The post in question is
this in case anyone was wondering. I think it serves as a good example of the non-issue and the thin-skin of some of the people complaining.
"Some of the people complaining" being me, I suppose. Your agreement or disagreement with my reporting that aside, how is the post in question considered relevant?
It adds
nothing to the conversation, it only belittles those who do want to discuss the topic at hand, and only further incites hostility.
We won't censor someone just because they articulate a dislike for a game you like.
I find this offensive: the presumption on your part that just because someone reports something, it (the comment) offends them or just happens to be against a position they favor.
Case in point, I own a 360, hence
I read the 360 threads. Thus, if I report a thread there is a
high correlation that said post will be in a 360 thread. That does not mean I am attempting to stamp out or censor anti-360 sentiments.
Yet that is exactly what you are purporting.
In any event, I consider it a moot point. Since the post in question (linked above) isn't a concern then clearly I am off base here.
I respectfully rescind my request and ask that this thread be closed. Clearly there is no issue here and I apologize for the spirited -- yet apparently unwarranted -- discussion that followed.
Frankly, I feel more than a little beat up over a thread that I started with the only intent to try to better the MR community. Instead I feel belittled and my position marginalized simply because my outlook "is different."
If the linked post above is considered acceptable community standards around MR then I can only accept that is by design. Surprisingly while that inflammatory post remains I had one of my own posts moderated today; a very light-hearted post with two other MR users over what constitutes "next-gen" and it was all in fun.
If the intent was to send me a very strong message it, in fact, worked.
Thank you all for your comments,