-BigMac-
macrumors 68030
That’s a fair use case in theory, but a foldable is a very expensive way to solve it. You’re trading thickness, weight, a hinge, a crease, worse durability, and battery compromises just to simulate ‘small when closed.’ A genuinely small phone with a modern edge to edge display would be the cleaner engineering solution.That is a good request.
But there are also people who want a physically small sized phone.
A size where any of the current iPhone models would be considered oversized. Where even the iPhone mini would be considered too large.
They basically want a phone the size of a small wallet - but still with a decent sized screen. Not an Apple Watch sized screen.
This can be done with a foldable device. Imagine a regular iPhone 17 - that folds in half.
If one would want a large screen Internet communication device - there are iPads for that! An iPhone that folds into an iPad mini is not really adding anything new to the Apple lineup.
Yet if one would want a truly small sized phone - there is currently nothing from Apple.
Foldables don’t magically create space -they rearrange it and add failure points. If Apple can make a phone the size of a small wallet without a hinge, thats objectively the better design. The fact that Apple doesn’t currently offer it is a lineup choice, not a technical necessity.