Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Prediction for this thread:

I project 633 votes (to bashes) against Ross, 8 for Ross.

Another thread where it would be an old Apple patent or Apple drawing in which Apple is trying to challenge someone for bringing something they drew or patented to market: 633 votes for Apple, 8 votes for the other entity.

At least, we're consistent around here;)

This guy... Wow. A million threads crushing Apple (selectively ignored) and he jumps into (another) one clearly in Apple's favor where a guy didn't even have a patent.

At least, some people are consistent in their oblivious, titled narratives.

Also, that was one expandable, forward thinking device!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: CB1234
I'll bet hipsters and steampunk cosplayers would pay a pretty penny for exactly that device.
 
This is the problem with the patent system, although it sounds like he doesn't even have a patent. If you have an idea, you should have to build a prototype or manufacture it within in a given amount of time. Saying you have an idea and not executing on it over a certain period of time is just like millions of others who drew a sketch of their idea...
 
Last edited:
Looks more like a Palm Treo.
Really an Apple Newton that started developing in 1987 and released in 1993. Oddly his drawings he drew in 1992 are similar to a device Apple was already doing production runs on.
 
Go after Blackberry since Palm doesn't exist anymore. Why single out Apple? Oh yeah, because Apple.
 
This is the problem with the patent system, although it sounds like he doesn't even have a patent. If you have an idea, you should have to build a prototype or manufacture it within in a given amount of time. Saying you have an idea and not executing on it over a certain period of time is just like millions of others who drew a sketch of their idea...

Not quite the issue here, it seems. According to the 2009 case, Ross filed a patent and a request for a waiver of fees from the Patent Office. In that case he claims he received no response to the request, which is why the patent application lapsed. He sued the U.S. government over that issue and lost. So it seems he has no patent and consequently no intellectual property right to assert.
 
Ideas are a dime a dozen. No patent = GTFO. The only person getting paid is HIS LAWYER.
 
Looks about like that Chinese phone that supposedly looks like an iPhone....I should have patented all my drawings from kindergarten...I would be rich by now!
 
Nostradamus had drawn a similar drawing of a device with glass on the front which you can touch to watch events happening around the world or talk to someone or even magically listen to your favorite music.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.