Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
All this talk has me so pumped for this book! I decided to gt hard copy instead of on my iPad. I think this is worth me getting a hard copy.
 
Steve don't worry. . . We'll destroy Android for you ;)

Not that Apple has to try though. Competition is good and so is choice. I choose Apple. (I know it's extremely early but just imagine what iOS 6 will bring.) Don't stone me!

Can't wait for the book next week.

iOS 6 will erase Android's last stand out feature over iOS... Built in GPS!

One of the big features of iOS 6 will be the maps Apple has been working on for over a year. Virtual 3D rendered on the fly and AR with Siri integration GPS maps! AWESOME :cool:

You heard it here first. Mark my words, my track record is over 90% accurate!
 
Without a doubt he'd be alive today? Unbelievable. Do you know ANYTHING about cancer? You're ****ing insane.

Yes my father Died of cancer a few years ago.

Unfortunately, unlike Steve Jobs, my father did not find out about it until it was too late.
My father took the treatment as soon as it was offered to him, but by that time it had been inside him for almost a year and he died 5 months after the 1st diagnosis.

Steve jobs apparently thought about it for almost a year, and my dad did not even have a year. If you have Cancer you don't wait and think about it. You get it dealt with asap, and being Steve be could of afforded the very best treatment anywhere in the world.

So, yes, in all probability, Steve would still be alive today.
 
Gaining more market share would be easy.

Sell the iPhone for 400 bucks w/o contract. They would no longer have cross margin of 40% but the market share would increase dramatically.
Build an iPhone with a larger screen as an alternative to the current size.
Do something about transferring stuff between phones.
 
Android is one of the most poorly executed "ideas" in the history of technology. Rubbish.
Utter nonsense. I'm a huge Apple fan, I've used their kit since the early 80s and have a house full of the stuff. But when it comes to phones, I just like Android better than iOS. Even my wife prefers it... She's the least technical person imaginable, but having tried the iPhone as well, she bought an Android phone before I'd even touched a real one.
 
Sorry, but it seemed, like many great men in history Steve was Steve's own downfall in the end, his personal obsession and reluctance to do certain things, in his products and even with his own life than was his destruction.

I guess it's a mental issue with people who become more powerful/successful in their field. Be that making a phone or running a country. They become obsessed and can't ever accept anything other than their point of view is the right one.

The end result is always the same. They lose.

Kudos for an excellent post.

I remember Steve Jobs before the turning point in his work / life. Working within the industry with many who were close enough to him to know what was happening week to week, he was not as obsessed with other companies, but solely focused on excellence at Apple. If not for those years he would not have had the luxury of mountains of cash & the time to engineer these law suits.

It really is a shame he let it all go to his head, only to turn negative, vindictive, and even quite possibly desperate in the end. Surely the negative energy he clung to didn't help his health.

It's a new day today, and Apple without Steve is an unknown quantity. As much as I respect Tim, Apple IS Steve Jobs. Never before did one company rely so much on one person. Where Apple goes from here, no matter the roadmap & plans left behind, is the true mystery.

Certainly Apple can operate on auto pilot, the question is for how long?

Yes they will survive & prosper, but in what form?
 
So, which idea did Steve refer to that Google stole it to make Android?
If i am not wrong, Steve is referring to web API which allows custom apps to access data off internet. Steve was talking to Walt in D8 2007 about how Apple engineers were working with Google on the map apps, which until then, Google maps was only on the browser. Steve said Apple built a custom app that feeds data off Google map database via API and realize that they could do so much more than what Google could achieve using the same set of data, via browser. That' what the iPhone and all the Smartphones are working with now... web data feeding custom built mobile apps via API. Before that, you need data from the internet, you launch the browser, and go to a URL to get that data. That's what Google is anyway - Internet Seach company that relies on the browser for all their apps. ... even their Chromebook. Except Android, where it's copying what Apple does ... building custom app that access web data via APIs.

You're not really saying that accessing internet data via API's from a desktop app was done first with the iPhone, no?
 
Ah yes, the notification bar. Just like the Winbots have Alt-Tab, the Fandroids can cling to the notification bar as a singular shining beacon of originality floating in a sea of replication.

:rolleyes:
Like MacOS just replicated an entire desktop from Xerox, you mean...?

If we're talking 'things in Android that iOS really ought to have', home screen widgets would be up there for me. Invaluable feature.
 
Earlier today, Microsoft and Samsung disclosed that they reached a cross-licensing agreement over patents. The key point: it’s a bad blow to the notion that Android is free. Instead, it’s more like “free” with huge Android OEM partners like HTC and now Samsung agreeing to pay Microsoft to use Android. Google must be pissed off.

http://techcrunch.com/2011/09/28/microsoft-samsung-extortion-google/

It's published fact that Microsoft make more money out of Android than they do out of WP7.

So why would they destroy it?!
 
Apples biggest problem is its price. When people see that they can get an android phone for us$ 199, why should they pay 699 for an iPhone or a super expensive month rate (like here in Europe)?

I fear that android is the new microsoft. They will get 90% of the market, and apple 10. I don't like this idea, but it is just logical. And besides that:

- why does apple not make an iPhone with a slightly larger screen!?
- why does apple not make an iPhone nano with a reduced nano (previous gen) design in 4 colors? (silver, black, red, blue)
- and finally: why not making an iPod touch XL with a 6 or 7 inch display!?
 
Earlier today, Microsoft and Samsung disclosed that they reached a cross-licensing agreement over patents. The key point: it’s a bad blow to the notion that Android is free. Instead, it’s more like “free” with huge Android OEM partners like HTC and now Samsung agreeing to pay Microsoft to use Android. Google must be pissed off.

http://techcrunch.com/2011/09/28/microsoft-samsung-extortion-google/

I would have preferred that Apple also come to an agreement with Samsung and HTC.
 
I didn't knew Android was destroyed, can you guide me to news about that?

Has the market share dropped to 1%?

Do you understand that to destroy something you are not required to delete every record of it from world wide web or to buy it out or to bancrupt - you can on the other hand destroy it by creating a superior product which is what Apple does.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Do you understand that to destroy something you are not required to delete every record of it from world wide web or to buy it out or to bancrupt - you can on the other hand destroy it by creating a superior product which is what Apple does.

destroy [dih-stroi]  
Origin
de·stroy   [dih-stroi] Show IPA
verb (used with object)
1.to reduce (an object) to useless fragments, a useless form, or remains, as by rending, burning, or dissolving; injure beyond repair or renewal; demolish; ruin; annihilate.
2.to put an end to; extinguish.
3.to kill; slay.
4.to render ineffective or useless; nullify; neutralize; invalidate.
5.to defeat completely.
verb (used without object)
6.to engage in destruction.

Congrats, Apple may have a superior product by this fact hasn't destroyed anything.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
- why does apple not make an iPhone with a slightly larger screen!?

Because it's useless effort.
- why does apple not make an iPhone nano with a reduced nano (previous gen) design in 4 colors? (silver, black, red, blue)
because Apple can.
- and finally: why not making an iPod touch XL with a 6 or 7 inch display!?

Because it's DOA. We have ipad, hello.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Because it's useless effort.

because Apple can.


Because it's DOA. We have ipad, hello.

----------



Dictionary attack? Seriously? :D

I think he's suggesting why not release a product with a lower price point, to compete with the Android Fire and the smaller Galaxy Tab?

It would make good business sense.
 
Yes. On mobile devices.

Ah, so all those mobile programs that accesed data from internet servers were using the browser.

Ah, so Nokia with their Ovi Maps now called Nokia Maps were using a web browser.

Yap, you were joking

----------

Dictionary attack? Seriously? :D

Yes, because you need it. At least, you have to know the meaning of the terms you're using.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.