Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'm no lawyer, but it seems to me he has no standing for a suit. Even if he did, why did he wait almost 10 years after the iPhone was launched to file a lawsuit?

Just lost his job and his house in in foreclosure.
[doublepost=1467128765][/doublepost]
Good luck. Apple spent loads of money suing samsung on design and failed. The guy should try suing Blackberry for the keyboard design. Actually, I see nothing similar about the design except for the rectangular shape.
Because Blackberry doesn't have 10 billion dollars.
 
Judge; "Mr. Ross, the only thing I can conclude is that you were in a coma for the last 24 years and therefore were not aware of the tens of thousands of other devices like palm pilots and blackberries that more resemble your 'idea'."
 
Hey buddy, at least file in East Texas.....

So seven years after the iPhone's huge success story, he suddenly remembers that abandoned claim from '92 and thinks, hmm, perhaps I can get something out of this, let's file these technical drawings and let's see if I can round up a couple of Apple-hating jurors to side with me, not much to lose really, right? Until he loses, and has to pay Apple's legal costs, hahahahaha.......
 
Last edited:
Better alert Blackberry and Palm, looks like they're gonna get sued too. Look out Kindles and Fire Tables too.
 
Not sure why you can draw something, never actually make anything and get a patent on it. They should make you display a working prototype to get a patent on anything physical and they should totally abandon issuing patents on software functionality

Not sure about making it as you could have a genius idea that would actually cost millions to produce a prototype. However, there should at least be a requirement to detail how the thing works rather than just draw a picture of, say, a time machine and then try to patent it (although by definition patent battles over time machines are always going to be fraught with unique difficulties)
 
... am I reading this article right? Because it sounds like he filed a patent that was later declared abandoned because he didn't actually pay to process his filing. He also failed to register a copyright on the design so he has no copyright nor patent claim on the designs.

So what is his lawsuit over, exactly? It sounds like he has no legal path toward any infringement claim.

Remember folks, you can sue anyone, for any reason, at any time. What matters is if a judge will throw it out on summary judgement or let it proceed.
 
This is an incredible device!

Finally, someone who realizes the forward button should be on the left and the back button on the right.

And a miniaturized 3.5" diskette drive!?! Now *that* is true innovation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chabig and kdarling
So this guy didn't even get a patent for a design that looks nothing like the iPhone, and is now trying to sue over the non-existing patent?

To be honest, the idea that you can get a patent on an (for the time being) un-executable idea is just stupid and antiquated to me. Maybe I should patent portable fusion reactors so in 50 years I can cash in on the new energy business.
 
I can't wait to see his drawings for the Apple Watch!

But seriously, what does it cost to file a lawsuit? Or is it greedy lawyers who do this pro bono only charging if they win?
 
His claim that this design didn't exist before 1992 is ridiculous. Apple published a video in 1987 showing detailed designs for a similar product, Knowledge Navigator. Maybe he copied Apple. In any case, there is tons of prior art.
 
Prada has a better chance over this fool. Not sure why they never went after Apple.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.