My friend here is the stupid part. If your Corvette has a gas engine you get CarPlay. If it is electric then you don’t. Makes zero sense.
I agree.I don't think people will NOT buy a car because it has something other then carplay.
I read an article recently that said GM estimates it will generate about $2B from subscriptions and services revenue. Apple generates over $80B from subscriptions and services.While I'm dismayed at the direction of the automotive industry the writing is on the wall. We're going to see subscriptions, ads, and our driving habits, locations will be sold to the highest bidder. This is going to generate a lot more money for GM then if they stuck with Carplay.
Personally I hate CarPlay, mostly because of the garbage Music interface. Search sucks. It's so much easier/faster to just grab my phone and find what I want to play.I've used Ford's infotainment system before they went to car play and Jeep's. Both are horrible compared to Carplay, Apple did a great job but alas the writing is on the wall.
Nope. The most expensive brand at GM is Cadillac. They have worked very hard to get their average customer age to go down, way down. And they have an internal study that shows that Cadillac customers have iPhones. 98 percent of them do.GM is actually super smart here. They know their demographic is generally older, more affluent. These are people who generally own Android phones because they like more fine-control over their personal technology. These tech-savvy folks will enjoy tinkering with the ways their phone can interact with their Cadillac.
*am handed a note*
I refused to consider Toyota as a possible replacement vehicle when they didn't offer CarPlay. I probably would have considered a 4Runner rather than holding on to my older car. We did just get my wife a new RAV4 Hybrid, but they also now support wireless CarPlay and we use it constantly.I don't think people will NOT buy a car because it has something other then carplay.
While I'm dismayed at the direction of the automotive industry the writing is on the wall. We're going to see subscriptions, ads, and our driving habits, locations will be sold to the highest bidder. This is going to generate a lot more money for GM then if they stuck with Carplay.
I've used Ford's infotainment system before they went to car play and Jeep's. Both are horrible compared to Carplay, Apple did a great job but alas the writing is on the wall.
The more affluent purchase Apple devices, value privacy, and could less and freebie Android phones.GM is actually super smart here. They know their demographic is generally older, more affluent. These are people who generally own Android phones because they like more fine-control over their personal technology. These tech-savvy folks will enjoy tinkering with the ways their phone can interact with their Cadillac.
*am handed a note*
Apple doesn't charge manufacturers to include CarPlay.As you know, Apple partners must first sign a commercial contract - including the infamous Apple tax - and only then a technical contract. Big companies (e.g. banks) don't easily give in, usually ending up with Apple taking 30% of "something" to be debated. This can take years and may be the reason of Apple and GM disagreement. Since both companies make 40%+ sales in North America, this is surely a stateside matter.
Only because Tesla is pretty good at software, and consistent updates/improvements. GM gonna have to prove themselves here, and they have a tall hill to climb.Tesla does not offer Car Play either, and they seem to be doing just fine.
As the owner of 3 BMWs with CarPlay, I used to think this too. But then I spent a few years without it, driving my Tesla. But then, recently a week with a Toyota that had CarPlay. The 'going back' part was almost shocking.I would not buy any new vehicle (no matter the price range) without CarPlay.
Once we figure out the next major advance in battery technology .... which is taking forever....Tesla may very well become the largest car manufacturer in the world and Americas legacy brands probably die. Once we have the next battery Ford is going to only make trucks, and most will stop making unprofitable cars they only currently do for govt regulations. Right now EV big vehicles suck because once you load them up or tow battery life is a joke. So if you want and EV ... why buy some massive Escalade laden with legacy designs?Tesla had first mover advantage in the EV market. I see Tesla surviving as a niche car brand that primarily handles charging infrastructure.
GM seeing what they want to see to justify executive avarice to shake down their customers for services they get for free on their phone. I understand that a bit when someone is basically giving something away. I don't understand it when the customer just handed you 100k for your Gillette razor handle on wheels.
Unless I'm absolutely married to a car brand, I totally would not buy a car for lack of CarPlay.I don't think people will NOT buy a car because it has something other then carplay.
While I'm dismayed at the direction of the automotive industry the writing is on the wall. We're going to see subscriptions, ads, and our driving habits, locations will be sold to the highest bidder. This is going to generate a lot more money for GM then if they stuck with Carplay.
I've used Ford's infotainment system before they went to car play and Jeep's. Both are horrible compared to Carplay, Apple did a great job but alas the writing is on the wall.
After many painful years without it, Teslas now have the Apple Music app. While not quite CarPlay, it goes a long way.Only car I would buy without CarPlay is a Tesla just due to its charging network. I wouldn't be surprised if Tesla does include CarPlay in future updates.
Turn off headphone / ear protection?Carplay or Android Auto just aren't good enough for me not to buy a care because it's not available. If Apple would just fix the bluetooth volume level crud in their iPhone that would be good enough for me. (volume is always too low on bluetooth) I have to turn the car's audio up so loud that when I switch to something in the car like the radio, it's WAY too loud.
They can sell lucrative location-based ads on the built-in navigation system. They can't do that if you use CarPlay. Plus many other monetization opportunities.
I would not buy any new vehicle (no matter the price range) without CarPlay.
In the future meaning after Tesla puts them out of business? 😂
Yeah, the “next-gen” CarPlay stuff enables communication with lots of other sensors/systems in the car, but communicating EV charge level specifically has been available to manufacturers for at least a year or 2 already. It’s frustrating that only Ford takes advantage of the API. I think I heard that BMW is going to any day now, but I might be misremembering.This is false. iOS supports EV routing with charge state information. I use it every road trip I make with my Ford Mustang Mach-E since it was released in March 2022.
It does require the car to communicate the information to iOS. Last I checked only Ford vehicles including the Mach-E and F150 Lightning. While I couldn't find public documentation, it's clear it's not meant to be a Ford-only feature. Much like how Apple Car Keys is the implementation of the CCC Digital Key standard, I would be shocked if this feature was highly proprietary.
GM is actually super smart here. They know their demographic is generally older, more affluent. These are people who generally own Android phones because they like more fine-control over their personal technology. These tech-savvy folks will enjoy tinkering with the ways their phone can interact with their Cadillac.
*am handed a note*