am i the only one absolutely not interested in this...?
GeT OUT!
			
				Last edited: 
				
		
	
										
										
								
								
											
	
		
			
		
		
	
	
	
		
			
		
		
	
										
									
								am i the only one absolutely not interested in this...?
This shot made me drop a tear... REALLY great trailer, way better than the clip released some months ago.
To all the Ashton haters, watch the butterfly effect.
Sadly, even in this trailer Ashton Kutcher is just not that good of an actor.
He is himself, playing a part. I'm not going to rush out to watch it as soon as it is available because I personally don't like AKs acting.
It's like... AK hasn't grown up or matured in life yet and just comes across as a kid trying to play the part of an adult.
He needs to take a class on method acting, because his facial expressions and his eyes just don't show the emotion of the scene he is in. And his voice... ugh... his voice NEVER changes in any of his movie role.
If I come across this movie on Netflix, and I have absolutely nothing else to do, then I'll probably watch it.
I can't stand it when people say things like "Oh he's not an actor," "He always plays himself so he's not an actor," etc. Well he's definitely an actor. If you suck at your job that doesn't mean you don't do that job, unless you're fired because you suck so bad. Ashton is still acting, so he's an actor.First, I reserve "hate" for something more important than an actor, or an electronic device.
Second, I saw "The Butterfly Effect" and it did nothing to change my mind that Kutcher is not an actor.
Not even close...
I can't stand it when people say things like "Oh he's not an actor," "He always plays himself so he's not an actor," etc. Well he's definitely an actor. If you suck at your job that doesn't mean you don't do that job, unless you're fired because you suck so bad. Ashton is still acting, so he's an actor.
A movie that was nominated for 8 oscars and won 3 is not so-so....
----------
You're talking about the Apple of maybe 2005. Now everyone owns at least one apple product, not just rich kids or hipsters. This is A CORPORATION. THEIR ONLY PURPOSE IS TO MAKE MONEY, deal with it. With your logic, I guess you don't own any electronic at all.
Kind of depends on how you define an actor.
However, taking you point, then I'll say he is an actor...and in my opinion...an extremely, deplorably, pathetically bad actor.
I hope that is a fair assessment since you assert that he is an actor.
It's based on Steve's life, so you are saying he did every cliche in the book during his life.
That's fair, yup.
Sorry, it's a pet peeve of mine, as stupid as it is.
Idk what problems you are having in Europe, but in the U.S things are fine. And yes considering the entire developed world is in Europe + America that would mean everyone uses an Apple product. Don't deny it, just don't. I also don't get where you got the impression that anyone thought steve jobs had the morals of the world at heart. Nobody who knows anything about them would insinuate that. So why you're bringing it up, idk. Also, Steve wasn't an almighty, he can't make sure everything's perfect, not to mention he's not around anymore. Get over it.What makes you think everyone owns at least one apple product, or does "everyone"only applies to US citizens/European...? I'm quite aware of the fact that its only about the money, but if you took some time to read what i actually wrote you might figure out that i'm talking about the way they make Jobs look as if he's the business man with al the moral of the world. Fact is that his company exploits people, tells lies to its customers...etc (good example is the 1 year warranty issue in Europe)
He didn't copy it either.Sorry, I should have said 'copied', rather than 'stole'. I just fear the film will make out that he had an epiphany and invented the mouse or the smartphone or something....
You're kidding right? You can't possibly think that the movie is a mirror image of Steve's life. Can u?