Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Filling the market with superfluity and then turning around to claim huge share is nothing special.

Strawman's argument that doesn't make sense. Then again, you never have. Your s**t-eating grin on all things Apple no matter how foolish you look doesn't deter you. I gotta admit you're loyal to the Kool-Aid.

So what you say about Nokia phones, I say about all iPods. What do you have to say to that?

If Nokia phones are bought so often, there must be something worthy to it to reflect sales. Same thing w/ the iPod.

But you got your blinders on and you'll spin ANYTHING to make it seem like the sky is black if Steve Jobs tells you so. lol
 
Do you have a source?
I'm pretty sure it didn't. You realize we're talking worldwide numbers here?

If we're talking world sales, then of course Nokia and Blackberry spank iPhone sales. The iPhone's only strong market is the US where it's designed in and relentlessly marketed to.
 
If I had 1 popular car, loads of that car would sell.
If I had 15 popular cars, and all 15 models sell well, that doesn't make the individual cars any worse than the single one on offer above.

I'm loving the "If we exclude this segment of the market/exclude this company because they produce more than one handset/exclude this feature on phones APPLE IS TEH NUMBER ONES!!!!!111.

Are you a politician? You seem quite masterful at spin. :cool:

That is not how he put it.

He put it like one company has one very successfully car, and another company has 15 average to below average selling cars. When you combine all their average and below average sales together, you surpass the one massively successful car of the other company.

It is not like Nokia has 10 phones that are sold almost as much as iPhone.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.1-update1; en-gb; Nexus One Build/ERE27) AppleWebKit/530.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/530.17)

marksman said:
If I had 1 popular car, loads of that car would sell.
If I had 15 popular cars, and all 15 models sell well, that doesn't make the individual cars any worse than the single one on offer above.

I'm loving the "If we exclude this segment of the market/exclude this company because they produce more than one handset/exclude this feature on phones APPLE IS TEH NUMBER ONES!!!!!111.

Are you a politician? You seem quite masterful at spin. :cool:

That is not how he put it.

He put it like one company has one very successfully car, and another company has 15 average to below average selling cars. When you combine all their average and below average sales together, you surpass the one massively successful car of the other company.

It is not like Nokia has 10 phones that are sold almost as much as iPhone.

I was defining "popular" as popular to that company. Does everyone now have to sell an individual phone at the same quantity as the iphone to be popular for that brand now?

Nokia make a fair bit of cash on their handsets despite having a single phone which sells at the same level as the only phone on offer from apple.

Honestly, I'll agree with Ltd that apple have the best selling single handset if it makes you happy but when it is your ONLY handset on offer, what other way can it go?
 
It won't. Because the consumer won't really care.

Just like they didn't care with Apple's previous "negative" moves with the App Store, i.e., Google Voice, etc. The whole is greater than the parts.

It'll go unnoticed. The beauty and the usability of the device itself will, as usual, trump the removal of a few apps, especially if they're the questionable-content kind.

I'm not so sure the consumer doesn't care. As for "it'll go unnoticed", I'm already reading about it in the mainstream media, and boy, you should read the reader comments on those articles. :eek:
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.1-update1; en-gb; Nexus One Build/ERE27) AppleWebKit/530.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/530.17)

Erwin-Br said:
*LTD* said:
It won't. Because the consumer won't really care.



Just like they didn't care with Apple's previous "negative" moves with the App Store, i.e., Google Voice, etc. The whole is greater than the parts.



It'll go unnoticed. The beauty and the usability of the device itself will, as usual, trump the removal of a few apps, especially if they're the questionable-content kind.



I'm not so sure the consumer doesn't care. As for "it'll go unnoticed", I'm already reading about it in the mainstream media, and boy, you should read the reader comments on those articles. :eek:

I was quite shocked to see the news on the BBC.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8530124.stm



The even spoke to the Aussie developers of Wobble on BBC radio! (Apologies people, BBC uses Flash for video/audio) :D
 
So Apple is 14% of a market that is 14% of the total market, which constitutes a small portion of the total internet users.

THIS is how Apple will leverage themselves to kill Flash?
 
So Apple is 14% of a market that is 14% of the total market, which constitutes a small portion of the total internet users.

THIS is how Apple will leverage themselves to kill Flash?

Apple's greedy, unethical and delusional. That's enough to let them truck on.

Flash has 75% of the Internet yet Apple thinks they can kill it just because it's a proprietary they don't own. But they think "we think we can, we think we can, we think we can" and it's all fine and dandy.

Meanwhile, the Apple Apps Store is a mammoth gluttonous monster and when the Android Apps Store say "we think we can", they get laughed at.

Quite the double standard by the fanboys. :rolleyes:
 
So Apple is 14% of a market that is 14% of the total market, which constitutes a small portion of the total internet users.

THIS is how Apple will leverage themselves to kill Flash?

I don't think anyone really believes they will. Just wishful thinking. Reality is that 90% of the market is using PC's and don't understand what the fuss is about because their browser handle Flash just fine.

If Flash disappears, it's because Adobe doesn't catch up. Real Player didn't disappear because Apple or Microsoft banned it from their devices. It disappeared because better alternatives entered our lives and Real Player didn't catch up. Html5 might be that alternative or it might not. Too early to tell. But I just wish Apple would stay out of this and let things run their course. Like Real Player.
 
So Apple is 14% of a market that is 14% of the total market, which constitutes a small portion of the total internet users.

THIS is how Apple will leverage themselves to kill Flash?

Apple has never claimed that they are going to kill Flash.

You can minimize the impact of iPhone OS devices all you want, but it's a big enough group to cause a whole lot companies to develop iPhone specific apps and websites.
 

Attachments

  • apple_truths.JPG
    apple_truths.JPG
    68 KB · Views: 78
I'm definitely sick of paying the high rates that go along with having a smart phone. When my contract runs out, I'll be going back to my old "dumb phone" :cool:
 
Actually, Apple claimed SECOND place.

With some notable exceptions, most of Nokia's garbageware doesn't count.

Filling the market with superfluity and then turning around to claim huge share is nothing special.

The article goes demonstrates that Apple was the No. 3 smartphone vendor in 2009.

The iPhone has been the #1 smartphone in the world for a while now: the iPhone sells more units than any other single model of smartphone in the world.

Apple only sells the one model (more, if you count differing amounts of RAM as different models). Nokia sells around a dozen different smartphones, none of which support sales approaching that of the iPhone. Grouped together, their numbers exceed that of the iPhone. The same goes for RIM. Even if you group all the touchscreen smartphones by vendor, Apple is No. 1 in the world.

It's just fact. There is no single smartphone model that is more popular than the iPhone. That's saying quite a bit.

Which leads one to believe that these other players are simply unable to produce something on the level of the iPhone. Now THAT is really saying something.

Buy one get one free promotion. ;)

I don't think you understood.

SpinCity.jpg
 
I'm definitely sick of paying the high rates that go along with having a smart phone. When my contract runs out, I'll be going back to my old "dumb phone" :cool:

Even though you can now buy less expensive iPhone plan than ever before? I also don't like paying as much as I do, but I really would not want to lose the convenience.
 
Need. External Keyboard. -- WHEN?!!!

WHEN is Apple going to enable iPhone, iPod Touch, and iPad users to use an external docking or BT keyboard?

With global entry/editing?

Don't they realize the audience they are missing?!
 
iPhone ATT customers CAN cancel data plan.

Even though you can now buy less expensive iPhone plan than ever before? I also don't like paying as much as I do, but I really would not want to lose the convenience.


Little-known factoid -- ATT users CAN CANCEL their data plan when they own an iPhone.

ATT requires iPhone purchasers to SIGN UP for the data plan, but you can cancel the next day.

So -- if you can live with WiFi -- or you want a smart-phone without wireless connectivity, you don't need to buy a data plan. :)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.