Since Apple associates itself with the Porsche brand in its advertising, I think I’m spot on, actually.Thanks for today's apples to oranges comparison.
If the camera is better I'll buy. But doesn't look possible.
Cool and all... but, again, NEVER be a first adopter. Mark my words. How do you think those who bought the Apple Vision Pro feel about now?I had the first generation of both iPod and iPhone, and each in its own time was the coolest device I’d ever used.
Being an Apple fanboy ...uhhh, fangramp, I suppose (I WAS boyish then... 😂) ...from 1984, I advise that you be a well-informed and -prepared first adopter with the ability to accept frustration and disappointment. I will never forget my Macintosh 128K that I bought in college which, as a first-adopter, I never regretted paying $1,450.00 in 1984 through Apple's university consortium purchasing program (in today's dollars, arguably equivalent to approximately $4,300.00 today). Back then, though, Apple was far more careful about its first-editions and using its customer base as guinea pigs than they have been over the at least last 25 years. #caveatemptorWell, there's always a risk when being a first-adopter of any product, I suppose.
I think we have to balance the potential usefulness of a product for us, against our willingness to accept imperfections.
Cool and all... but, again, NEVER be a first adopter. Mark my words. How do you think those who bought the Apple Vision Pro feel about now?
Or an iPhone sock for $229!Heck you buy a pair of socks that go your feet for $500.
Brut by the palletI spend that much on aftershave.
I was a first-adopter going back to the original Macintosh 128K in 1984... and I was a first-adopter for numerous products over the years, but I stop a couple decades ago since I was burned more than a few times.
Cool and all... but, again, NEVER be a first adopter. Mark my words. How do you think those who bought the Apple Vision Pro feel about now?
Thats a bit of a narrow way to look at things. People can comment on the price and not buy something even if they can afford to buy it. Its about wanting something first and foremost and being able to justify it to ones self.I feel like people who complain about the price shouldn't be concerned with devices they can't afford.
That's nonsense being insecure and having a lack of imagination/ambition what pocket computers can be used for while people have more advanced use cases for computing devices in such form factors than you do.The same market that buys the VR headset. People with a lot of money to burn and no real use of it.
Your either-or fallacy is grossly naive, and you clearly have superficial use of phones compared to the historical target audience of the iPhone Max.There is almost nobody who wants to carry an iPad mini that folds with them all the time. Either that person is phone/screen addicted or the person likes having the latest and greatest tech toys.
I would do almost anything to avoid getting on a payments treadmill. Choose a lower cost device. Defer device upgrades. If essential to get the device, borrow money over one year.They are already moving to 36-month payment periods... why not 48?
"I want a $2,400 iPhone without Face ID," said absolutely no one ever."I want a $2400 iPhone", said no one, ever.