It's a little less if you're willing to settle with 1080p.Try to shop for a 24" IPS Dell, while still cheaper than the ACD, it won't cost you 279$.
It's a little less if you're willing to settle with 1080p.Try to shop for a 24" IPS Dell, while still cheaper than the ACD, it won't cost you 279$.
Not if you want to use it just with your Macs or recent PC. (mini-DP to regular DP is trivial to do, and some ATI cards even have mini-DP)
Yea bro, this thread sucks. You should leave it then.
Yea bro, this thread sucks. You should leave it then.
The guys has a point. You clearly know next to nothing about display technology, yet you start a thread bashing one.
You originally confused TN with TFT, then with LED. TN is the type of panel, not the backlight.
I strongly recommend reading this (as a start): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TFT_LCD
Then read up on the advantages of LED backlighting.
Then, you'll have an idea of what you're talking about.
4) But for 300-400$ you get these pluses:
- LED backlight (CCFL will dim in a few years)
- f*cking better design
- good and durable materials/build (glass and aluminum)
- internal AC transfomer for charging your MacbookPro while attached
- integrated iSight webcam
- integrated speakers and mic
- annoying reflections whenever something remotely dark appears on screen
It's a little less if you're willing to settle with 1080p.
this was the post
"So Basically what advantage do you get with an Apple Display over anything else? "
man I bashed it to death there
Obviously I don't know much about display tech = reason to start a thread looking for people who do.
Be mature and admit you didn't know about TN vs IPS. The title definitely "sucks", I'd be more cautious next time. It's always funny when somebody write like "are you all people nuts? how would you EVER buy an ACD?" and then it turns out he didn't know what the hell he was talking about. (comparing oranges to apples)
please read the first post.
I wasn't bashing anything, I was saying "What advantage... etc"
and then putting out two options that I had.
At what point was I acting like one was better, or, saying ACD sucked?
No where. The thread title is to get people in here. Obviously it worked.
It's not only 1080p, it's also 23".
23" against 24" doesn't matter. 1080 instead of 1200 lines is the real problem.
I think it matters regarding the price.
Same for this Dell:
http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/...etail.aspx?c=us&l=en&s=dhs&cs=19&sku=320-9270
(I think Eidorian meant this)
It's 299$ but it has both lower area and lower resolution. (and CCFL backlighting)
So, at 16:10 maybe it could cost $400. Still a long way to go to the ACD price.
So 300-400$ cheaper than the ACD, with more video ports but without all the "pluses" (including LED, aluminum, webcam, laptop charger, etc.)
So, not *that* long way to go, even just considering plastic vs metal+glass.
You don't need to guess, as I showed in the previous page the 16:10 24" IPS model from Dell costs 599$. (special offer 499$).
I need Picture in Picture as well.That Dell is a billion color monitor with a ton of inputs. Something similar to the new U2311H, but in 16:10 would be cheaper.
If you choose the Dell over the ACD:
What you gain:
- a lot of video ports
- 300-400$
What you lose:
- LED backlight (CCFL will dim in a few years)
- f*cking better design
- good and durable materials/build (glass and aluminum)
- internal AC transfomer for charging your MacbookPro while attached
- iSight webcam
- speakers
Is that worth 300-400$? For a lot of people, yes. It's not like you buy a monitor every year.
Other than the laughs, one of the worst Macrumors threads I've read in some time.