A bad batch is at least possible, but I really doubt the material on every new iPod is different when Apple says it's the same.emotion said:I see what you're getting at and I kind of agree. Interestingly I was about to buy a nano from the Uni shop at UCSD when I was over there on business (I'm from the UK). The two display models both were covered in scratches. Maybe a bad example but it was enough to make me think twice.
I dunno, I want Apple to have got this right but I'm beginning to thinkthey haven't.
tny said:My guess is that the clear facing material (which used to be limited to the LCD, but now covers the front of the iPod)
The warranty would always cover problems that are Apple's fault (if any such REAL issue should emerge). Now Apple is offering support BEYOND the warranty, covering abuse. That's nice of them, whether it lasts a week, a month, or a year. ANY time period is above and beyond what they have to do. Things are better for customers today than they were before this decision. So what's the problem?iDM said:What happens down the line when i try to use this thing and the hardware fails but I'm out of Apple's Generous replacement period this is BS if its true.
Something makes me think this rumor will spiral into strange and surreal new places for a long time 😛Tommyg117 said:What DOES happen when this runs out or if it comes out that apple is at fault with a scratchable screen? I havn't seen any yet, but if they are bad then that sucks because then i'll be stuck with a faulty piece of hardware with no generous replacement.
If you're thinking that because two people have posted, remember this: who would BOTHER to post and say "I have no dead pixels"? Very few would. But if you DO have them, it's human nature to complain. Thus, ANY online forum will make the product in question seem more trouble-prone than it really is. 1% of people with a problem will post ten times as much as 99% of people who have nothing to complain about. Nothing wrong with that--it's human nature, and sharing problems/solutions is actually very useful. (And bad pixels on LCDs are an occasional fact of life--otherwise they'd be insanely expensive. 5g iPods of course have many MORE pixels than any previous iPod.)Lertie32 said:Is there a trend of problems with the video ipods - dead pixels on a large number of them?
bigandy said:and in one swift movement, pissing every left hander on the planet off....
anyway, it's not so good with the two handed operation. that's where the ipod's always shined, easy, onehanded operation.
Yeah and lucky me I have a few dead pixels, I'd go to the Apple store but, then I'll have a chance to get more dead pixels, and maybe even in a worse place. Oh well, early adopter problems *sigh* 😛 🙄nagromme said:Bad pixels on LCDs are an occasional fact of life--otherwise they'd be insanely expensive. 5g iPods of course have many MORE pixels than any previous iPod.)
nagromme said:I have also seen half a dozen display-model nanos and 5gs, manhandled all day every day, and still looking good.)
devilot76 said:Originally Posted by nagromme
I just looked at ALL the nanos (And 5G iPods) at my local Apple Store and one other store. The floor models that get manhandled and dropped face down on the counter all day every day.
Sigh. I reply to that the same way I did earlier in this thread and the same way other posters have as well-- if you have never worked sales retail this is what happens w/ floor displays:
Items get broken/scratched up/ whatever-- they get marked as 'defected,' the manager signs it off, and it disappears and a new one in its spot instead.
You can not necessarily get an honest gauge for a product based solely on the floor models.
nagromme said:Actually, Apple has a HISTORY of going above and beyond the warranty--both in specific individual cases, and as a matter of larger policy when it's the right thing to do.
You call the new iPods "faulty" but there's no evidence for that being the trend at all.
Apple has ALWAYS replaced faulty iPods. THIS policy is to replace iPods that YOU broke. And that does indeed fit the term "generous."
Apple's hardware reliability is the highest in the computer industry, and their service and support are the best too. By not one but several large-scale surveys.
So if you think Apple tends to make faulty products and then treat people unfairly, I HIGHLY recommend you don't risk buying from another company 🙂
Of course ANY company is staffed by people who can make mistakes. Any hardware maker will have customers who were turned away unfairly for a warranty issue. But that is NOT the pattern with Apple. It's the exception by far.
I'd go anyway, because anything with an LCD has some kind of policy for replacement due to bad pixels. If you have more than one, you may be due an automatic replacement and never know it! Doesn't hurt to ask. (And if your screen does qualify for replacement, you can always open that in the store just be extra sure it's not worse.)LimeiBook86 said:Yeah and lucky me I have a few dead pixels, I'd go to the Apple store but, then I'll have a chance to get more dead pixels, and maybe even in a worse place.
No it doesn't, I agree. But it DOES suggest that the worst case is unlikely: that you can't just give an iPod a terrible, blatant scratch with a single soft touch of a finger, like some have suggested. If that were the case, they'd have to be replacing the display models on the hour.autrefois said:So whether or not the display models look fine doesn't prove one way or the other whether there is a scratching issue.
nagromme said:I'd go anyway, because anything with an LCD has some kind of policy for replacement due to bad pixels. If you have more than one, you may be due an automatic replacement and never know it! Doesn't hurt to ask. (And if your screen does qualify for replacement, you can always open that in the store just be extra sure it's not worse.)
otoloui said:I had the same issue with my screen and I took it back to the store. They told me that it wasn't actually a dead pixel but a defect in the plastic covering the screen. I'm wondering if this is what all the huss is about.
DaftUnion said:People are starting to get ridiculous (as if they weren't before🙂 ) but seriously, people seem to be more concerned about keeping their iPod's perfect...and care less about their car getting slight scratches which cost magnitudes more than an iPod. Just to put things in perspective. Use a case, simple. Or if your paranoid about it getting scratched IN a case...then don't use it😛 I promise it'll stay perfect then.
notjustjay said:See, here's a good example of the "in the eye of the beholder" point that was just mentioned. I saw a nano up close for probably the second time ever, at a store display yesterday. It looked beautiful in my eyes. Worried about the scratching everyone keeps talking about, I looked very closely. When I brought it right up to my eye, and in the correct angle, I saw tiny scratches.
And I said "THIS is what everyone is complaining about???"
My 3G iPod scratched about that badly, especially on the metal back. I didn't care then, I won't care now. It's no worse than any other product I'd buy. My cell phone is in worse shape. The bottom of my Apple Pro Keyboard is scratched up far worse than that.
Unless there's something I'm missing, this to me is a non-issue.
You made me think of a good test: I dragged my iPod nano hard across the side of my car, from front to back. Guess what? They BOTH scratched! 🙁 😱DaftUnion said:people seem to be more concerned about keeping their iPod's perfect...and care less about their car getting slight scratches
You can probably test that in the same way you can test a laptop LCD for bad-pixel vs. surface-defect: tilt the iPod back and forth and see if the defect shifts at all. Easiest to tell if there's some pattern or image on the screen, maybe a dark grid or something.LimeiBook86 said:He may be right, I'll go to the Apple store soon and find out what's going on.
Tupring said:Boo hoo! I brought my Discman to school everyday. The hall is not class and it should be ok. Lunchrooms and maybe the Library too. Class however is understandable that it doesn't need to be used.
adzoox said:They already did ... that's what "the press" and Apple haters aren't reporting. Or, if they are, they report it like this:
"It was just to cover a screen cracking issue"
No, Apple is replacing just about any Nano owner's NANO that has reasonable complaint about any issue. But the catch is, there wasn't really an issue, and those that don't buy a case for a $200 investment, or can't figure out that they can simply get some scratch remover and then polish this with a wax coating - are just idiots!
Ja Di ksw said:It's sad when a kid can't go for four minutes (passing time) without needing to have something entertain them.
That being said, they ARE being used in class. I'd say about 15% of students (try to) listen to music during the class.
Just wondering who gets to justify all the MILLIONS of other devices that are able to be scratched and shipped without cases 😉jjd said:I cannot believe how the Apple sycophants will justify ANYTHING Apple does. Not even Apple is as one-eyed about this stuff! Apple is not perfect. Apple acknolwedges that. Why can't you guys?
It would help if Apple didn't seem to be using cheaper materials to drive down their costs and simultaneously make iPods more "disposable".nagromme said:Just wondering who gets to justify all the MILLIONS of other devices that are able to be scratched and shipped without cases 😉
Something has changed. Perhaps it's the same polycarbonate, but the nano is DEFINITELY more scratchable than my 4G iPod was. Cases were NOT available on Day One for the nano... it's easy to say "buy a case", but what do you do when there are NO cases available?nagromme said:The nano would be better with a case than without, but then again, Apple has shipped that same plastic without a case in the past. Some people bought cases for it, some didn't, and it wasn't a huge issue. Now, with the same plastic (unless Apple's lying or they received a bad batch) it IS an issue.
I truly think it's more easily scratched now than it used to be.nagromme said:So is something truly different this time? Or is it "the power of Internet buzz" creating a big "new" problem from a small problem that existed for years: the fact the plastic can be scratched.
Originally Posted by Stridder44
Thank you! All you @#!$% complaining about scratches and junk.....the guy who is suing Apple should be put up against a wall and shot. Its only $99!!! A car, which is many thousands of dollars, gets scratches too! So what? Lets all sue the car companies! Maybe you should buy a damn protector for your iPod.
Yoyodyne said:If one more person makes an idiotic analogy about a car and an iPod Im gonna scream. You cannot compare two objects that have completely different functions.