product, and it's what they set out to develop. But it isn't physically possible, so they created the headset to demo the software, and Cook said "ship it". That's what this is.
Can't think of a worse decision to come out of Apple in his tenure.
But it still begs the question: what developers are going to invest money into a platform that's basically only full of other developers? i.e., little to no actual end users.
You realize the PSVR2 only works if you have $500 PS5 right?I bought a PSVR2 for $500 and it’s brilliant. Apple are going to have to go a long way to make people pay $2500 extra.
In fairness, I doubt Apple's headset will be standalone. You will need an iPhone, iPad or Mac.You realize the PSVR2 only works if you have $500 PS5 right?
Yeees? aaand?. We use spare parts (not at Apple, at not-related product/toy producing company) from older working/prototype models/other related products to kitbash prototypes, and sometimes even final items, being going on forever, everybody does it. Wish they had the time of bottomless monies to create a new unique part for every prototype company I have worked with made.The second photo is 100% the old HomePod mic's. MR, I think someone is pulling your leg.
![]()