Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
If you were in the market for and AW in titanium last year then you would have paid $50 more than the Ultra and it didn’t have any of the features that are unique to the Ultra 🤷🏼‍♂️
That's because Apple was bending people over just for the case material. Now they've shoved what should have been the last 2-3 series updates into the "Ultra" and bumped the price.
 
  • Like
Reactions: arkitect
The first iPhone couldn't shoot video and it's now the best at shooting video. Garmin needs to realize that the Apple Watch Ultra is the Apple Watch Ultra Series 1............

Okay, nice fire back.

But Apple will be back next year slowly advancing to have every single feature Garmin has and then adding to the list.
Garmin needs to stop resting on its laurels and advance their product or they'll end up like Fitbit.
Garmin makes safety critical avionics equipment for general aviation. They are not going any where.
 
Garmin will not end like fitbit as garmin is a way more diverse company. Garmin still has running & cycling specific equipment that Fitibit does not, like footpods, cycling computers & power meter pedals. Plus, there is the Garmin InReach line of devices that many ultra endurance backpackers, bikepackers & expedition folks still use.

Garmin has their Nuvi automotive line which does GPS navigation and front and rear cameras for safety and security.

They sell avionics and marine products as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: subi257
Garmin’s learning that if you don’t disrupt yourself, someone is going to eventually come along and do it for you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: msackey
Garmin's low-power GPS mode is called Expedition mode and lasts up to 65 days of battery or 95 days with solar charging. The idea is that you can go on a weekend camping trip or an expedition to the south pole without charging.

I just like to not have to charge it regularly.

Garmin has a decade of my biometrics and workout activity and that data makes the Garmin very sticky.
Like I said in a previous comment, Ultra is not for serious explorers or serious divers, Solar charging is a clever feature on Garmin, however regardless of their battery prowess, they've just lost at least half their customers to Apple
 
I’ve noted this in multiple other threads, that I recently passed my Watch series 5 to my mother-in-law and bought a Garmin Epix 2, knowing full well that Apple was working on a new Watch Pro. I knew there was no way Apple would be able to get more than a couple of days of battery life out of a Watch and that was a big reason for my wanting to switch to Garmin.

I get 2 weeks (14-16 days) of battery life out of the Epix, and that’s with workouts indoors and out, and wearing it 24/7 except for the occasional band change. Beyond the extended wear time between charges, it’s got better water resistance and a great suite of health and activity tracking features, a great looking screen and sapphire lens. Plus it comes with a more masculine look in the traditional round watch form, which I also was looking to get back to.

I agree with others that Garmin’s software could use some tweaking to make it easier to use and understand, but they have nailed it with the ability to use hard button pushes to operate an otherwise screen-touch capable device. This alone is a huge plus, that can be changed per activity, so that things you do in or around the water or with heavy perspiration can be button-only input, while others not effected by moisture can be touch or button activated.

I am intrigued by the new Watch Ultra, but I’m not going to order one. I’ll give my Garmin a couple of years of hard testing and perhaps a second generation of the Watch Ultra will push entice me enough to switch back.
 
Like I said in a previous comment, Ultra is not for serious explorers or serious divers, Solar charging is a clever feature on Garmin, however regardless of their battery prowess, they've just lost at least half their customers to Apple

Garmin has expanded their customer base to budget models under $100 in the Forerunner line to the five-pack of Marq watches at $10K.

One of the big discussion topics in r/running and r/TrailRunning is the new AWU. Basically newbies asking about it. The AWU isn't taken seriously.
 
The majority of the people saying Garmin is toast are the ones that that wouldn’t truly consider a Garmin to start with. Go to any running club and look at everyone’s wrists, Garmin dominates.

If you think 60 hours is great, you don’t understand the impact of what low power mode means. It’s reduced GPS tracking and features and probably still based on 1-2 hours of activity. Low end Garmins get 20-30 hours of 1-second GPS tracking. Apple is saying 36 hours for *1 hour of activity* right now. That’s massively different. Low power mode for Garmins mean 95 days or something on the Enduro *while tracking*. I can run 8-10 hours a week with GPS and live tracking (cellular) and still only charge my watch 1-2 times a week.

It’s different markets people.
 
One thing also to remember a longer battery life standard means you can use your device longer when battery degradation starts to happen. Even getting 14 hours less gps battery out of 34 hours is 20 hours, which is still pretty good. Just means less waste.
The majority of the people saying Garmin is toast are the ones that that wouldn’t truly consider a Garmin to start with. Go to any running club and look at everyone’s wrists, Garmin dominates.
Same with cycling events. Half the people there either have a Garmin watch or cycling computer, with some even having their power meter pedals or their Varia radar lights.
 
Not going to lie, I lusted after the Garmin Fenix 7x sapphire solar, but as much of an improvement as it would be from a purely battery life standpoint, I didn't want to give up on the Apple ecosystem integration the Apple Watch has, and the Garmin will never have (yes, I know that this is a limitation imposed by Apple itself, but still). I pre-ordered the Ultra, really hoping that it lives up to the hype in terms of battery life. I still have eyes on a Garmin Enduro 2 just in case.
I went with the Epix 2, mainly because I wasn’t willing to deal with a low-res transflective LCD screen that the Fenix line uses. I was worried about not having full Apple connectivity, but I’m ok with seeing texts, emails, calls and other notifications pop up on my Epix and not be able to reply to them (when my iPhone is near). And when I’m running outside, I don’t want the distraction anyway. If you think about it, you’ll spend 20+ hours a day NOT working out, and in situations where your phone will more likely be accessible to get and reply to calls, etc. And with Garmin watches, you can not have to even think about charging the watch for 2-6 weeks at a time, which is REALLY nice, imho.
 
Even when my 4 was new it wouldn't make it on an overseas flight without dying. I'll settle for daily charging.

I do wonder though, why apple bothers to put sleep tracking in it, when you can't wear it while sleeping because you have to charge it for a few hours. Do they think people are going to charge in the middle of the day?
I actually do sleep in my Series 7...it burns around 15% overnight.
 
“We’ve learned and struggled for a few years here figuring out how to make a decent smartwatch,” he said. “PC guys are not going to just figure this out. They’re not going to just walk in.”
BWAAHAHSHAHAAHAHAHHAAHA. Never gets old. Thx.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.