con2apple
macrumors 6502a
Or six yearsYea, might be V3 for some of those but personally I can wait, my 17PM will last another 3-4 years
Or six yearsYea, might be V3 for some of those but personally I can wait, my 17PM will last another 3-4 years
China, Hong kong I think they do not have esim and Iphones are dual physical nano sims thereokay who actually miss a physical SIM card slot
They can't put FaceID in because they'd need an array on the inside too, otherwise you'd be forever opening and closing the phone to authenticate things.I still think Apple should wait until it has triple cameras and Face ID to release it. The average person wasn’t expecting a foldable iPhone possibly ever, let alone this fall. So waiting until it lives up to the “Ultra” name would help it fend off inevitable criticism. If the average person can figure out what they don’t like about it in 5 seconds (outside of a foldable just not being for them), then those are features that should have been added.
This assumes Apple does call it the Ultra. Otherwise who cares, it isn’t Ultra. Ultra is supposed to be above the Pro in every way… don’t confuse people with obvious misses compared with the “lower” Pro.
You could have just said, "I can't afford this device."Let’s look at the iPhone Fold for a moment as if it were two separate devices.
As an iPhone
As an iPad
- Thicker and heavier than a traditional iPhone
- Narrower and more awkward outer display
- Less comfortable to use one-handed
- Bulkier in your pocket
- Possible compromises in battery capacity
- Potential compromises in camera hardware
- More limited internal space due to the folding mechanism
- Potentially worse thermal performance
- Less rigid and solid than a traditional slab phone
- More expensive to repair
General Compromises
- Much smaller display than a traditional iPad and even iPad mini
- Less ideal aspect ratio for productivity
- Potentially less comfortable for long reading sessions
- Less suitable for watching movies and other video content
- Limited space for multitasking
- Smaller keyboard and typing experience
- Less practical for creative work
- Does not support Apple Pencil
- Smaller battery than a traditional iPad
- The crease is visible and noticeable while using the display
- The folding design may make it less stable when used on a desk or lap
These compromises essentially mean having a worse iPhone and a worse iPad and it will cost $2,500.
- A more fragile and complex structure
- A folding mechanism that can wear out over time
- Greater risk of damage from drops
- A more vulnerable display
- More expensive repairs
- More moving parts that can potentially fail
- Possible dust and debris issues around the hinge
- Water resistance may be more difficult to achieve
- Higher manufacturing complexity
- A significantly higher price
- Potentially shorter long-term durability compared to traditional devices
This is ultimately the key question with the iPhone Fold: Does the convenience of having both form factors in a single device outweigh all the compromises required to make that possible?
You could have just said, "I can't afford this device."
Tim and John Apple: “This is my design.”In Apples brilliance, they have created a desire for this product in me that will cause me to purchase it at launch. Further, I will probably buy the inevitable overpriced case, I assume more that costs well in excess $300 (think Mac Pro wheels). They did this to me, this is their brilliance.
I’m simply curious: What are you using it for that makes this a deal-breaker? For me i’t just a fast access to calculator.The lack of an action button is a dealbreaker by itself for me. I don't see why the "best" iPhone that costs $2k+ can't have it.
Yes, having options for people with other tastes and opinions than one self makes the world such a complicated place.Most ugly iphone ever. The whole device should be missing next keynote.
I’ve said this of every foldableSo a worse iPhone and a worse iPad, both in one. Lots of compromises on an ultra expensive device. Toaster-fridge.
Like law enforcement, they can force you to unlock your phone with Touch ID but not Face IDI would think Touch ID appeals to a certain demographic. Think the missing features, if true, will show up in v2.
Made me laugh, ironically, as I don't have to care about that any more.… until winter and gloves.