Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
63,543
30,851



Reviews of Samsung's new Galaxy S8 and Galaxy S8+ hit the web today, and given each smartphone's potential similarities to Apple's rumored iPhone with an OLED display, we have rounded up some of the impressions below.

galaxy-s8-front.jpg
Galaxy S8's Infinity Display (Image: The Verge)

The vast majority of reviews praised Samsung's so-called Infinity Display, which takes up over 80 percent of the front of the smartphones. The design results in smartphones with large 5.8-inch or 6.2-inch screens that are still easy to hold in one hand or put in your pocket, according to reviews.

Dan Seifert, reporting for The Verge:
... I'm a fan of the new shape and the fact that it lets me have a much larger display without making the Galaxy S8 too unwieldy to use. On top of that, the Quad HD Super AMOLED panel is wonderfully vibrant and sharp, and it's very bright, even outdoors under direct sunlight. It's no exaggeration to say this is the best smartphone display I've ever seen.
Brian Heater, reporting for TechCrunch:
I've been carrying the Galaxy S8+ around for a few days now, and it fits in my pocket every bit as comfortably as the 5.5-inch iPhone 7 Plus. And you're able to operate that phone with a single hand, so this device will be no problem.
Steve Kovach, reporting for Business Insider:
It's an impressive feat of engineering. At 5.8 inches, the Galaxy S8's screen is larger than the iPhone 7 Plus screen, but packed on a slimmer and more attractive body. The iPhone looks chunky and outdated by comparison. We're getting closer and closer to the dream of having a phone that's all display on the front.
Lance Ulanoff, reporting for Mashable:
A 6.2-inch smartphone sounds comically large. However, the Galaxy S8+ is unusually narrow, with a screen aspect ratio of 18.5:9. Plus, the edges are tapered -- front and back -- much in the same way the Galaxy S7's back edge was. The result is a phone that looks a bit long but is comfortable to hold and, at least to my hands, doesn't feel large at all.
Walt Mossberg, reporting for Recode:
Samsung has drastically altered the rule that big screens mean huge phones. Even this smaller of the new Galaxy S models has a larger screen than the biggest iPhone, but it's much narrower and easier to hold and to slip into a pocket.
In order to achieve the larger display without significantly increasing the physical size of the smartphone, Samsung removed the home button from the front of the Galaxy S8. Samsung then relocated the fingerprint scanner to the back of the phone, positioning it next to the camera.

galaxy-s8-rear.jpg
Galaxy S8's rear fingerprint sensor (Image: The Verge)

Unfortunately, many reviews found the fingerprint scanner to be hard to reach and awkwardly positioned next to the camera.

Nicole Nguyen, reporting for BuzzFeed News:
The fingerprint unlock feature has traditionally been programmed into the device's home button. Seeing as the S8 ditched the button, it's now on the back of the phone. The S8's fingerprint sensor and the camera feel basically the same, which means I kept smudging the camera lens and unlocking the phone at the same time.
Dan Seifert, reporting for The Verge:
The high placement of the scanner makes it difficult and awkward to reach with my index finger, even on the smaller Galaxy S8. I have to practically perform finger stretches before I can reach it with any sort of regularity on the Galaxy S8+. Second, because it is right next to the camera and has a similar shape and feel to the camera module, I frequently touch the camera lens instead of the fingerprint scanner, smearing the lens with all of my lovely finger oils.
Apple is rumored to be working on a completely overhauled iPhone, and a display taking up nearly the entire front of the smartphone is a widely expected feature. Apple is also expected to remove the Home button, so it may too relocate Touch ID to the rear if it can't integrate it under the display.

Article Link: Galaxy S8 Reviews: Full-Front Display Scores Top Marks, But Rear Fingerprint Scanner is Awkwardly Positioned
 

anthonymoody

macrumors 68040
Aug 8, 2002
3,061
1,153
The 8+ is exactly why Apple's iCloud ecosystem is so important for lock in. I had the "misfortune" to see and hold one of these things and it makes my 7+ feel like an antique, not dissimilar from the way my first iPhone made my old Blackberry feel.

I know you can port everything over, and operate within an iOS environment (my family all have iPhones, we share calendars, iTunes sharing/accounts, etc.) but doing so is a PITA despite what many of the "easy" switching guides indicate.

Said another way - if I could use iCloud on this I'd buy an 8+ so fast it'd make your head spin.

Apple better deliver with the iPhone X or whatever it'll be called. They have real competition on the hardware side now.
 

imicca

macrumors regular
Nov 15, 2013
112
226
Yerevan, London
Samsung went too far with the size of the phone.
I have been using it for more than a day now (I am not even a press guy) and it is very awkward to use especially one-handedly. S8+ is just pure insanity. No phone needs to be that large, it is taller than Note 7 and other phablets and is very easy to drop.
And the glare and blur on edges is not good at all. YES, display is amazing, great detail, contrast, but I don't want edge display! I want flat....and they done goofed here.
Not everyone wants curved phones, Samsung.
 

macduke

macrumors G5
Jun 27, 2007
13,141
19,677
Apple will eat Samsung's lunch if they can get a huge display on the front with Touch ID integrated into the display. If they put the button on the back, then they're no better than Samsung. Why bother? It goes against every design principle Apple has ever had about the iPhone to put the button on the back. I don't think it will happen. Either we'll get a redesigned iPhone this year or we won't, but it won't have that stupid button on the back.
 

macduke

macrumors G5
Jun 27, 2007
13,141
19,677
I'm also interested to see whether or not the S8 has beaten the iPhone 7 specs yet. Weren't they still having trouble beating the 6s in most benchmarks? It will be really interesting to see what Apple's custom GPU can do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: haruhiko

imola.zhp

macrumors 65816
Jun 1, 2010
1,306
980
Mud Island (Memphis), TN
I don't want a bigger phone, my 7+ is large enough. I am actually hoping the iPhone shrinks with the removal of the top and bottom bars. I might go back to the non-plus if they actually stay the same size. A non-plus would have about the same screen size as a plus with the bars removed. Had to have the plus for portrait mode which I think I have used a total of 4 times, lmfao.
 

FloatingBones

macrumors 65816
Jul 19, 2006
1,486
745
Locating the Touch Id near the bottom of the device would avoid layout confusion with the camera lens. That seems an obvious shortcoming for the Samsung product.

One problem: I don't see how Apple could give case manufacturers advance notice of the location of a rear Touch Id without alerting MR and the other rumor sites...
 
  • Like
Reactions: haruhiko

RamGuy

macrumors 65816
Jun 7, 2011
1,351
1,913
Norway
I'm surprised why no one is talking about Instagram and Snapchat when they talk about the camera. I'm currently using a Galaxy S7 Edge while my iPhone 7 Plus is in for service. And there is no doubt the camera is great when using the stock camera-app. But the quality goes down the toilet when using Snapchat. It's not even close to matching my iPhone 7 Plus. As Snapchat is among the top five most used apps in the world, and studies show that people tend to use Snapchat for photos more often compared to the stock camera-app why doesn't reviews test the cameras using the apps most people tend to use when taking photos?
 
  • Like
Reactions: gijoeinla

Zaft

macrumors 601
Jun 16, 2009
4,553
4,032
Brooklyn, NY
I'm surprised why no one is talking about Instagram and Snapchat when they talk about the camera. I'm currently using a Galaxy S7 Edge while my iPhone 7 Plus is in for service. And there is no doubt the camera is great when using the stock camera-app. But the quality goes down the toilet when using Snapchat. It's not even close to matching my iPhone 7 Plus. As Snapchat is among the top five most used apps in the world, and studies show that people tend to use Snapchat for photos more often compared to the stock camera-app why doesn't reviews test the cameras using the apps most people tend to use when taking photos?
Why is there a difference?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.