Oh - that's 100% the future. Its just going to suck.The future isn’t government micro-regulating the tech industry either.
Oh - that's 100% the future. Its just going to suck.The future isn’t government micro-regulating the tech industry either.
It wouldn’t be the first time something like that happened. FaceTime in the UAE is illegal, so Apple has had that feature disabled there for years.I'd laugh if apple was forced to comply and they simply decide to pull apple pay from germany saying if we can't have it our way then we simply remove the feature all together.
But apparently the UK need someone to guide them, they have been discussing for months and still don‘t know what they even want.Those pesky Germans just can’t resist meddling in absolutely everything.
Thank heavens the UK will soon no longer be under the thumb of the United States of Europe.
why would anyone even want to use anything other than Apple Pay?
Apple should pull out from Germany in retaliation.
Next:
- Pass a law to force Coca Cola to open their secret formula to other manufacturers.
- Pass a law to force Apple to allow macOS to run on PCs.
- Pass a law to force Apple to let users install Android on iPhones and iPads.
...are we going insane!?
It's a NFC chip the customer paid for, not "their [Apple's] platform"
Not sure what you are talking about. What does Bluetooth connections have to do with Apple security stance on nfc payments?What are you talking about?
So next Apple should block bluetooth connections for anything other than AirPods and Apple Watches to prevent "rivals somehow being able to profit"?
Sure it’s your phone, but the software is locked down. Hopefully one understands that at purchase time, but then again, this is MR.It's a NFC chip the customer paid for, not "their [Apple's] platform"
Hypothetical situations lead to amusing conclusions.Up next: Dropbox banned from using internet provided by Apple's WiFi/cellular chips because of security concerns and you can pay for iCloud anyway
That’s true except I like how I can use Apple Pay to purchase goods and services on-line instead of using a credit card. Much more secure and faster.There is nothing special about Apple Pay. There are plenty of payment management services. Apple just bans all their competitors to protect their own commission.
Germany has historically been more reluctant than other Western European countries to move to a cashless society, especially when it comes to credit cards.
It depends on whether the NFC chip is accessible without the Secure Enclave. If it can, then Apple has to make it available to third-parties, otherwise if it would require to "compromise" the Secure Enclave Apple might have a good argument to be exempt from this regulation.Come on. It's not about opening Apple Pay to others. It's about making the NFC chip accessible to others. So it has nothing to do with security concerns about ApplePay.
Seems good to me. The user should be able to choose which payment provider he wants to use and gets started by default.
I'll likely stay with Apple Pay though.
apple is, as usual, pretty arrogant here.
they want the best of both worlds. they want to use an open standard, but they want it only to work with their devices.
either you use an open standard and treat it as such, or you make your own proprietary one.
...the government shouldn't abuse legislation to try and make it so, but should move to introduce fitting legislation through the correct process otherwise it just looks like a vendetta.