Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I know, right? Who would’ve thought Tim Cook was behind the most popular smart watch ever to exist and has grown immensely every year in terms of projected sales, let alone the health features that is leading the future of a device that probably has more potential than the iPhone does. Just mind blowing how that watch ‘that looks like every other watch’ made has shattered records.

True but the proper context is the sales are based on the foundation of possibly the greatest tech product of all time.
 
It’s the same size as the 42, which is the same size of the 44. The bezels just keep getting smaller and the usable screen space keeps getting bigger.
Sorry but this simply isn’t true. The watch is physically bigger. Only by a very small amount, but the mm reference is to the case size and not the screen size.
 
That is because the OP pictures are crappy.
No it’s way out of proportion. The fact that the bands have been backwards compatible after all these generations is nice, but as the cases start to grow and change it’s now starting to look ridiculous.
It’s nice that they have kept them backwards compatible, but not to the point of design fail.
 
No it’s way out of proportion. The fact that the bands have been backwards compatible after all these generations is nice, but as the cases start to grow and change it’s now starting to look ridiculous.
It’s nice that they have kept them backwards compatible, but not to the point of design fail.
No, you are wrong… check the side by side pictures on the Apple website, there are some full frontal ones and the differences are imperceptible. The OP pictures are crap.
 

Attachments

  • FAE0B697-571A-484B-9C0B-165FA8D17A93.jpeg
    FAE0B697-571A-484B-9C0B-165FA8D17A93.jpeg
    123 KB · Views: 66
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.