Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
They can't put FaceID in because they'd need an array on the inside too, otherwise you'd be forever opening and closing the phone to authenticate things.

TouchID is a conscious design choice, not a concession.
Include it on both. Is this an Ultra iPhone that costs over $2000 or not? Concession.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TVreporter
This camera bump/plateau/island is really becoming a joke, will we ever see a flat phone again?
Possible in a uber-Pro variant with crazy battery. But the Pro already has such good battery life with the camera bumps that filling the camera-bump space with battery is too niche I’m afraid. But it’s not like I was complaining.
 
Never buy a first gen Apple product. Heck, given that the 2nd gen is already probably nearly set and has zero consumer feedback, skip the second gen, too (if you can and if money is tight).
The second gen might take more than a year, like the Air, and given the 20th anniversary iPhone next year.
 
I'm confused about the mmWave thing. I'm in the US, so that means the mobile internet is going to be slow on the Ultra? If so then the name is VERY unfitting as there is little "ultra" about it opposed to the pro. They better just name it iPhone Duo.
 
Never buy a first gen Apple product. Heck, given that the 2nd gen is already probably nearly set and has zero consumer feedback, skip the second gen, too (if you can and if money is tight).
well, I got first gen AW Ultra - phantastic
1st gen Mac Studio M1Max - phantastic
1st gen MBA M1 - phantastic
1st gen AirPods - great
so, whatever works for you ...
 
What about the camera control button?
The dummies do have it:

1788630509426.jpeg
 
They can't put FaceID in because they'd need an array on the inside too, otherwise you'd be forever opening and closing the phone to authenticate things.
The Face ID assembly doesn’t cost much ($10-15), so the only reason not to include two of them is the battery space it would take up and (probably the more important reason) the device thickness.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zwhaler
The Face ID assembly doesn’t cost much ($10-15), so the only reason not to include two of them is the battery space it would take up and (probably the more important reason) the device thickness.

Yeah, I think the biggest problem is having it on the outside screen when there’s a screen on both sides while they (hopefully) want to keep the thickness below 5 mm when unfolded.
 
  • Like
Reactions: klasma
The ALL NEW iPhone Ultra isn't missing anything. It will be the BEST, MOST INCREDIBLE iPhone that Apple has ever released. This will re-define the best-in-class iPhone offerings, taking things to a whole new level with a two-screen design, in a breathtaking form factor that features a game-changing "no crease" design. As is required, certain features cannot be included in a device, because that prevents a clear upgrade path, which is a big "no-no." Stay tuned!
 
Anyone else wondering what the point is for a camera on the interior, unfolded screen if there isn’t FaceID?
FaceTime, or video conferencing in general.

The Face ID TrueDepth camera is a different thing from the selfie front camera, so there is little connection between the two.
 
The Apple way - sell you the very bare minimum at a super premium price only to slowly release (should be there features) in later versions.

So they keep billions in Tariffs, instead of discounting the hardware to make up for that they on top of that increase prices by up to $300 across product lines.

Apple sucks for this. Total slap in the face for consumers.
 
Digital zoom does not equal optical zoom.
Not having a tele camera is a deal breaker for a lot of people, including me
Good for you, more chance for me to get mine. As blind as I am I don't like to zoom in too much when I'm far away. As too zoomed in it's never as good as having the main camera. But from what I've seen it's not as bad as folks think it is.

Here's examples and I also believe that Apple's camera will be better than the Fold 8 as the Fold 8 Ultra has better cameras.


 
I'm confused about the mmWave thing. I'm in the US, so that means the mobile internet is going to be slow on the Ultra? If so then the name is VERY unfitting as there is little "ultra" about it opposed to the pro. They better just name it iPhone Duo.
mmWave is short range (hundreds of feet from a tower, not miles), low penetration (glass, concrete, foliage can block it, and rain can interfere with it), and costs more (many, many more towers required). It is very very fast when it works, but regular 5G is also fast.

Unless you’re in a city (and not all the time even in those) where a provider has built out the towers for it, you’re probably getting “only” 5G now. Rural areas will probably never have mmWave at all because of the costs.
 
Include it on both. Is this an Ultra iPhone that costs over $2000 or not? Concession.
The amount of screen and chassis space that would take up would be hilarious.

It could be argued that TouchID is actually superior. FaceID unlocks your phone whether you want it to or not. You have no control over this process without turning it off.

Unlocking with a fingerprint is a conscious decision on the part of the user and provides a necessary barrier of entry. It's also how the majority of phone users do so.
 
Like law enforcement, they can force you to unlock your phone with Touch ID but not Face ID
Not exactly true; it depends on your jurisdiction but ultimately biometrics are grouped together and treated differently than passcode entry, which is generally protected under the US Fifth Amendment
 
  • Like
Reactions: k1121j
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.