iPhone OS 3.0 was released after changes in accounting rules (GAAP vs non-GAAP revenues). So, Apple now is free to not charge updates for iPod touch.
Sorry for my English...
Sorry for my English...
Or can somebody explain why they would want to oblige themselves to provide 4.0 for free but not 4.1? They may well provide all 4.x releases for free to 3.x customers, but why not say so in the license?
Or can somebody explain why they would want to oblige themselves to provide 4.0 for free but not 4.1? They may well provide all 4.x releases for free to 3.x customers, but why not say so in the license?
Apple doesn't say they'll give you anything after 4.0 for free. They reserve the right to charge you for 4.0.1. This makes no sense to me.
Of course they'll provide free bugfix releases. Apple is fanatical about stability, which was the stated reason for having dictatorial control over the app store. I can't imagine them not providing 4.0.1 for free. They can charge for it, but they won't. Right?
But then there will be a fee to upgrade to a later 4.x release? That's crazy. Apple is the king of simple product lines, and now they're telling me that an upgrade from 3.x to 4.0 is free while an upgrade from 3.x to 4.1 costs money? I'd rather they keep it simple and charge only for major updates.
Apple, please, either provide major releases, and all point releases thereto, for free--"up to but excluding the second major release"--or don't include the next major release at all--"up to but excluding the next major release".
Or can somebody explain why they would want to oblige themselves to provide 4.0 for free but not 4.1? They may well provide all 4.x releases for free to 3.x customers, but why not say so in the license?
Apple will provide you any iPad OS software updates that it may release from time to time, up to and including the next major iPad OS software release following the version of iPad OS software that originally shipped from Apple on your iPad, for free. For example, if your iPad originally shipped with iPad 3.x software, Apple would provide you with any iPad OS software updates it might release up to and including the iPad 4.x software release.
Between the 3.2 GM Seed for iPad and the 10.6.3 update - I think the servers are getting slaughtered.
Over 2 hours (and counting) to get the SDK - which is mandatory for all new App Store submissions.
I guess no one should be surprised, but for the price tag of the most expensive 3G version of the iPad, paying for an OS update seems silly.
One of the main reasons why i bought my dads 2G iPhone to use a iPod touchdidn't have to pay for 3.0 was a nice bonus.
I guess no one should be surprised, but for the price tag of the most expensive 3G version of the iPad, paying for an OS update seems silly.
Between the 3.2 GM Seed for iPad and the 10.6.3 update - I think the servers are getting slaughtered.
Over 2 hours (and counting) to get the SDK - which is mandatory for all new App Store submissions.
huh? I spend way, way more on my MBP and I still was charged for Snow Leopard.
Incremental updates should be free - major updates should and generally do cost money.
No joke. Apple, say hello to Akamai already!
I think the distinction there is that most people aren't used to getting OS updates on such devices.And this is the line Apple will have to balance. People are used to and expect to pay for OS updates on their computers. People are not used to paying for OS updates on something that is closer to an appliance.
Apple doesn't say they'll give you anything after 4.0 for free. They reserve the right to charge you for 4.0.1. This makes no sense to me.