Covering up her own mistake by giving the public the impression that this tattoo artist is unethical and not trustworthy, has potentially cost him a lot of lost revenue, possibly his job, and may lead to this guy getting (even more) crap from people who see him on the street. People were probably already a bit scared of him before, but now he's a guy with a lot of tattoos and piercings, AND he's a monster who tattoos people's faces while they sleep. Just wonderful.
very good point, it might actually warrant a countersuit.
i've read a long letter from the artist on another website in which he explains (in english ad french) in detail what happened, supported by a witness and by police reports (in flemish, and so much for the "language barrier").
the story is totally bs, but i think eventually he may benefit from the publicity, especially if it will come out, (as i am sure it will, i have seen zero comments in her support), that she just tried to scam him.
i totally believe his side of the story, but that said, i think it was a bit unethical on his side to go ahead with that tattoo on a 18 yrs old who has zero tattoos before. In the case of large and highly visible tattoos on young kids i think the artist should show some restraint, and maybe just send her out with the temporary stenciled drawings for a day, to see if they want to go ahead with it. And I would most definitively take a picture of the stencils and get the written consent to go ahead, especially with facial/hands tattoos.