Yes as there is no Face ID option for Macs...if there was they would use Face ID and drop Touch ID where it would stay on the MacBook AirApple's flagship computer (the MacBook Pro) uses Touch ID.
Yes as there is no Face ID option for Macs...if there was they would use Face ID and drop Touch ID where it would stay on the MacBook AirApple's flagship computer (the MacBook Pro) uses Touch ID.
- Samsung uses a fingerprint sensor on the Z Fold 7.Why would you have to choose? Surely Apple would implement some logic here. If the phone is folded, use the front one. If it's open, use the inside one. Very unlikely you're going to be looking at the front/back of the foldable when it's open; and obviously the inside camera can't see you when it's folded. This is how it works with the Samsung Fold.
Samsung Z Fold 7 also has Face Unlock. I agree the technology isn't equivalent to Face ID, but it's the same concept in terms of determining which camera to use.- Samsung uses a fingerprint sensor on the Z Fold 7.
- Samsung has never had technology equivalent to Face ID.
My iPhone and iPad unlock when my face isn't "aligned". It does not need to be perfectly centered in front of you. I don't think this will be an issue.- Depending on whether you unfold your phone to the left or to the right, the camera will not necessarily be aligned with your face.
Touch ID is only a hassle when your finger is otherwise takenBecause Face ID is the better technology, and is one of the things that makes an iPhone unique. Fingerprint is a hassle to use
Luckily, no one is forcing you to buy one.I still don't want a foldable iPhone.
Good luck when you want to take a quick look inside your phone, but the screen with the TrueDepth camera will be at a 90° angle.My iPhone and iPad unlock when my face isn't "aligned". It does not need to be perfectly centered in front of you. I don't think this will be an issue.
Apple postpones foldable iPhone after Chinese analyst Ming-Chi Kuo reports that @NoIdentitties doesn’t want oneI still don't want a foldable iPhone.
Whether I remove it from my pocket, or pick it up from the table next to me, my locked iPhone's camera is never aligned with my face until I align it.- Depending on whether you unfold your phone to the left or to the right, the camera will not necessarily be aligned with your face.
It won’t unlock when it’s upside down, but Face ID works when the phone is in landscape either wayGood luck when you want to take a quick look inside your phone, but the screen with the TrueDepth camera will be at a 90° angle.
If my 15 Pro is upside-down with its top at the center of a clock, it will unlock with the bottom pointed starting at 2 all the way to 10 so I'm not sure what you're implying. Rotated 90 deg in landscape poses zero issues with Face ID unlocking.Good luck when you want to take a quick look inside your phone, but the screen with the TrueDepth camera will be at a 90° angle.
only thing a foldable will be compromised with is cameras by having 2 instead of 3. overall it will offer a better overall experience than a slab phone. will certainly be able to do more. cameras will be better on the pro devices for sure but i wouldn't say iphone cameras are anything that great anyway though in fairness.The Air isn't bottom of the barrel either.
And anyway TouchID is reliable.
A foldable is a very compromised phone as it..they don't need to add a slowish under screen fingerprint reader or hidden FaceID with ****** front camera on top of it.
iphones are well known for being behind on specs. chinese phones will always be ahead in the spec game but people buy iphones for IOS and it's ecosystemAlready poor specs compared to current foldable. Off course: apple is coming to the party 7 years later with a 1grn device lacking expertise in features and hardware.
And expensive as if truly “modern”, but it is truly behind in all specs already.
touch ID isn't worse just different. face ID is awful when on a desk or side of the sofa. shouldn't need to pick up your phone to check thingsThis is how bored people are. They wish for something worse than the complete effortless Face ID just because it’s different. Dopamine addiction is a real problem.
That’s something I don't get about the Touch ID proponents: what use case do you have for needing to check something on your phone, but not look at the screen? Are you reading notifications without actually looking at the screen? If I'm checking something on my phone that requires it to be unlocked, then I am always going to be looking at it within the range of Face ID being able to unlock it. If it's laying on a desk and I just want to play/pause/skip, then I can do that without unlocking the phone, but if I want to look at a notification, then I'm going to be looking at the screen at an angle where Face ID will work anyway.touch ID isn't worse just different. face ID is awful when on a desk or side of the sofa. shouldn't need to pick up your phone to check things
it's funny when we had touch ID it was the best thing ever and when it was removed people hated the thought of face ID but now it's the only option suddenly it's amazing and fingerprint scanners aren't when in reailty current FPS are great
That’s something I don't get about the Touch ID proponents: what use case do you have for needing to check something on your phone, but not look at the screen? Are you reading notifications without actually looking at the screen? If I'm checking something on my phone that requires it to be unlocked, then I am always going to be looking at it within the range of Face ID being able to unlock it. If it's laying on a desk and I just want to play/pause/skip, then I can do that without unlocking the phone, but if I want to look at a notification, then I'm going to be looking at the screen at an angle where Face ID will work anyway.
As a motorcyclist I will say that Touch ID is more convenient. I can check a message or whatever without needing to remove my helmet; taking off one glove is a lot quicker. Of course unlock with apple watch also accomplishes this, but it does nothing to help with unlocking a phone with is laying on the desk next to me.That’s something I don't get about the Touch ID proponents: what use case do you have for needing to check something on your phone, but not look at the screen? Are you reading notifications without actually looking at the screen? If I'm checking something on my phone that requires it to be unlocked, then I am always going to be looking at it within the range of Face ID being able to unlock it. If it's laying on a desk and I just want to play/pause/skip, then I can do that without unlocking the phone, but if I want to look at a notification, then I'm going to be looking at the screen at an angle where Face ID will work anyway.
That’s the usual misconception: the CEO’s primary job is not to increase shareholders’ value. It can be one of the main objectives and it can have more importance depending on the type and structure of the company. There are many more topics that can have a higher priority. On that note this is also not a legal duty, another common misconception.Shareholder interest and selling the maximum amount of phones to happy customers are perfectly aligned.
Shareholders own the company, so they should have management’s attention. Management works for them. The CEO’s primary job is increasing shareholder value and this system has worked pretty well for getting the best products and services to market.
Markets set pricing, not Apple. This is a big step for most people, but Apple can’t just charge whatever they want. Consumers ultimately dictate what they will pay for most products and services.
I should have gone with your spelling on the nicknameApple postpones foldable iPhone after Chinese analyst Ming-Chi Kuo reports that @NoIdentitties doesn’t want one