Not sure why this is interesting to you, the two are not mutually exclusive ideas.
Lightning will never be a standard, but then neither will USB-C. The standard is wireless. If you understood what I wrote, you'll see that my theory is that by the time USB-C achieves any kind of substantial market saturation, that wireless audio as well as data and charging will have advanced to a point, that at least for mobile devices, that USB-C and Lightning will both be unnecessary. Apple's goal is likely to have port-less products within a decade.
Add to that USB-C may never take off as an audio standard of any kind except on mobile devices, and even if it does, there's likely to be yet another standard in a decade to replace it too.
So if Apple converts entirely to wireless on mobile devices in 3-5 more years, why should I replace all of my Lightning accessories and equipment now, when I'm going to need an adapter to use USB-C anyway (for years to come), only to eliminate cables completely by the time USB-C makes any real impact on the market as a whole? Apple is saving me money here.
As long as I have to use an adapter anyway, what difference does it make if its Lightning or USB-C, especially when the end of wires for mobile devices is near?
[doublepost=1470519635][/doublepost]
Ah yes, the "flat" headphone jack to allow a slimmer profile on an iPhone, but still have universal compatibility with standard ports. You realize of course that it creates the exact same problem as Lightning headphones -- you still need an adapter to use your old headphones on the new iPhones, which seems to be one of the biggest complaints anybody has with this. That's real innovation there! /s
And what else could it be besides a conspiracy if engineers could easily adapt all the the features of USB-C and Lightning to the universal standards USB-A and 3.5mm TRS so that customers wouldn't have to give them up? Oh right, they're just not smart enough? Or they're too lazy? What was your implication again?