I like Artisright, but it would have been nice to let us hear the sound of the fans running loudly, rather than just describing it.
I like Artisright, but it would have been nice to let us hear the sound of the fans running loudly, rather than just describing it.
Thanks for the link, as suspected really..
Your post made me chuckle. I can almost cook an egg on the top of my 2018 MiniThanks for the link, as suspected really..
Such a shame, I guess I'll keep my 2018 Mac Mini for another 6 months then, and wait for the next Mac Studio.
Yeah, it's a hot one!Your post made me chuckle. I can almost cook an egg on the top of my 2018 Mini
I know, right? My 2018 base Mini has been doing nothing but sharing a tethered iPhone's internet connection with my router (long story), which means it never sleeps, but that's a nothing task, right? It's warm enough that I feel the heat on the desk surface that is a few inches above the Mini that sits below it on a shelf with lots of airflow.Your post made me chuckle. I can almost cook an egg on the top of my 2018 Mini
Damn. That’s disappointing.Yeah, it's a hot one!
Here's another video from the same youtuber, clarifying that under heavy loud the fans on the M4 Pro version almost start immediately. This is a fine computer for light loud using the base chip, but for anything more demanding - it's probably a good idea to wait for the next Mac Studio, if you enjoy a quiet user experience.
Well I wouldn’t, obviously. As I said: “if I can find a 16/512 spec at a decent price, though the new M4 prices are pretty good value in comparison”.but why would you do that when for only CDN$20 more you can get the m4 with 2 more much faster cpu cores and twice the ram
Funny, I feel self-indulgent replacing my modest 2018 base Mini that I got for $599 from Apple refurb store in 2020, but I'm sentimental about the Mini's, and wanted a new toy that would inspire a workspace overhaul for approaching winter. It has a prominent spot instead of a hidden shelf, and I finally have a use for the spiral cable that came with my Audio Technica headphones.
If I had an M1 that was doing a fine job, I'd probably trade it in, and have the same excuse. 😁
A fan noise comparison of the M4 Mini vs Mini Pro is contained within this review of the base mini:
Hmmm that doesn’t sound as bad as the noise in the Artisright video to me.A fan noise comparison of the M4 Mini vs Mini Pro is contained within this review of the base mini:
I bought a new Mac mini m4 pro yesterday to replace my Mac Studio m1 ultra.I'm considering buying the M4 Pro Mac Mini, but have concerns about the sound level of the fans. My questions are for people who have already tried this model:
1. Are there any times when the fan is not running?
2. If on all the time, what is the slowest speed at which it runs?
2. Does it run when the Mac Mini is asleep?
3. Has anyone checked decibel levels at various fan speeds?
Exactly. Future proofing for me is (finally) ensuring that future me doesn't regret the extra power/storage/features I didn't really need when something more fun/practical to buy/unbox/setup comes along.Don't try to future proof with upgrades to an M4 mini. If you really insist on future proofing then you would be better of waiting for the baseline (binned) M4 Mac Studio.
This is the one and only time I had ordered from Apple and then later cancelled. I have an M1 Studio Max and the Mini M4 Pro is notably faster. As I do photo and some upscaling of video, it would have been a brilliant fit. However, I will wait for the next Studio as my system is reasonable on the photo side and patience still needed on the video side.Thanks for the link, as suspected really..
Such a shame, I guess I'll keep my 2018 Mac Mini for another 6 months then, and wait for the next Mac Studio.
Yes — I think if you’re a heavy creator of content (rendering, video processing / encoding) or a gamer… and especially if you are more averse to added fan sound… then waiting until mid 2025 for the m4 max/ultra studio models make sense. If you’re a casual desktop user with moderate use, data/download throughput, and are keeping the unit close to your ears or in a common living area (as I will, with it attached to my TV)… I think the base m4 is the way to go.This is the one and only time I had ordered from Apple and then later cancelled. I have an M1 Studio Max and the Mini M4 Pro is notably faster. As I do photo and some upscaling of video, it would have been a brilliant fit. However, I will wait for the next Studio as my system is reasonable on the photo side and patience still needed on the video side.
I think for general use, the Mac Mini M4 is an amazing computer.Yes — I think if you’re a heavy creator of content (rendering, video processing / encoding) or a gamer… and especially if you are more averse to added fan sound… then waiting until mid 2025 for the m4 max/ultra studio models make sense. If you’re a casual desktop user with moderate use, data/download throughput, and are keeping the unit close to your ears or in a common living area (as I will, with it attached to my TV)… I think the base m4 is the way to go.
The truth is likely that Apple wanted to sell a bridge machine in the mini m4pro until 6-9 months from now when new Studios will come out. I believe the redesign and thermals of the new Mac mini primarily took into account the more affordable price point to the masses in the m4 and the added fan noise for processing other tasks with the m4pro is something they assumed either people will learn to tolerate, or skip in favor of the newer studios. I don’t believe the chassis redesign was targeted at the m4pro — I think they found a design that would work for it, but it was really geared for the base model which will probably be 70+% of their sales in the mini.
The praise is given by early reviewers who lack in depth of their benchmarks and want clicks just highlighting the footprint side of things. Apple should be given credit for this engineering feat, but other than dramatically reducing the power consumption (which isn’t really possible if you’re taxing the m4pro), there’s no magical way to get around the physics of making a box smaller that’s acting as an internal heater — you either have to pump that heat out at a faster rate (louder / higher rpm fans) , or find clever ways to dissipate it via spreading the heat to the box’s surface for passive cooling; the latter is easier to do if you have a larger box to work with and more surface area / openings for air volume venting. I don’t think the m4pro’s various thermals are likely to be lower than the m2pro when fully taxed which makes the heat issue of a smaller box more complicated.I think for general use, the Mac Mini M4 is an amazing computer.
Admittedly, I prefer the footprint of the last Mini over this one and exploit the extra space within for cooling.
Meanwhile, I will have to wait.. and live vicariously through others that share their experiences here (and on YouTube).
We are in agreement. I believe that the past design of the Mini had all that extra room that would have provided the means to better cooling (and silencing) the M4 Pro when given a serious stress load. However, what is here now is here and I will wait for the upcoming Studio. For me, the Studio is ideal in both function and physical design.The praise is given by early reviewers who lack in depth of their benchmarks and want clicks just highlighting the footprint side of things. Apple should be given credit for this engineering feat, but other than dramatically reducing the power consumption (which isn’t really possible if you’re taxing the m4pro), there’s no magical way to get around the physics of making a box smaller that’s acting as an internal heater — you either have to pump that heat out at a faster rate (louder / higher rpm fans) , or find clever ways to dissipate it via spreading the heat to the box’s surface for passive cooling; the latter is easier to do if you have a larger box to work with and more surface area / openings for air volume venting.
Mostly agree, except with air cooling it is the air mass flow rate (can described in pounds/minute). This can be achieve by either blowing the air faster (higher fan RPM) or using a bigger blower or more fans. That is why the Studio can cool a hotter chip, the Studio uses 2 fans. Also I'm still not convinced the new Mac mini's fan is the same size at the previous mac mini's fan. The diameter of the fan housing is about the same but the fan in the new mac mine seems (to me) to be flatter than the fan in the previous mini.you either have to pump that heat out at a faster rate (louder / higher rpm fans)
Admittedly, I prefer the footprint of the last Mini over this one and exploit the extra space within for cooling.
I do not hear any fan noise exporting in Final Cut Pro (24 watts power usage at wall) but exporting with Adobe Media encoder (60 watts power usage) I do head a slight fan noise.I have question for everyone running Mac Mini M4 (base model NOT pro): using Logic, also under load (several plugins etc) do you hear fan noise?