Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I can understand the concept. I can also understand the concept of having a chip implanted directly in my skull.

That's not the issue here. The issue is where said technology is developed enough to a better (including more reliable and safe) alternative to what we already have.

I very much do NOT believe that, for the general public, inserting chips into people's heads is a fully developed and safe technology. I remains to be seen if an Apple foldable phone will be, in daily use, a better alternative to a tablet that is tablet sized and has to put in a backpack.

Personally, I've need a lot more reassurance and real-world evidence that the screen non a foldable phone is as good as or better than then the screens on a non-foldable Apple device, both in terms of performance and reliability. Until Apple can show that, it's not an argument that can be won or lost.
Yeah having a phone that has the option of turning into a bigger screen is on par with putting a chip into your brain. Great analogy.
 
two iPhone Airs ($999 each) + a little something for Timmy for the hinge = the $2000+ price practically writes itself
Not quite, I suspect one of those airs will just be battery and screen
It certainly will be. Even the Galaxy Fold 7 starts at 2,200€ here now and it's the 7th generation
price doesn't really matter for it's succes.

I agree that price won't be a huge obstacle for gen 1, but imagine if they are somehow able & willing to put this together for something like say.. $1500-$1800.

I'm not saying they can or will do that, but if they did they would eat the other foldables market share for lunch and create a viable "upsell" beyond the Pro Max to further increase revenue and upgrades. If you take the fact that one half will be the Air with essentially just battery and screen (no need for separate cameras, cellular modem, processors, etc.), then sub-$2000 would seem possible -- depending on how much the R&D for the hinge is and whether any additional screens or cameras are needed for the exterior.

Again, I don't think we see this sub-$2000, but the market impact would be huge if we did (and they could still upsell to well north of $2k with memory upgrades -- seeing as how the $1199 base Pro Max can be configured to $1999 now.
 
No, I’m saying that the form factor is not what I want in a phone. I don’t have any desire to carry around a phone that transforms into a small tablet. No need to be so defensive because others don’t like foldables
I’m not defensive—don’t care what others prefer in their devices. I’m pointing out your flawed logic. You state it’s unwieldy but it’s comparable or even smaller than current iPhones when closed. When open it’s smaller than any tablets on the market.
 
I agree that price won't be a huge obstacle for gen 1, but imagine if they are somehow able & willing to put this together for something like say.. $1500-$1800.

I'm not saying they can or will do that, but if they did they would eat the other foldables market share for lunch and create a viable "upsell" beyond the Pro Max to further increase revenue and upgrades. If you take the fact that one half will be the Air with essentially just battery and screen (no need for separate cameras, cellular modem, processors, etc.), then sub-$2000 would seem possible -- depending on how much the R&D for the hinge is and whether any additional screens or cameras are needed for the exterior.

Again, I don't think we see this sub-$2000, but the market impact would be huge if we did (and they could still upsell to well north of $2k with memory upgrades -- seeing as how the $1199 base Pro Max can be configured to $1999 now.

sure, they could do that but when in Apple's history have they ever chosen to compete on price?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Oohara


Next year's rumored foldable iPhone will showcase an ultra-thin design resembling "two titanium iPhone Airs side-by-side," according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman.

Apple-Foldable-Thumb.jpg

Writing in the Q&A section of his latest Power On newsletter, Gurman says Apple's first foldable device will be "super thin and a design achievement," combining Apple's thinnest iPhone form factor with cutting-edge folding technology. However, this engineering feat is still expected to come with a premium price tag of at least $2,000.

Apple launched its ultra-thin new iPhone Air last week. The device is 5.64mm thick and represents the company's thinnest iPhone to date, though it's still shy of the M4 iPad Pro's impressive thinness at 5.3mm.

Gurman says manufacturing the foldable iPhone will involve Foxconn in China, despite recent speculation about potential production in India. The device remains slated for 2026, dropping around Apple's traditional fall launch window, "give or take" hedges the Bloomberg reporter.

Industry analyst Ming-Chi Kuo previously outlined specifications for the foldable iPhone, including a 7.8-inch inner display and 5.5-inch outer screen, with pricing between $2,000 and $2,500. Apple reportedly plans to forgo Face ID in favor of Touch ID integrated into the side button to optimize internal space. The titanium device is expected to include a dual-lens rear camera, with a front-facing camera for both folded and unfolded states.
The foldable iPhone will compete in an increasingly crowded market dominated by Samsung's Galaxy Z series, establishing Apple's late entry into the folding smartphone category after years of the rumored device's development.



Article Link: Foldable iPhone Like 'Two Titanium iPhone Airs' Joined at the Hinge
So basically an iPhone Air x2 lol? My friends and I was just talking about how the Air is just a beta test for the fold body
 
I never stated that I’ve owned them, I said I’ve had extensive experience using them since my sister in law has the Fold 7 and a good friend has the Oppo. When I say unwieldily I’m meaning using it unfolded - I don’t like that experience at all for a phone. (Yes I get that it’s essentially transforming into a tablet but I don’t find it comfortable to use as a phone). The crease really does bother me, it’s not so much seeing it (and those latest devices are much improved over the earlier models), it’s feeling it. I can’t not notice it! I’m not against foldables and as I said in my initial post I’m glad Apple is finally getting into the game for those that want one. It’s just not for me. I’m glad you like that form factor as does my friend (sister in law not so much), but I’ll stick with the candybar form factor for phones.

Edit: on your point re plastic, fair call out, I didn’t realise they were glass as to me they feel like plastic, they don’t feel like glass.
Using someone else's foldable and actually owning one are two different things. But, it is great that you've spent what sounds like a fair amount of time using them, which is more than I can say for most on here. Everyone is different, but for me it is almost impossible to feel the crease on the ZF7 and the Find N5. And yeah, the plastic screen protector is what you are feeling on the inner display. I always remove it from my foldables because I prefer to touch the glass. The unwieldy part is hard for me to understand, but that doesn't mean I am discounting anything you are saying. I've owned every iPhone from the 4 to the 12 PM, and I owned every iPad Mini from the 1st gen to the 5th, and after buying my first foldable (the Z Fold 3), I would never go back to the slab phone and mini tablet combo as separate devices. Also, after owning foldables, I don't understand how people can spend so many hours a day staring at the small screen on a slab phone. Whenever someone asks me to look at something on a slab phone, like a photo, web page, etc. I think to myself "this experience sucks" haha.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tbayrgs
I have already mentioned under iPhone Foldable thread (last week) that iPhone Air is the first test bed for foldable entry by Apple. Not surprising at all.
 
They do, for certain product categories, i.e. Walmart distributes a $599 M1 MacBook Air. That's purely a price-play.

sure, but that's an old, entry level device designed at price sensitive consumers, so hardly an applicable parallel to a brand new, foldable iPhone.

Has Apple ever entered a new product category or niche and underpriced its competition?
 
Using someone else's foldable and actually owning one are two different things. But, it is great that you've spent what sounds like a fair amount of time using them, which is more than I can say for most on here. Everyone is different, but for me it is almost impossible to feel the crease on the ZF7 and the Find N5. And yeah, the plastic screen protector is what you are feeling on the inner display. I always remove it from my foldables because I prefer to touch the glass. The unwieldy part is hard for me to understand, but that doesn't mean I am discounting anything you are saying. I've owned every iPhone from the 4 to the 12 PM, and I owned every iPad Mini from the 1st gen to the 5th, and after buying my first foldable (the Z Fold 3), I would never go back to the slab phone and mini tablet combo as separate devices. Also, after owning foldables, I don't understand how people can spend so many hours a day staring at the small screen on a slab phone. Whenever someone asks me to look at something on a slab phone, like a photo, web page, etc. I think to myself "this experience sucks" haha.
Yeah I’ve used them enough to know they’re not my cup of tea basically. Both lovely devices though and they’ve come a LONG way in just a few years. Both the Fold 7 and Oppo N5 are mind blowing thin when unfolded.

Basically for me, I just find the mini tablet form awkward to use for a phone device for what I use my phone for. Typing in particular. The unfolded/tablet size is too big for a phone and too small for a tablet for me - it’s kind of my no man’s land. So essentially the entire point of the foldable form factor just doesn’t work for me. I use my iPad Pro 12.9” mainly for work as a secondary device (with Magic Keyboard), and a bit for watching movies, but it only travels with me to a clients office or sometimes a cafe for deliberate work use otherwise it’s at the bedside.

Now what would work for me is the Flip form factor, if they can eradicate the crease entirely - I’m just never gonna be sold if there’s even the smallest of crease, which I’m sure one day they’ll solve but until then it just bugs me and I can’t let it go.
 
Yeah I’ve used them enough to know they’re not my cup of tea basically. Both lovely devices though and they’ve come a LONG way in just a few years. Both the Fold 7 and Oppo N5 are mind blowing thin when unfolded.

Basically for me, I just find the mini tablet form awkward to use for a phone device for what I use my phone for. Typing in particular. The unfolded/tablet size is too big for a phone and too small for a tablet for me - it’s kind of my no man’s land. So essentially the entire point of the foldable form factor just doesn’t work for me. I use my iPad Pro 12.9” mainly for work as a secondary device (with Magic Keyboard), and a bit for watching movies, but it only travels with me to a clients office or sometimes a cafe for deliberate work use otherwise it’s at the bedside.

Now what would work for me is the Flip form factor, if they can eradicate the crease entirely - I’m just never gonna be sold if there’s even the smallest of crease, which I’m sure one day they’ll solve but until then it just bugs me and I can’t let it go.
I bought the Z Flip 7 FE as a backup phone. The Flip has come a long way since the Z Flip 4, which I bought as a backup phone and returned in about a week because with basically no outer display it was pointless. The usability of the outer display on the newer Flips make them a perfect backup phone to the Fold for me.
 
I bought the Z Flip 7 FE as a backup phone. The Flip has come a long way since the Z Flip 4, which I bought as a backup phone and returned in about a week because with basically no outer display it was pointless. The usability of the outer display on the newer Flips make them a perfect backup phone to the Fold for me.
The Z Flip would give me some serious Motorola StarTac nostalgia vibes.
 
I think the iPhone Air is an absolutely ridiculous product, especially if you buy the $100 external battery that makes it the same thickness of a regular iPhone. I despise the ever increasing camera bump on iPhones. I don't see myself buying a Droid, but honestly the new Google Pixel 9A is exactly what I wish Apple would make. I just want a "flush" phone that I can set on my desk and use the freaking calculator without it wobbling back and forth. To make something "thin" just to shove all its components into a "bump" where it will thermal throttle, while at the same time making that bump also uneven with an additional bump for the camera, and just removing battery to gain the "thinness" so far that you have to then buy an additional battery so that its usable throughout the day is NOT innovation... I definitely don't want 2 iPhone Airs attached with a hinge for $2,000 or more.
It is simple. Just buy what works for you. I know people who want an Air because they are not on their phone very much every week but when they go out they want something light..... if they are traveling they might want some extra juice vs. plugging in at an airport during travel.

So often I see people say what they don't like about a device... Apple is never going to make a perfect device for everyone... but what they do produce covers most users. It is no wonder as they have one of the most popular products ever.

PS, I do buy a Pixel ever few years just to have something different to use. Plus I like to see what's going on with other OEMs etc. I'm eyeing the Pixel 10 now myself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: surferfb
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.