Since were are in the topic of cameras, you’re missing its been rumored at least on three reports for the ‘Triple lens’ camera to make a debut next year. I honestly believe this could be a decent camera upgrade with stereoscopic imaging _If_ it proves to be true.
https://www.macrumors.com/2018/07/05/2019-iphone-rear-3d-sensing-rumors/amp/
View attachment 790060
I'm saying if he had an iPhone with a notch he'd realize it's a complete nonissue and you don't even notice it at all unless you specifically think to look for it. No one with a notched iPhone complains about it. Ever. It's always non owners whining about something with zero experience with the product they're whining about.I'd much rather have no camera bump on the back than a hidden front camera.
Not sure what this is supposed to mean. They stated they didn't like the notch, so it wouldn't be surprising if they didn't own an iPhone with a notch.
Are you saying if they had a phone with a notch they would like the notch?
But this is still nothing more than a progression. It will be a new ability for an existing feature.
OMG can I pay someone to make this happen?I want a vantablack iPhone
Yeah, I'd like it if it was retooled. I wanted the main camera to be wider and this year it got a little wider. In a perfect world I think 0.75X, 1.5X, and 4X would be what I would want out of a three camera system. But it will probably be 1X, 2X, 3X. But for better computational photography wouldn't you want more of a triangle arrangement of the lenses to get more 3D info along an additional axis? Or maybe that benefit is less as one of them would be 3X and therefore be too zoomed in to provide useful data for an entire wide scene. Although it's possible that you could use the 2X with the 3X for portrait mode that has even better background separation using a more natural, real bokeh. But you're going to have to be backed up a ways from you subject to use it.Since were are in the topic of cameras, you’re missing its been rumored at least on three reports for the ‘Triple lens’ camera to make a debut next year. I honestly believe this could be a decent camera upgrade with stereoscopic imaging _If_ it proves to be true.
https://www.macrumors.com/2018/07/05/2019-iphone-rear-3d-sensing-rumors/amp/
View attachment 790060
Nice so you don’t know where the lens is to look into it. ****** idea imo
Can never happen. There has to be a bezel or notch for cameras / sensors. No way around it.
I'd be willing to bet you don't even have an iPhone with a notch, huh?
I'm saying if he had an iPhone with a notch he'd realize it's a complete nonissue and you don't even notice it at all unless you specifically think to look for it. No one with a notched iPhone complains about it. Ever. It's always non owners whining about something with zero experience with the product they're whining about.
In my fantasy ideal world I would have them remove the front facing camera and Face ID and do in-display Touch ID with no notch because I hardly use my front facing camera and like being able to quickly unlock my iPhone when it's on a desk without having to scan my face. But they will never do that.
We also want to get rid of the notch. So any improvements that lead us in that direction are good. Being able to cover the camera lens and still have it take photos like nothing is in front of it, is a good thing.What we all want is the camera to be hiding behind a subset of pixels that turn off when the camera is in use. AKA an all display phone with the front facing camera hiding.
Camera lens supplier Largan doesn’t work on iMac updates.Well good, because not being able to see the camera lens on my phone is a far, far bigger problem to solve than an iMac update...
As if this is people's number one concern... Seriously Apple, I can name at least 5 major things you guys need to do with the iPhone that are more important than hiding the front facing camera.
Apple design chief Jony Ive has long dreamed of an iPhone that resembles a single sheet of glass, and hiding the front camera lens would be yet another step towards that goal, even if it sounds like an insignificant change. This is the first time we've heard this rumor, however, so treat it with some skepticism.
The cameras designed so you can look at the screen, there’s no need to look at the front facing cameraNice so you don’t know where the lens is to look into it. ****** idea imo
It's always non owners whining about something with zero experience with the product they're whining about.
I'm saying if he had an iPhone with a notch he'd realize it's a complete nonissue and you don't even notice it at all unless you specifically think to look for it.
Can never happen. There has to be a bezel or notch for cameras / sensors. No way around it.
For the notch, I disagree. If the aesthetics of the phone is a high priority for someone, it doesn't matter if the notch goes unnoticed while using it.
Just like anything when aesthetics is involved.
When comparing two cars with similar specs, and one aesthetically pleasing, and one is not, would you tell a car shopper that once they drive the ugly car, they would realize it's a complete nonissue and they wouldn't even notice it at all unless they specifically think to look for it?
This could be applied to many things in life......
Apple has pattents to get around, there are prototypes that get around it. There’s a way around it, it’s definitely possible, it’s just not possible in a consumer product YET
And it’s starting to sound like razor blades on a shaver: Don’t settle for 2 blades when real experts say you need 3 (and then 4, then 5 etc, etc).