Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I just cannot fathom.. what problem a folding phone device solves...

It will cost as much as a loaded out MacBook Pro, and for what? So you can watch a video sorta bigger? If you've got iPhone ultra money then you've got iPad money and most assuredly have one, so again what does this phone do that I can't already?
I don't want to deal with multiple devices anymore but want to have the benefits of an iPad mini sometimes. Also you greatly underestimate the cost of a loaded out MBP. šŸ˜‚

😭
 
I just cannot fathom.. what problem a folding phone device solves...

It will cost as much as a loaded out MacBook Pro, and for what? So you can watch a video sorta bigger? If you've got iPhone ultra money then you've got iPad money and most assuredly have one, so again what does this phone do that I can't already?
I'm a little surprised by this answer. The problem it solves is being able to use an iPad mini, fold it in half and stick it in your pocket. And you can make phone calls from it / do everything else you do with your iPhone. That isn't a problem the majority of people have, but it is a problem that a niche subset of power users like me have.
 
I really don't get why some just don't understand the benefits. It's like trying to explain the benefits of a car to someone from 300 years ago; once you use it, you could never go back.
Not taking away from your perceived benefits since at the end of the day, we each do what we think works for us. But understand that the benefits you refer to center around the ability to use more ā€œseriousā€ applications on the go and to some of us, the efficiency of engaging in those tasks in a touch device with a small screen is compromised when compared to using a larger screen, physical keyboard, and mouse, for example. It’s more of a ā€œusing the right tool for the taskā€ mentality. With that mindset, trying to accomplish those tasks in a compromised device is just plain painful.
 
Anyways clearly it's not for me, I predict this will not sell. If it's priced like their VR set it will be dead in the water.
Any yet, the similarly designed Galaxy Fold 8 has been selling like hotcakes. The largest pre-sell release of any Samsung phone in history.

 
Because I get the benefit of a smaller phone and a larger one in a single device along with much better multitasking. I can't exactly fit an iPad in my pocket, can I? Not to mention a foldable iPhone will match/exceed an iPad Mini and still weigh a hell of a lot less.

Not everything is about watching a basic video on a larger screen; it's about running apps designed for an iPad or even the Mac on the go. Being able to do the equivalent of full video/photo editing like you can do now with the more professional apps on a Mac with a device that fits in your pocket is really nice. But now you can just quickly fold the screen and put it in your pocket and treat it like any other regular slab phone.

Ignoring the creases, it's the ability to have this in my pocket.


I really don't get why some just don't understand the benefits. It's like trying to explain the benefits of a car to someone from 300 years ago; once you use it, you could never go back.
Agree with you mostly. In practice, using a big touch screen for "laptop class" applications is a little uncomfortable some of the time. Web browsing is probably the biggest win for these folds, and that includes work-oriented web browsing and use of web apps.

As a past Z Fold 2, 4, and currently 5 owner, I've recently come to the conclusion that these Folds won't replace the workflow efficiencies afforded by a full-size hardware keyboard and super-quick drag and drop file management. However, I would argue that these Folds can replace an iPad, or certainly an iPad mini. That's still a win in my book.

The tri-fold also seems cool, possibly a little burdensome for the day-to-day smartphone use aspect. However I totally agree with you about how transformative these fold devices are, at least for power users.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SteveJUAE and Mr_Ed
Any yet, the similarly designed Galaxy Fold 8 has been selling like hotcakes. The largest pre-sell release of any Samsung phone in history.

And in two years, you'll be able to find this wobbly, bouncy Fold at every gum machine for a fraction of the price.
 
Anyone else think it's a mistake that Apple didn't wait / figure out how to get the best possible cameras into this "Ultra" iPhone?
I don't know why they didn't do it (cost, technical, ?), but Samsung did exactly the same thing, so it must be more than choice. And if it would have delayed the phone another year to do so, no, I don't think waiting would have been wise. I've been waiting for a folding iPhone for years. Time for them to get in the game.
 
Video is probably the worst example, since due to aspect ratio, it won't be much larger.
@LionTeeth 16:9 video will still be significantly larger (blue) than on a Pro Max (green):

1786287545332.png
 
I didn’t think I could want the Ultra more until I saw this beautiful dark blue.

Only about a month to go, haha!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: miq
@LionTeeth 16:9 video will still be significantly larger (blue) than on a Pro Max (green):

View attachment 2651312

I think that image is a great example.

Is the display bigger? Yes.

Is it so much bigger that it justifies developing some contraption flip-flap that costs twice as much as the Pro Max? No.

The display is a little bigger. Not two or three times bigger.

Foldables are a gimmick. You can get almost the same effect by simply rotating the Pro Max between landscape and portrait.
 
Anyone else think it's a mistake that Apple didn't wait / figure out how to get the best possible cameras into this "Ultra" iPhone?
I think it's by design to make you consider an upgrade a year or two down the road.

I think the fold 8 looks great and like the form factor. I will most likely be upgrading to the 18 PM for the cameras and wait and see what gen 2 or 3 brings for the apple fold camera wise.

I only use my 14 PM and my M1 MBP. A fold replacing my traditional slab phone could make sense a few years from now but again well see what it offers.

I also considered a new hobby of photography and just getting a dedicated camera.
 
I don't know why they didn't do it (cost, technical, ?), but Samsung did exactly the same thing, so it must be more than choice. And if it would have delayed the phone another year to do so, no, I don't think waiting would have been wise. I've been waiting for a folding iPhone for years. Time for them to get in the game.
Yeah good point. I actually agree with you that it doesn't need the best cameras today versus waiting another year... my thought process is that for a non-Foldable literate audience, isn't the super obvious weak point of this thing going to be the lack of flagship cameras? If Apple is trying to capture a meaningful segment of the mainstream, it seems like an obvious dealbreker / making it easy to talk yourself out of purchasing by going this route. If Apple only cared about the Fold-specific demographic, then they can afford to do this. If Apple wants to ship 10 million units and convince otherwise-Pro buyers to get the best, I question the efficacy of this omission. But I don't know what Apple's strategy is here and clearly they thought a lot about it. For me I'm leaning toward gen 2 or possibly a half-price used one down the line. My pristine Z Fold 5 I just bought for $388 is serving me extremely well as a second wifi-only device.
 
I think that image is a great example.

Is the display bigger? Yes.

Is it so much bigger that it justifies developing some contraption flip-flap that costs twice as much as the Pro Max? No.

The display is a little bigger. Not two or three times bigger.
The size difference is 90% of the size difference between the iPhone mini and the Pro Max, so I’d say it’s more than ā€œa littleā€.

Maybe this picture is more illustrative:

1786290808547.jpeg


Whether it’s ā€œworth itā€ is subjective. But these devices sell for a reason.
 
I don't know why they didn't do it (cost, technical, ?), but Samsung did exactly the same thing, so it must be more than choice. And if it would have delayed the phone another year to do so, no, I don't think waiting would have been wise. I've been waiting for a folding iPhone for years. Time for them to get in the game.
Re Samsung's strategy, it's likely because Samsung is heavily invested in the square-ish Fold (now Ultra) form factor they pioneered, so ditching it entirely for the new unproven passport-style isn't viable. The old design (Z Fold 8 Ultra) benefits from having differentiating features from the plain 8, otherwise it creates product-parity confusion. Z Fold 8 Ultra has also already had triple cameras for years, so keeping them off of the passport-style 8 helps position the 8 one step closer to the Z Flip and away from the Z Fold 8 Ultra.
 
The size difference is 90% of the size difference between the iPhone mini and the Pro Max, so I’d say it’s more than ā€œa littleā€.

Maybe this picture is more illustrative:

View attachment 2651328

Whether it’s ā€œworth itā€ is subjective. But these devices sell for a reason.
Agreed that video content isn't the best reason to get the Fold over the Pro Max. The Folds benefit on video size at the margins, but the real gains come from web browsing, using web apps, spreadsheets, PDF editing etc.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.