Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
How long can it it take to charge the tiny capacity battery - 1 hour? two?

Take your watch off to charge while you eat supper and have a shower, and then just carry on with all your sleep tracking needs.

Right, and I have thought about that scenario. But then you wake up in the morning and have to charge it again or it will die halfway through your workday! I don't plan on buying multiple charging cables in for this thing.
 
I can't wait until the glucose meter, that will be incredibly helpful for users with blood-sugar issues.

I wonder if it can be adapted to other chemicals present in the blood, should be exciting!

For Blood sugar this would really have to be leaps and bounds above technology thats out there. They have tried glucose watches in the past and they just dont work. They are not accurate having tons and tons of issues. I have been diabetic over 30 years and exreemly into the gadgets for diabetes. However, many of these "cool" ideas come and go
 
Omg, but the first galaxy gear watch was such a complete product

True -

However people have (justifiably or not) higher expectations of Apple - do they not?

Further - the original galaxy gear came out well over a year ago (is it 2 years now? I forget) and Apple's watch isn't out until 2015. Is it wrong to expect Apple's watch to exceed expectations and realities of a 2 year old smart watch?
 
How long can it it take to charge the tiny capacity battery - 1 hour? two?

Take your watch off to charge while you eat supper and have a shower, and then just carry on with all your sleep tracking needs.

Is charging that fast with inductive charging? My toothbursh takes overnight to charge and has a tiny battery.
 
I doubt Apple will make a round watch. The shape is too inefficient. Function trumps stylistic preferences. Apple's design is all about function and beauty working perfectly together. They would never abandon function.
 
I think you bring up an excellent point here that many are not considering.

Putting on my speculation hat here, I noticed in the release video that Jony mentions that they've "created a range of products" that you wear. He is, of course, referring to the various collections and combinations of bands, faces, and materials. But that got me thinking that maybe all of these other sensors come as additional, less expensive, companion devices that connect to the watch. There are a lot of benefits to that approach.

Rather than making folks feel like they're getting squeezed for a new $500 watch every year, you sell them the watch first, wait 9 months, and then release another wearable that has some sensor on it that interfaces with the watch and the Health app on your phone. Rinse/Repeat every so often to maximize ubiquity of products and profit.

BINGO!

Down the road we may see an elegant round-faced watch that doesn't have all the capabilities of the rectangular computer oriented screen, but looks nicer at the same price, or possibly cheaper. Then we have the ultra waterproof fitness band without a speaker and mic, with a seven day battery.

Put it this way: I will be more tempted to purchase multiple bands that fits all style scenarios if they all seamlessly link into different watch bodies.
 
Wouldn't be surprised if Apple gets a little more into the first version than what was shown this week. I can just see an event early next year where Tim claims "we've already improved the Apple Watch!" which will reignite the hype before it goes on sale. I think that's why they were quite vague about what is in each watch at the intro.

Then, of course, Apple Warch 2 will be even more incredible in a year....or just before next Christmas.

At the keynote Cook said something like "a whole lot more we didn't have time to show you". I'll bet they have another launch event showing off stuff they're either still working on or purposely wanted to keep secret until next year.
 
The current :apple:Watch hasn't even been released yet and we already have rumors for the next version, really, can we at least wait for this one to come out before we start to talk of the next one.

Because the 1st Generation Apple watch is half baked. Just like when the first iPad came out , Apple was holding all the good features for the iPad 2. So the people who bought the iPad 1 were left in the dark because their product was obsolete within a year.. I wont be getting the apple watch this go around for that reason, don't want to buy a device that the successor will be 10 times better within months, i could wait a year... My iPad 2 is still doing strong, my iPad 1 is already dead..
 
For Blood sugar this would really have to be leaps and bounds above technology thats out there. They have tried glucose watches in the past and they just dont work. They are not accurate having tons and tons of issues. I have been diabetic over 30 years and exreemly into the gadgets for diabetes. However, many of these "cool" ideas come and go

And how many of these things would require FDA approval? That's not a simple or fast process.
 
Imagine all the gold plated revision 1 Apple watches in 3 years obsolete.

I'm not sure we know for 100% sure, but there's nothing official on Apple's website that indicates that the watch is gold plated. They actually imply (but don't state outright) that the Apple Watch Edition is solid gold.
 
The first one isn't out yet and alread there are rumors about the next.

I have a feeling Apple is waiting for the tech to mature. They might include some improvements over the first gen watch before next year release, who knows, it's quiet a long time of wait.
 
Swimming

I wished the watch was waterproof and could count laps and strokes in the pool. I guess I'm going to have to buy the ugly Poolmate watch instead.
 
People complaining about the prices are absolutely hilarious. A normal every day regular old stylish watch from Fossil is going to cost you around $100 depending on the exact model, and this watch has every bit and more in terms of material quality, fit and finish, before you even factor in the electronics/smart watch aspect of it. More trendy watches such as Diesel are going to be at least $200 (and again, just a watch), never mind the Swiss brands. Apple is a trendy company who sells products at the upper tier of pricing. Good watches aren't cheap, and watches also aren't smartphones. This has no phone company tied to it to subsidize the cost for a contract. Use your brains a little bit and quit effing complaining, or better yet.....DONT BUY IT.
 
People complaining about the prices are absolutely hilarious. A normal every day regular old stylish watch from Fossil is going to cost you around $100 depending on the exact model, and this watch has every bit and more in terms of material quality, fit and finish, before you even factor in the electronics/smart watch aspect of it. More trendy watches such as Diesel are going to be at least $200 (and again, just a watch), never mind the Swiss brands. Apple is a trendy company who sells products at the upper tier of pricing. Good watches aren't cheap, and watches also aren't smartphones. This has no phone company tied to it to subsidize the cost for a contract. Use your brains a little bit and quit effing complaining, or better yet.....DONT BUY IT.

Why are these people hilarious. Are you suggesting that your opinion on price and feature set is more valid than someone that thinks otherwise?
 
How do we know there aren't other health sensors already packed in there. We only know what Apple told us and they also said that the watch can do a whole lot more.

I am banking on the fact that there will either be another watch or wearable released at the same time the "watch" is released. Or this device is packed with a whole lot more that they haven't said.

Remember, no one has really seen this fully. Only demos apple chose to show. They are cagey about additional specs and usage as well. I think this does more then they are letting on or there will be another keynote with more devices or wearables. I think they HAD to show something now, since Tim promised big things in 2014. Thus, pressure from Wall Street to show something. They showed enough that hardware wise, it couldn't be copied in 4months. Possibly enough to keep the competition thinking this is the direction the Apple wearable is going. I find it hard to believe that Apple hired all of these key experts in medical device technology, etc and only a heartbeat monitor is avail in the wearable.

No one is going to plunk $300 min down to then throw that away to add a new one with health sensors the next year or six months etc. Unless there is a health sensor device that is separate. Worn in a different place and uses the phone as a hub and watch for viewing data. Then this makes sense. I.e. Complete ecosystem. But, I would think that this has to be shown at the time the Apple Watchbis released or would hurt adoption if the watch with people thinking exactly what had been stated in this thread that there will be more in generation 2.


I think apple's missed the boat in not also doing a health band a la renders we've seen. Lots of people already have a watch, or just want a health band. Apple could've kicked the competition to the weeds with one, plus they could make one with a great battery life. Look at the new garmin vivosmart. It does phone notifications with a small read out of your emails, messages and calendar events, does all the apple watch does and more in health tracking (and more), and lasts a week between charges.
 
I have a feeling Apple is waiting for the tech to mature. They might include some improvements over the first gen watch before next year release, who knows, it's quiet a long time of wait.

I'm with you on that. I would be ecstatic if the device became thinner, battery lasted longer, or there were more sensors hidden underneath the watch. Underpromise and overdeliver!
 
The thing that makes the :apple: Watch great IMO is NOT the spec sheet. It's the usability of it. I think people get too carried away with sensor counts and other measurables. The real value is created by how enjoyable it is to use on a daily basis. iPod, iPhone and iPad are no different. It's very difficult to appreciate their value until you use them on a daily basis.
 
Apple Watch will be a huge success for the following reasons:

1) It is industrial design perfection, one professional watch expert was so impressed with the inovations and quality of Apple's straps he went as far as to say 'they make the Swiss look like amatures'!
2) It is fashion focussed and a means of rich personal expression
3) They nailed the user interaction, with genius innovation
4) Apple Pay will be a deeply satisfying comsumer experience and it will work best with the watch, every observer without one will look on with envy
5) It will make communication more intimate, creative and instant
6) It's far more practical for monitoring exercise than taking along a phone, especially since the phones are now huge.
 
I don't think "obsolete" means what you think it means.

In general agreed.

In relation to tech.... Getting damn close ;) iPhone 1 to iPhone 3G is a classic example, by 3GS it was a killer phone.

I suspect version 2 is what they wanted to produce. We will see.
 
The watch is already a tough sale so why make it even tougher?
Am I the only one that was 100% on board during the first 2 minutes but then as they started explaining the watch I lost complete interest at the end? I'm fine with the looks but it does way too much with one too many buttons and a knob that replaces a finger or is that a finger that replaces a knob. And that home screen looks like a cluttered mess. And I never want to view super small pictures on a watch or navigate when you're already tethered to the phone. Very redundant.

Yea, I wasn't at all interested in the lead up and after seeing the presentation. But, I'm not really a watch person anyway. I have a couple but they stay in my draw more than on my wrist.

A few people I know are really excited by the though. From 20s to 60s, so a bit of a spread of demographic.
 
Apple Watch will be a huge success for the following reasons:

1) It is industrial design perfection, one professional watch expert was so impressed with the inovations and quality of Apple's straps he went as far as to say 'they make the Swiss look like amatures'!
2) It is fashion focussed and a means of rich personal expression
3) They nailed the user interaction, with genius innovation
4) Apple Pay will be a deeply satisfying comsumer experience and it will work best with the watch, every observer without one will look on with envy
5) It will make communication more intimate, creative and instant
6) It's far more practical for monitoring exercise than taking along a phone, especially since the phones are now huge.

Have the link to that article?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.